How to incorporate the spatial dimension in destination choice models: The case of Antwerp

Transportation Planning and Technology

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 153-181

  Hammadou, Hakim ^a   Thomas, Isabelle ^a,b   Verhetsel, Ann ^c   Witlox, Frank ^d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b National Fund for Scientific Rsearch   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^d GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Antwerp; Destination choice model; Land use; Mixed nested logit; Trip based approach; Urban mobility

Indexed keywords

LAND USE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PLANNING; STATISTICAL METHODS; URBAN PLANNING;

DESTINATION CHOICE MODEL; MIXED NESTED LOGIT; SPATIAL DIMENSION; URBAN MOBILITY;

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION;

AGGLOMERATION; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; LAND USE; LOGIT ANALYSIS; MOBILITY; MODELING; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TRANSPORTATION POLICY; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN TRANSPORT;

ANTWERP [BELGIUM]; BELGIUM; BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 40949096010     PISSN: 03081060     EISSN: 10290354     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03081060801948126     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Badoe, D. A. and Miller, E. J. (2000) Transportation-land-use interaction: Empirical findings in North America and their implications for modelling. Transportation Research D, 5, pp. 235-263.
2. Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S. R. (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA), London (UK)
3. Bhat, C. R. and Guo, J. (2004) A mixed spatially correlated logit model: Formulation and application to residential choice modeling. Transportation Research B, 38:2, pp. 147-168.
4. Bhat, C. R. and Zhao, H. (2002) The spatial analysis of activity stop generation. Transportation Research B, 36:7, pp. 593-616.
5. Bierlaire, M. (2007) An Introduction to BIOGENE 1.5.
6. Cascetta, E. (2001) Transportation Systems Engineering: Theory and Methods, Applied Optimization, 49, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
7. Cervero, R. (1996) Mixed land-use and commuting: Evidence from the American housing survey. Transportation Research A, 30:5, pp. 361-377.
8. Cervero, R. and Knockelman, K. (1997) Travel demand and the 3D's: Density, diversity and design. Transportation Research D, 2:3, pp. 199-219.
9. Cramer, J. S. (1991) The Logit Model: An Introduction for Economists, Edward Arnold), London, UK
10. Dijst, M. and Vidakovic, V. (1997) Individual action-space in the city. Activity-based Approaches to Travel Analysis, pp. 117-134. Pergamon, Oxford, UK
11. Domencich, T. and McFadden, D. (1975) Urban Travel Demand: A Behavioural Analysis, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
12. Ewing, R. and Cervero, R. (2001) Travel and the built environment: A synthesis. Transportation Research Record, 1780, pp. 87-114.
13. Gaudry, M. and Dagenais, M. (1979) Heteroscedaticity and the use of Box - Cox transformations. Economics Letters, 2, pp. 225-229.
14. Hammadou, H., Thomas, I., Van Hofstraeten, D. and Verhetsel, A. (2003) Distance decay in activity chains analysis. A Belgian case study. Across the Border. Building upon a Quarter Century of Transport Research in the Benelux, pp. 1-26. De Boeck, Antwerp, Belgium
15. Handy, S., Cao, X. and Mokhtarian, P. (2005) Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transportation Research D, 10, pp. 427-444.
16. Hensher, D. A. and Greene, W. (2002) Specification and estimation of the nested logit model: Alternative normalisations. Transportation Research B, 36, pp. 1-17.
17. Hensher, D. A. and Johnson, L. W. (1981) Applied Discrete-Choice Modelling, Croon Helm, London, UK
18. Hensher, D. A. and Johnson, L. W. (1981) Behavioural response and form of the representative component of the indirect utility function in travel mode choice. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 11, pp. 559-572.
