Patchy villous atrophy in adult patients with suspected gluten-sensitive enteropathy: Is a multiple duodenal biopsy strategy appropriate?

Endoscopy

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 219-224

  Hopper, Andy D ^a,c   Cross, S S ^b   Sanders, D S ^a  

^a ROYAL HALLAMSHIRE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENDOMYSIUM ANTIBODY; PROTEIN GLUTAMINE GAMMA GLUTAMYLTRANSFERASE ANTIBODY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANTIBODY DETECTION; ANTIBODY TITER; ARTICLE; CELIAC DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE SEVERITY; DUODENUM BIOPSY; ENDOSCOPE; FEMALE; GASTROSCOPY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTESTINE VILLUS ATROPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATROPHY; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CELIAC DISEASE; DUODENUM; ENDOSCOPY; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 40949160200     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-995361     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Revised criteria for diagnosis of coeliac disease. Report of working group of European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. Arch Dis Child 1990; 65: 909-911
2. United European Gastroenterology. When is a coeliac a coeliac? Report of a working group of the United European Gastroenterology Week in Amsterdam, 2001. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2001; 13: 1123-1128
3. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on Celiac Disease, June 28-30, 2004. Gastroenterology 2005; 128 (4 Supp] 1): S1-S9
4. Achkar E, Carey WD, Petras R et al. Comparison of suction capsule and endoscopic biopsy of small bowel mucosa. Gastrointest Endosc 1986; 32: 278-281
5. Gillberg R, Ahren C. Coeliac disease diagnosed by means of duodenoscopy and endoscopic duodenal biopsy. Scand J Gastroenterol 1977; 12: 911-916
6. Mee AS, Burke M, Vallon AG et al. Small bowel biopsy for malabsorption: comparison of the diagnostic adequacy of endoscopic forceps and capsule biopsy specimens. BMJ 1985; 291: 769-772
7. Meijer JW, Wahab PJ, Mulder CJ. Small intestinal biopsies in celiac disease: duodenal or jejunal? Virchows Arch 2003; 442: 124-128
8. Thijs WJ, van Baarlen J, Kleibeuker JH, Kolkman JJ. Duodenal versus jejunal biopsies in suspected celiac disease. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 993-996
9. Shidrawi RG, Przemioslo R, Davies DR et al. Pitfalls in diagnosing coeliac disease. J Clin Pathol 1994; 47: 693-694
10. Brocchi E, Corazza GP, Brusco G et al. Unsuspected celiac disease diagnosed by endoscopic visualization of duodenal bulb micronodules. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 610-611
11. Vogelsang H, Hanel S, Steiner B, Oberhuber G. Diagnostic duodenal bulb biopsy in celiac disease. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 336-340
12. Bonamico M, Mariani P, Thanasi E et al. Patchy villous atrophy of the duodenum in childhood celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2004; 38: 204-207
13. Macdonald WC, Brandborg LL, Flick AL et al. Studies of celiac sprue IV: the response of the whole length of the small bowel to a gluten-free diet. Gastroenterology 1964; 47: 573-589
14. Horoldt BS, McAlindon ME, Stephenson TJ et al. Making the diagnosis of celiac disease: is there a role for push enteroscopy? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 16: 1143-1146
15. Ravelli A, Bolognini S, Gambarotti M, Villanacci V. Variability of histologic lesions in relation to biopsy site in gluten-sensitive enteropathy. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 177-185
16. Olds G, McLoughlin P, O'Morian C, Sivak MV Jr. Celiac disease for the endoscopist. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 407-415
17. Oberhuber G, Granditsch G, Vogelsang H. The histopathology of coeliac disease: time for a standardized report scheme for pathologists. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999; 11: 1185-1194
18. Serra S, Jani PA. An approach to duodenal biopsies. J Clin Pathol 2006; 59: 1133-1150
19. Dickson BC, Streutker CJ, Chetty R. Coeliac disease: an update for pathologists. J Clin Pathol 2006; 59: 1008-1016
20. Nenna R, Thanasi E, Luparia RPL et al. Duodenal bulb biopsies in celiac disease: a multicenter study. Proceedings of the XIIth International Celiac Disease Symposium; 2006 November 9-11; New York City, New York USA. D-108:15
21. Hopper AD, Cross SS, Hurlstone DP et al. Pre-endoscopy serological testing for coeliac disease: evaluation of a clinical decision tool. BMJ 2007; 334: 729
22. Hin H, Bird G, Fisher P et al. Coeliac disease in primary care: case finding study. BMJ 1999; 318: 164-167
23. Fasano A, Berti I, Gerarduzzi T et al. Prevalence of celiac disease in atrisk and not-at-risk groups in the United States: a large multicenter study. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 286-292
24. Scott BB, Losowsky MS. Patchiness and duodenal-jejunal variation of the mucosal abnormality in coeliac disease and dermatitis herpetiformis. Gut 1976; 17: 984-992
25. Ciclitira P. Interim guidelines for the management of patients with coeliac disease. British Society of Gastroenterology website 2002, http://www.bsg.org.uk/pdf_word_docs/coeliac.doc
26. Fine KD, Meyer RL, Lee EL. The prevalence and causes of chronic diarrhea in patients with celiac sprue treated with a gluten-free diet. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 1830-1838
27. Bardella MT, Fredella C, Saladino V et al. Gluten intolerance: gender-and age-related differences in symptoms. Scand J Gastroenterol 2005; 40: 15-19
28. Llorente-Alonso MJ, Fernandez-Acenero MJ, Sebastian M. Gluten intolerance: sex and age-related features. Can J Gastroenterol 2006; 20: 719-722
29. Niveloni S, Fiorini A, Dezi R et al. Usefulness of videoduodenoscopy and vital dye staining as indicators of mucosal atrophy of celiac disease: assessment of interobserver agreement. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 47: 223-229
30. Dickey W. Diagnosis of coeliac disease at open-access endoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 1998; 33: 612-615
31. Bardella MT. Minoli G, Radaelli F et al. Reevaluation of duodenal endoscopic markers in the diagnosis of celiac disease. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 714-716
32. Maurino F, Capizzano H, Niveloni S et al. Value of endoscopic markers in celiac disease. Dig Dis Sci 1993; 38: 2028-2033
33. Cammarota G, Cesaro P, La Mura R et al. Role of the "immersion technique" in diagnosing celiac disease with villous atrophy limited to the duodenal bulb. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007; 41: 571-575
34. Cammarota G, Cesaro P, Martino A et al. High accuracy and cost-effectiveness of a biopsy-avoiding endoscopic approach in diagnosing coe- liac disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 23: 61-69
35. Cammarota G, Cuoco L, Cesaro P et al. A highly accurate method for monitoring histological recovery in patients with celiac disease on a gluten-free diet using an endoscopic approach that avoids the need for biopsy: a double-center study. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 46-51
36. Kaukinen K, Maki M, Partanen J et al. Celiac disease without villous atrophy: revision of criteria called for. Dig Dis Sci 2001; 46: 879-887