Consideration of exposure and species sensitivity of triclosan in the freshwater environment

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 15-23

  Capdevielle, Marie ^a   Van Egmond, Roger ^b   Whelan, Mick ^c   Versteeg, Donald ^d   Hofmann Kamensky, Matthias ^e   Inauen, Josef ^e   Cunningham, Virginia ^f   Woltering, Daniel ^g  

^a Oral Care Research and Development   (United States)

^b UNILEVER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^c CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY   (United States)

^e CIBA GEIGY LTD   (Switzerland)

^f GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United States)

^g NONE

Author keywords

Triclosan aquatic risk assessment species sensitivity distribution probabilistic exposure assessment

Indexed keywords

FRESH WATER; TOPICAL ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; TRICLOSAN;

ALGA; ANIMAL; ARACEAE; ARTICLE; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM; EUROPE; FISH; INVERTEBRATE; NORTH AMERICA; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; THEORETICAL MODEL; WATER POLLUTANT;

ALGAE; ANIMALS; ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS, LOCAL; ARACEAE; EUROPE; FISHES; FRESH WATER; INVERTEBRATES; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NO-OBSERVED-ADVERSE-EFFECT LEVEL; NORTH AMERICA; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TRICLOSAN; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 40949088667     PISSN: 15513793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1897/IEAM_2007-022.1     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Adolfsson-Erici M, Pettersson M, Parkkonen J, Sturve J. 2002. Triclosan, a commonly used bactericide found in human milk and in the aquatic environment in Sweden. Chemosphere 46:1485-1489.
2. Anderson PD, D́Aco VJ, Shanahan P, Chapra SC, Buzby ME, Cunningham VL, Duplessie BM, Hayes EP, Mastrocco FJ, Parke NJ, Rader JC, Samuelian JH, Schwab BW. 2004. Screening analysis of human pharmaceutical compounds in U.S. surface waters. Environ Sci Technol 38:838-849.
3. Aranami K, Readman J. 2007. Photolytic degradation of triclosan in freshwater and seawater. Chemosphere 66:1052-1056.
4. Bester K. 2003. Triclosan in a sewage treatment process-balances and monitoring data. Water Res 37:3891-3896.
5. Bester K. 2005. Fate of triclosan and triclosan-methyl in sewage treatment plants and surface waters. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 49:9-17.
6. Boeije GM, Wagner J-O, Koormann F, Vanrolleghem PA, Schowanek DR, Feijtel TCJ. 2000. New PEC definitions for river basins applicable to GIS-based environmental exposure assessment. Chemosphere 40:255-265.
7. Canesi L, Ciacci C, Lorusso LC, Betti M, Gallo G, Pojana G, Marcomini A. 2007. Effects of triclosan on Mytilus galloprovincialis hemocyte function and digestive gland enzyme activities: Possible modes of action on non target organisms. Comp Biochem Physiol Chem Toxicol Pharmacol 145:464-472.
8. Cohn VH. 1979. Transmembrane movement of drug molecules. In: La Du BN, Mandel HG, Way EL, editors. Fundamentals of drug metabolism and drug disposition. New York (NY): Robert E. Krieger. p 3-16.
9. Coogan MA, Edziyie RE, LaPoint TW, Venables BJ. 2007. Algal bioaccumulation of triclocarban, triclosan and methyl-triclosan in a North Texas wastewater treatment plant receiving stream. Chemosphere 67:1911-1918.
10. Dayan A. 2007. Risk assessment of triclosan (Irgasant) in human breast milk. Food Chem Toxicol 45:125-129.
11. Dussault E, Solomon K, Sibley P. 2004. Aquatic toxicity of carbamazepine, atorvastatin and triclosan to benthic invertebrates [poster]. In: Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) 25th Annual Meeting; 2004 Nov 14-18; Portland, OR. Pensacola (FL): SETAC. Poster IP006.
12. [EC] European Commission. 2000. IUCLID Dataset on 2, 4-dichlorophenol: CAS No. 120-83-2, February 18, European Chemicals Bureau. European Commission. 58 p.
13. [EC] European Commission. 2003. Technical guidance document on risk assessment in support of Directive 93/67/EEC (new notified substances) and Regulation 1488/94 (existing substances). European Chemicals Bureau- Institute for Health and Consumer Protection. Part II. 328 p.