19. Johnson, N. L. and Kotz, S. (1970) Continuous Univariate Distributions-1, Houghton Mifflin Company, New York, NY
20. Kitamura, R. (2004) Spatial processes. Handbook of Transport Geography and Spatial Systems, pp. 513-531. Elsevier, Oxford, UK
21. Koppelman, F. S. and Sethi, V. (2000) Closed-form discrete-choice models. Handbook of Transport Modelling, pp. 211-227. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK
22. McFadden, D. (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. Frontiers in Econometrics, pp. 105-142. Academic Press, New York, NY
23. McFadden, D. (1976) Quantal choice analysis: A survey. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5:4, pp. 363-390.
24. Miller, E. (2004) Intergrated land use/transport model requirements. Handbook of Transport Geography and Spatial Systems, pp. 147-165. Elsevier), Oxford, UK
25. Miller, H. J. (1999) Potential contributions of spatial analysis to Geographic Information Systems for Transportation (GIS-T). Geographical Analysis, 31, pp. 373-399.
26. NIS (2001) Bevolking van het Rijksregister op 1 Januari 2001
27. OC-GIS Vlaanderen (2002) Bodembedekkings-en Bodemgebruiksbestand
28. Openshaw, S. and Taylor, P. J. (1979) A million or so correlated coefficients: Three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem. Statistical Applications in the Spatial Sciences, pp. 124-144. Pion, London, UK
29. Ortuzar, J. D. and Willumsen, L. G. (2001) Modelling Transport, Wiley, Chichester, UK
30. Papola, A. (2004) Some developments on the cross-nested logit model. Transportation Research B, 38:9, pp. 833-851.
31. Picard, G. and Gaudry, M. (1998) Exploration of a Box - Cox logit model of intercity freight mode choice. Transportation Research E, 34, pp. 1-12.
32. Quinet, E. and Vickerman, R. (2004) Principles of Transport Economics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
33. Slavin, H. (2004) The role of GIS in land use and transport planning. Handbook of Transport Geography and Spatial Systems, pp. 329-356. Elsevier, Oxford, UK
34. Stead, D. (2001) Relationships between land use, socio-economic factors and travel patterns in Britain. Environment and Planning B, 28:4, pp. 499-529.
35. Suarez, A., Bosque, I. Rodriguez del, Rodrigues-Poo, J. and Moral, I. (2004) Accounting for heterogeneity in shopping, centre choice models. Retailing and Consumer Services, 11, pp. 119-129.
36. Tindemans, H., Van Hofstraeten, D., Verhetsel, A. and Witlox, F. (2005) SAMBA: Spatial analysis and modelling based on activities: A pilot study for Antwerp and Ghent (Flanders, Belgium). Travel/Mobility and Urban Form, pp. 61-82. Ashgate Publishers, London, UK
37. Train, K. (2003) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
38. Train, K. and McFadden, D. (2000) Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15, pp. 447-470.
39. Van Acker, V., Witlox, F. and Van Wee, B. (2007) The effects of the land use system on travel behaviour: Towards a new research approach. Transportation Planning and Technology, 30:4, pp. 331-353.
40. Van der Haegen, H., Van Hecke, E. and Juchtmans, G. (1996) De Belgische Stadsgewesten in 1991, 104, Nationaal Instituut voor de Statistiek, Statistische Studiën, Brussel, Belgium
41. Van Hofstraeten, D. and Verhetsel, A. (2004) De introductie van ruimtelijke variabelen en zoneringstechnieken in de analyse van het verplaatsingsgedrag.
42. Van Wee, B. (2002) Land use and transport: Research and policy challenges. Journal of Transport Geography, 10, pp. 259-271.
43. Verhetsel, A., Van Hofstraeten, D. and Kandil, I. (2005) Ruimtelijke analyse van de bestemmingskeuze van personen: Een gevalstudie voor het Antwerpse stadsgewest. Tijdschrift Vervoerswetenschappen, 41:3, pp. 2-8.
44. Witlox, F. (2007) Evaluating the reliability of reported distance data in urban travel behaviour analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, 15:3, pp. 172-183.
45. Witlox, F. and Tindemans, H. (2004) The application of rough sets analysis in activity-based modelling. Opportunities and constraints. Expert Systems with Applications, 27:4, pp. 585-592.