Immunofluorescent analysis of meiotic recombination and interference in the domestic cat

Tsitologiya

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 62-66

  Borodin, P M ^a,b   Karamysheva, T V ^a   Rubtsov, N B ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF CYTOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Russian Federation)

^b NOVOSIBIRSK STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Crossing over; Interference; Meiosis; MLH1; Recombination; Synaptonemal complex

Indexed keywords

NUCLEAR PROTEIN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CAT; CELL NUCLEUS; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME; CROSSING OVER; CYTOLOGY; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; INTERFEROMETRY; MALE; MEIOSIS; METABOLISM; SPERMATOCYTE; SYNAPTONEMAL COMPLEX;

ANIMALS; CATS; CELL NUCLEUS; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOMES, MAMMALIAN; CROSSING OVER, GENETIC; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE, DIRECT; INTERFEROMETRY; MALE; MEIOSIS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SPERMATOCYTES; SYNAPTONEMAL COMPLEX;

EID: 41049111068     PISSN: 00413771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Russian source
2. Russian source
3. Russian source
4. Russian source
5. Anderson L. K., Reeves A., Webb L. M., Ashley 1999. Distribution of crossovers on mouse chromosomes using immunofluorescent localization of MLH1 protein. Genetics. 151: 1569-1579.
6. Baker S. M., Plug A. W., Prolla T. A., Bronner C. E., Harris A. C., Yao X., Christie D. M., Monell C., Arnheim N., Bradley A., Ashley T., Liskay R. M. 1996. Involvement of mouse Mlh1 in DNA mismatch repair and meiotic crossing over. Nat. Genet. 13: 336-342.
7. Borodin P. M., Belonogova N. M., Karamysheva T. V., Rubtsov N. B., Polyakov A. V., Searle J. B. 2006. Male shrew recombination maps for each chromosome identified by DAPI-banding. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 14 (Supplement 1): 181-182.
8. Broman K. W., Rowe L. B., Churchill G. A., Paigen K. 2002. Crossover interference in the mouse. Genetics, 160: 1123-1131.
9. Burt A., Bell G. 1987. Mammalian chiasma frequencies as a test of two theories of recombination. Nature. 326: 803-805.
10. Burt A., Bell C., Harvey P. H. 1991. Sex differences in recombination. J. Evol. Biol. 4: 259-277.
11. De Boer E., Stam P., Dietrich A. J. J., Pastink A., Heyting C. 2006. Two levels of interference in mouse meiotic recombination. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 103: 9607-9612.
12. Froenicke L., Anderson L. K., Wienberg J., Ashley T. 2002. Male mouse recombination maps for each autosome identified by chromosome painting. Amer. J. Hum. Genet. 71: 1353-1368.
13. Gillies C. B., Cowan S. K. 1985. The pachytene synaptonemal complex complement of the cat. Genetica. 67: 99-107.
14. Grahn R. A., Lemesch B. M., Millon L. V., Matise T., Rogers O. R., Morris J. G., Fretwell N., Bailey S. J., Batt R. M., Lyons L. A. 2005. Localizing the X-linked orange colour phenotype using feline resource families. Animal Generics. 36: 67-70.
15. Jones G. H., Franklin F. C. 2006. Meiotic crossing over: obligation and interference. Cell. 126: 246-248.
16. Koehler K. E., Cherry J. P., Lynn A., Hunt P. A., Hassold T. J. 2002. Genetic control of mammalian meiotic recombination. I. Variation in exchange frequencies among males from inbred mouse strains. Genetics. 162: 297-306.
17. Lynn A., Koehler K. E., Judis L., Chan E. R., Cherry J. P., Schwartz S., Seftel A., Hunt P. A., Hassold T. J. 2002. Covariation of synaptonemal complex length and mammalian meiotic exchange rates. Science. 296: 2222-2225.
18. Martin E., Diaz R. L., Hunter N., Keeney S. 2006. Crossover homeostasis in yeast meiosis. Cell. 126: 285-295.
19. McPeek M. S., Speed T. P. 1995. Modeling interference in genetic recombination. Genetics. 139: 1031-1044.
20. Menotti-Raymond M., David V. A., Roelke M. E., Chen Z. Q., Menotti K. A., Sun S., Schaffer A. A., Tomlin J. F., Agarwala R., O'Brien S. J., Murphy W. J. 2003. Second-generation integrated genetic linkage/radiation hybrid maps of the domestic cat (Felis catus). J. Hered 94: 95-106.
21. Otto S. P., Lenormand T. 2002. Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3: 252-361.
22. Page S. L., Hawley R. S. 2003. Chromosome choreography - the meiotic ballet. Science. 301: 785-789.
23. Peters A. H. F. M., Plug A. W., van Vugt M. J., de Boer P. 1997. A drying-down technique for spreading of mammalian spermatocytes from the male and female germline. Chrom. Res. 5: 66-71.
24. Peterson D. G., Stack S. M., Healy J. L., Donohoe B. S., Anderson L. K. 1994. The relationship between synaptonemal complex length and genome size four vertebrate classes (Osteicthyes, Reptilia, Aves, Mammalia). Chrom. Res. 2: 153-162.
25. Reeves A. 2001. Micromeasure: a new computer program for the collection and analysis of cytogenetic data. Genome. 44: 439-443.
26. Roeder G. S. 1997. Meiotic chromosomes: it takes two to tango. Genes and Development. 11: 2600-2621.
27. Ross-Ibarra J. 2004. The evolution of recombination under domestication: a test of two hypotheses. Amer. Nat. 163: 105-112.
28. Sun F., Oliver-Bonet M., Liehr T., Starke H., Ko E., Rademaker A., Navarro J., Benet J., Martin R. H. 2004. Human male recombination maps for individual chromosomes. Amer. J. Hum. Genet. 74: 521-531.
29. Sun F., Oliver-Bonet M., Liehr T., Starke H., Turek P., Ko E., Rademaker A., Martin R. H. 2006. Variation in MLH1 distribution in recombination maps for individual chromosomes from human males. Hum. Mol. Genet. 15: 2376-2391.
30. Vinogradov A. E. 1998. Genome size and GC-percent in vertebrates as determined by flow cytometry: the triangular relationship. Cytometry. 31: 100-109.
31. Zickler D., Kleckner N. 1999. Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. Annu. Rev. Genet. 33: 603-754.