14. [EC] European Commission. 2002. Health and Consumer Protection Directorate General, Opinion on Triclosan Resistance. June 2002. Brussels (BE): EC. Section V1.1.
15. Emans HJB, van de Plassche EJ, Canton JH, Okkerman PC, Sparenburg PM. 1993. Validation of some extrapolation methods used for effect assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 12:2139-2154.
16. [EUFRAM] European Framework for Probabilistic Risk Assessment of the Environmental Impacts of Pesticides. 2005. Introducing probabilistic methods into the ecological risk assessment of pesticides. Draft EUFRAM Report, Vol 1, Ver 6. York (UK): Central Science Laboratory.
17. Federle TW, Schwab EL. 2003. Triclosan biodegradation in wastewater treatment plant effluent diluted in various river waters. 103rd American Society for Microbiology General Meeting; 2003; Washington, DC.
18. Feijtel TCJ, Boeije G, Matthies M, Young A, Morris G, Gandolfi C, Hansen B, Fox K, Holt M, Koch V, Schroeder R, Cassani G, Schowanek D, Rosenblom J, Niessen H. 1997. Development of a geographically-referenced regional exposure assessment tool for European river-GREAT-ER. Chemosphere 34:2351-2374.
19. Ferrari B, Paxeus N, Pinto G, Pollio A, Andreozzi R, Marotta R, Vogna D, Lyberatos G, Garric J. 2002. Fate and effect of triclosan in the aquatic ecosystems: data for a risk assessment [poster]. In: Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Annual Meeting in Europe; 2002 May 12-16; Vienna, Austria. Brussels (BE): SETAC Europe. Poster 73-04.
20. Foran CM, Bennett ER, Benson WH. 2000. Developmental evaluation of a potential non-steroidal estrogen: Triclosan. Marine Environ Res 50:153-156.
21. Gandolfi C, Facchi A, Whelan MJ, Cassani G, Tartari G, Marcomini A. 2000. Validation of the GREAT-ER model in the Lambro catchment. CLER Review 6:82-91.
22. Heidler J, Halden RU. 2006. Mass balance assessment of triclosan removal during conventional sewage treatment. Chemosphere 66:362-369.
23. Holt MS, Fox KK, Daniel M, Buckland H. 2003. Linear alkylbenzene sulfonate and boron monitoring in four catchments in the UK. Contribution to GREAT-ER #11. Sci Total Environ 314-316:271-288.
24. Hose GC, Van den Brink PJ. 2004. Confirming the species sensitivity concept for endosulfan using laboratory, mesocosm, and field data. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 47:511-520.
25. Ishibashi H, Matsumura N, Hirano M, Matsuoka M, Shiratsuchi H, Ishibashi Y, Takao Y, Arizono K. 2004. Effects of triclosan on the early life stages and reproduction of medaka Oryzias latipes and induction of hepatic vitellogenin. Aquat Toxicol 67:167-179.
26. Keller V, Rees HG, Fox KK, Whelan M.J. 2007. A practical approach for estimating the concentrations of down-the-drain chemicals locally and regionally: An application in England and Wales. Environ Pollut 148:334-342.
27. Kolpin DW, Furlong ET, Meyer MT, Thurman EM, Zaugg SD, Barber LB, Buxton HT. 2002. Pharmaceuticals, hormones and other organic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999-2000: A national reconnaissance. Environ Sci Technol 36:1202-1211.
28. Koormann F, Rominger J, Schowanek D, Wagner J-O, Schroder R, Wind T, Silvani M, Whelan MJ. 2006. Modelling the fate of down-the-drain chemicals in rivers: An improved software for GREAT-ER. Environmental Modelling & Software 21:925-936.
29. Latch DE, Packer JL, Stender BL, VanOverbek J, Arnold WA, McNeill K. 2005. Aqueous photochemistry of triclosan: Formation of 2, 4-dichlorophenol, 2, 8- dichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, and oligomerization products. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:517-525.
30. McAvoy DC, Schatowitz B, Jacob M, Hauk A, Eckoff WS. 2002. Measurement of triclosan in wastewater treatment systems. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:1323- 1329.
31. Morrall D, McAvoy D, Schatowitz B, Inauen J, Jacob M, Hauk A, Eckhoff W. 2004. A field study of triclosan loss rates in river water (Cibolo Creek, TX). Chemosphere 54:653-660.
32. [OECD] Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2005. OECD SIDS Initial Assessment Report of LAS. In: 20th SIAM meeting; 19-21 April 2005; Paris, France. Washington, DC: Council for LAB/LAS Environmental Research. The CLER Review, 10, December 2005. 104 p.
