Efficacy of Lidocaine Spray as Topical Anesthesia for Outpatient Rigid Cystoscopy in Women: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial

Urology

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 561-566

  Choe, Jin Ho ^a   Kwak, Kyung Won ^b   Hong, Jeong Hee ^c   Lee, Hyun Moo ^b  

^a Kwandong University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Dankook University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIDOCAINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BURNING SENSATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTOSCOPY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG DOSAGE FORM COMPARISON; DRUG EFFICACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MORBIDITY; NOCICEPTION; PAIN; PAIN THRESHOLD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT RESPONSE; URETHRITIS;

ADMINISTRATION, TOPICAL; ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; CYSTOSCOPY; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIDOCAINE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETHRA;

EID: 41149085943     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.057     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Dao T.T., and LeResche L. Gender differences in pain. J Orofac Pain 14 (2000) 169-184 discussion 184-195
2. Feine J.S., Bushnell M.C., Miron D., et al. Sex differences in the perception of noxious heat stimuli. Pain 44 (1991) 255-262
3. Fillingim R.B., Maixner W., Kincaid S., et al. Sex differences in temporal summation but not sensory-discriminative processing of thermal pain. Pain 75 (1998) 121-127
4. Riley III J.L., Robinson M.E., Wise E.A., et al. Sex differences in the perception of noxious experimental stimuli: a meta-analysis. Pain 74 (1998) 181-187
5. Sarlani E., and Greenspan J.D. Gender differences in temporal summation of mechanically evoked pain. Pain 97 (2002) 163-169
6. Brekkan E., Ehrnebo M., Malmstrom P.U., et al. A controlled study of low and high volume anesthetic jelly as a lubricant and pain reliever during cystoscopy. J Urol 146 (1991) 24-27
7. Goldfischer E.R., Cromie W.J., Karrison T.G., et al. Randomized, prospective, double-blind study of the effects on pain perception of lidocaine jelly versus plain lubricant during outpatient rigid cystoscopy. J Urol 157 (1997) 90-94
8. Huskisson E.C., Sturrock R.D., and Tugwell P. Measurement of patient outcome. Br J Rheumatol 22 (1983) 86-89
9. Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1 (1975) 277-299
10. Yoshimura R., Wada S., and Kishimoto T. Why the flexible cystoscope has not yet been widely introduced?. A questionnaire to Japanese urologists. Int J Urol 6 (1999) 549-559 discussion 560-541
11. Ho K.J., Thompson T.J., O'Brien A., et al. Lignocaine gel: does it cause urethral pain rather than prevent it?. Eur Urol 43 (2003) 194-196
12. Thompson T.J., Thompson N., O'Brien A., et al. To determine whether the temperature of 2% lignocaine gel affects the initial discomfort which may be associated with its instillation into the male urethra. BJU Int 84 (1999) 1035-1037
13. Birch B.R., Ratan P., Morley R., et al. Flexible cystoscopy in men: is topical anaesthesia with lignocaine gel worthwhile?. Br J Urol 73 (1994) 155-159
14. McFarlane N., Denstedt J., Ganapathy S., et al. Randomized trial of 10 mL and 20 mL of 2% intraurethral lidocaine gel and placebo in men undergoing flexible cystoscopy. J Endourol 15 (2001) 541-544
15. Herr H.W., and Schneider M. Outpatient flexible cystoscopy in men: a randomized study of patient tolerance. J Urol 165 (2001) 1971-1972
16. Choong S., Whitfield H.N., Meganathan V., et al. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study comparing lignocaine gel and plain lubricating gel in relieving pain during flexible cystoscopy. Br J Urol 80 (1997) 69-71
17. Palit V., Ashurst H.N., Biyani C.S., et al. Is using lignocaine gel prior to flexible cystoscopy justified?. A randomized prospective study. Urol Int 71 (2003) 389-392