Revision of the sokolow-lyon-rappaport and cornell voltage criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy;Revisão dos critérios de sokolow-lyon-rappaport e cornell para hipertrofia do ventrículo esquerdo

Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 44-51

  Rodrigues, Sérgio Lamêgo ^a   D'Angelo, Lílian ^a,b   Pereira, Alexandre Costa ^b   Krieger, José Eduardo ^b   Mill, José Geraldo ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF ESPÍRITO SANTO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Echocardiography; Electrocardiography; Hypertension; Hypertrophy, left ventricular

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNELL VOLTAGE CRITERION; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE HYPERTROPHY; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERFORMANCE; PREVALENCE; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOKOLOW LYON RAPPAPORT CRITERION;

EID: 41149122627     PISSN: 0066782X     EISSN: 16784170     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0066-782X2008000100008     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Porcellati C. Prognostic value of a new electrocardiographic method for diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 31: 383-90.
2. Kannel WB, Gordon T. Left ventricular hypertrophy by electrocardiogram: prevalence, incidence, and mortality in the Framingham Study. Ann Intern Med. 1969; 71: 89-105.
3. Koren MJ, Devereux RB, Casale PN. Relation of left ventricular mass and geometry to morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated essential hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 1991; 114: 345-52.
4. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Castelli WP. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1990; 322: 1561-6.
5. Devereux RB, Alderman MH. The role of preclinical cardiovascular disease in the evolution from risk factor exposure to the development of clinical morbid events. Circulation. 1993; 88: 1444-55.
6. Casale PN, Devereux RB. Eletrocardiographic detection of left ventricular hypertrophy development and prospective validation of improved criteria. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985; 6: 572-80.
7. Okin PM, Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kligfield P. Electrocardiographic identification of increased left ventricular mass by simple voltage-duration products. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25: 417-23.
8. Sokolow M, Lyon TP. The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertrophy as obtained by unipolar precordial and limb leads. Am Heart J. 1949; 37: 161-86.
9. Gasperin CA, Germiniani H, Facin CA, Souza AM, Pereira da Cunha CL. An analysis of electrocardiographic criteria for determining left ventricular hypertrophy. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2002; 78: 72-83.
10. Casale PN, Devereux RB. Improved sex-specific criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy for clinical and computer interpretation of electrocardiograms: validation with autopsy findings. Circulation. 1987; 75: 565-72.
11. Mill JG, Molina MCB, Silva IO. Epidemiologia da hipertensão arterial na cidade de Vitória, Espírito Santo. Hipertensão. 2004; 7: 109-16.
12. Pereira AC, Mill JG, Krieger JE. Angiotensinogen 235T allele dosage is associated with blood pressure phenotypes. Hypertension. 2003; 41: 25-30.
13. Lessa I, Fonseca J. Raça e aderência ao tratamento e ou consulta e controle da hipertensão arterial. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1997; 6: 443-9.
14. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Weyman A. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-Mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation. 1978; 58: 1072-83.
15. Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Reicheck N. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol. 1986; 57: 450-8.
16. Dubois D, Dubois EF. A formula to estimate the aproximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Intern Med. 1916; 17: 863-71.
17. De Simone G, Devereux RB. Gender differences in left ventricular growth. Hypertension. 1995; 26: 979-83.
18. De Simone G, Kizer JR, Devereux RB. Normalization for body size and population attributable risk of left ventricular hypertrophy: The Strong Heart Study. Am J Hypertens. 2005; 18: 191-6.
19. Dawson-Saunders B, Trapp RG. Basic & Clinical Biostatistics. 2nd ed. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange; 1994. p. 148.
20. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982; 143: 29-36.
21. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983; 148: 839-43.
22. Norman JE Jr, Levy D. Improved detection of echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy using a new electrocardiographic algorithm. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 21: 1680-6.
23. Molloy TJ, Okin PM, Devereux RB. Electrocardiographic detection of left ventricular hypertrophy by the simple QRS voltage duration product. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992; 20: 1180-6.
24. National High Blood Pressure Education Program. The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Arch Intern Med. 1997; 157: 2413-46.
25. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003; 289 (19): 2560-72.
26. Devereux RB, Reicheck N. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man: anatomic validation of the method. Circulation. 1977; 55; 613-8.
27. Anderson KM, Kannel WB. An updated coronary risk profile: a statment for health professionals. Circulation. 1991; 83: 356-62.
28. Levy D ,Castelli WP. Determinants of sensitivity and specificity of eletrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation. 1990; 81: 815-20.
29. Simon A, Giral P, Levenson J. Extracoronary atherosclerotic plaque at multiple sites and total coronary calcification deposit in asymptomatic men: association with coronary risk profile. Circulation. 1995; 92: 1414-21.
30. Reichek N, Devereux RB. Left ventricular hypertrophy: relationship of anatomic, echocardiographic and eletrocardiographic findings. Circulation. 1981; 63: 1391-8.
31. Devereux RB, Eisenberg RRl. Electrocardiographic detection of left ventricular hypertrophy using echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass as the reference standard: comparison of standard criteria, computer diagnosis and physician interpretation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984; 3: 82-7.
32. Schillaci G, Porcellati C. Improved eletrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol. 1994; 74; 714-9.
33. Alfakih K, Walters K, Sivananthan M. New gender-specific partition values for ECG criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy. recalibration against cardiac MRI. Hypertension. 2004; 44: 175-9.
34. Noble LM, Mongham GB. Left ventricular hypertrophy in left bundle block. J Eletrocardiol. 1984; 17: 157-60.
35. Okin PM, Dahlof B for the LIFE Study Investigators. Ethnic differences in electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy: The LIFE Study. Am Heart J. 2002; 15: 663-71.
36. Chapmam JN, Poulter NR. Ethnic differences in the identification of left ventricular hypertrophy in the hypertensive patient. Am J Hypertens. 1999; 12: 437-42.
37. Kohsaka S, Di Tullio M. Additional impact of electrocardiographic over echocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy for predicting the risk of ischemic stroke. Am Heart J.. 2005; 149: 181-6.
38. Ângelo LCS, Vieira MLC, Rodriges SL, Morelato RL, Pereira AC, Mill JG, et al. Echocardiographic reference values in a sample of asymptomatic adult Brazilian population. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2007; 89: 184-90.