33. Orvos DR, Versteeg DJ, Inauen J, Capdevielle M, Rothenstein A, Cunningham V. 2002. Aquatic toxicity of triclosan. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:1338-1349.
34. Reiss R, Mackay N, Habig C, Griffin J. 2002. An ecological risk assessment for triclosan in lotic systems following discharge from wastewater treatment plants in the United States. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:2483-2492.
35. Sabaliunas D, Webb SF, Hauk A, Jacob M, Eckhoff WS. 2003. Environmental fate of triclosan in the River Aire basin, UK. Water Res 37:3145-3154.
36. Sanchez-Prado L, Llompart M, Lores M, Garcia-Jares C, Bayona JM, Cela R. 2006. Monitoring the photochemical degradation of triclosan in wastewater by UV light and sunlight using solid-phase microextraction. Chemosphere 65:1338- 1347.
37. Schröder R, Schulze C, Matthies M. 2002. Concentration of LAS and boron in the Itter. Comparison of measured data with results obtained by simulation with the GREAT-ER software. Environ Sci Pollut Res 9:130-135.
38. Singer H, Muller S, Tixier C, Pillonel L. 2002. Triclosan: Occurrence and fate of a widely used biocide in the aquatic environment: Field measurements in wastewater treatment plants, surface waters, and lake sediments. Environ Sci Technol 36:4998-5004.
39. Straub J, Stewart K. 2007. Deterministic and probabilistic acute-based environmental risk assessment for naproxen for Western Europe. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:795-806.
40. Struijs J, van den Berg R. 1995. Standardized biodegradability tests: Extrapolation to aerobic environments. Water Res 29:255-262.
41. Tatarazako N, Ishibashi H, Teshima K, Kishi K, Arizono K. 2004. Effects of triclosan on various aquatic organisms. Environ Sci 11:130-133.
42. Thompson A, Griffen P, Stuetz R, Cartmell E. 2005. The fate and removal of triclosan during wastewater treatment. Water Environ Res 77:63-67.
43. Tixier C, Singer HP, Canonica S, Muller SR. 2002. Phototransformation of triclosan in surface waters: A relevant elimination process for this widely used biocide- Laboratory studies, field measurements, and modeling. Environ Sci Technol 36:3482-3489.
44. [USACE] US Army Corps of Engineers. 2006. Environmental Effects Residue Database. http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/ered/index.html#misc. Accessed 24 August 2007.
45. [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 1998. Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. Risk assessment forum. Washington DC: Office of Research and Development. EPA/630/R-95/002F.
46. [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. Ambient aquatic life water quality criteria for atrazine. Washington DC: Office of Water. EPA-822-R-03- 023.
47. van Straalen NM. 2002. Theory of ecological risk assessment based on species sensitivity distributions. In: Posthuma L, Suter GW II, Traas TP, editors. Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology. Boca Raton (FL): Lewis. p 37-48.
48. Veldhoen N, Skirrow RC, Osachoff H, Wigmore H, Clapson DJ, Gunderson MP, Van Aggelen G, Helbing CC. 2006. The bacterial agent triclosan modulates thyroid hormone-associated gene expression and disrupts postembryonic anuran development. Aquat Toxicol 80:217-227.
49. Versteeg DJ, Belanger S, Carr CJ. 1999. Understanding single species and model ecosystem sensitivity: A data based comparison. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:1329-1346.
50. Waltman E, Venables B, Waller W. 2006. Triclosan in a North Texas wastewater treatment plant and the influent and effluent of an experimental constructed wetland. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:367-372.
51. Warn AE, Brew JS. 1980. Mass balance. Water Res 14:1427-1434.
52. White KL, Haggard BE, Matlock MD, Kim JW. 2005. Periphytic chlorophyll-a response to triclosan exposure application of a passive diffusion periphytometer. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 21:307-311.
53. Wilson BA, Smith VH, Denoyelles F, Larive CK. 2003. Effects of three pharmaceutical and personal care products on natural freshwater algal assemblages. Environ Sci Technol 37:1713-1719.