Hypnotizability and imagery modality preference: Do highs and lows live in the same world?

Contemporary Hypnosis

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 64-75

  Carli, Giancarlo ^a   Cavallaro, Francesca I ^a   Santarcangelo, Enrica L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Body sway; Hypnotizability; Imagery; Sensory modalities; Sensory motor integration

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BODY EQUILIBRIUM; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GUIDED IMAGERY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPNOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; SUGGESTION; TACTILE STIMULATION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 40849151893     PISSN: 09605290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ch.331     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Agargun MY, Tekeoglu I, Kara H, Adak B, Ercan M (1998) Hypnotizability, pain threshold, and dissociative experiences. Biological Psychiatry 44: 69-71.
2. Andersson G, Hagman J, Talianzadeh R, Svedberg A, Larsen HC (2002) ffect of cognitive load on postural control. Brain Research Bulletin 58: 135-9.
3. Balasubramaniam R, Wing AM (2002) The dynamics of standing balance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6: 531-6.
4. Bartolomeo P (2002) he relationship between visual perception and visual mental imagery: a reappraisal of the neuropsychological evidence. Cortex 38: 357-78.
5. Bensafi WM, Porter J, Pouliot S, Mainland J, Johnson B, Zelano C.Young N, Bremner E, Aframian D, Khan R, Sobel N (2003) Olfactory activity during imagery mimics that during perception. Nature Neuroscience 6: 1142-44.
6. Berridge CW, Waterhouse BD (2003) The locus coeuruleus-noradrenergic system: modulation of behavioral state and state-dependent cognitive processes. Brain Research Review 42: 33-84.
7. Betts GH (1909) The Dstribution and Fnctions of Mntal Iagery. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
8. Brodal P, Bjaalie JG, Aas JE (1991) Organization of cingulo-ponto-cerebellar connections in the cat. Anatomy and Embryology 184: 245-54.
9. Bryant RA, Mallard R (2003) Seeing is believing: the reality of hypnotic hallucinations. Consciousness and Cognition 12: 219-30.
10. Carli G, Cavallaro FI. Rendo CA Santarcangelo EL (2007) magery of different sensory modalities: hypnotizability and body sway. Experimental Brain Research (in press).
11. Carli G, Rendo CA, Sebastiani L, Santarcangelo EL (2006) Suggestions of altered balance: possible equivalence of imagery and perception. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 54: 206-23.
12. Council JR, Green JP (2004) Examining the absorption-hypnotizability link: the roles of acquiescence and consistency motivation. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 52: 364-77.
13. Council JR, Kirsch I, Hafner LP (1986) Expectancy versus absorption in the prediction of hypnotic responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 182-9.
14. Crawford HJ, Brown AM, Moon CE (1993) ustained attentional. and disattentional abilities: differences between low- and high hypnotizable persons. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 102: 534-43.
15. Crawford HJ (1982) Hypnotizability, daydreaming styles, imagery vividness, and absorption: a multidimensional study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42: 915-26.
16. Crawford HJ (1994) Brain dynamics and hypnosis: attentional and disattentional processes. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 42: 204-32.
17. Crawford HJ (1989) ognitive and physiological flexibility: multiple pathways to hypnotic responsiveness. In V Gheorgiu, P Nette, H Eysenck, R Rosenthal (eds) Suggestion and Suggestibility: Theory and Research. New York: Plenum Press, 155-68.
18. Djordievic J, Zatorre RJ, Petrides M, Jones-Gotman M (2004) The mind's nose: effects of odor and visual imagery on odor detection. Psychological Sciences 15: 143-8.
19. Egner T, Jamieson G, Gruzelier J (2005) Hypnosis decouples cognitive control from conflict monitoring processes of the frontal lobe. NeuroImage 27: 969-78.
20. Ericcson AK, Simon HA (1993) Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
21. Gage WH, Winter DA, Frank JS, Adkin AL (2004) Kinematic and kinetic validity of the inverted pendulum model in quiet standing. Gait & Posture 19: 124-32.
22. Ganis G, Thompson WL, Kosslyn SM (2004) rain areas underlying visual mental imagery and visual perception: an fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research 20: 226-41.
23. Gemignani A, Tosetti M, Montanaro D, Biagi L, Ghelarducci B, Guazzelli M, Santarcangelo EL (2004) Sensory-motor cortex activity modulation by hypnotic susceptibility and hypnosis during finger movement. Archives Italiennes de Biologie 142: 77-85.
24. Glisky ML, Tataryn DJ, Kihlstrom J (1995) Hypnotizability and mental imagery. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 43: 34-54.
25. Gruzelier JH (1998) Working model of the neurophysiology of hypnosis: a review of evidence. Contemporary Hypnosis 5: 3-21.
26. Heer M, Paloski WH, (2006) Spatial motion sickness: incidence, etiology, and countermeasures. Automatic neuroscience: Basic and Clinical, 129: 77-79.
27. Ito M (1981) The Cerebellum and Neural Control. New York: Raven Press.
28. Kogon MM, Jasiukaitis P, Berardi A, Gupta M, Kosslyn SM, Spiegel D (1998) Imagery and hypnotizability revisited. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 46: 363-70.
29. Lajoie Y, Teasdale H, Bard C, Fleury M (1993) Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium. Experimental Brain Research 97: 139-44.
30. Lequerica A, Rapport L, Axelrod BN, Telmer K, Whitman RD (2002) Subjective and objective assessment methods of mental imagery control: construct validation of self-report measures. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 24: 1103-16.
31. Lynn SJ, Ruhe JW (1986) The fantasy-prone person: hypnosis, imagination, and creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 5: 404-8.
32. Lyons LC, Crawford HJ (1997) Sustained attentional and disattentional abilities and arousability: factor analysis and relationships to hypnotic susceptibility. Personality and Individual Differences 23: 652-4.
33. Manzoni D (2005) The cerebellum may implement the appropriate coupling of sensory inputs and motor responses: evidence from vestibular physiology. Cerebellum 4: 78-88.
34. McConkey KM, Bryant RA, Bibb BC, Kihlstrom JF (1991) Trance logic in hypnosis and imagination. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 10: 464-72.
35. McNevin NH, Wulf G (2002) Attentional focus on supra-postural tasks affects postural control. Human Movement Sciences 21: 187-202.
36. Merabet LB, Swisher JD, McMain SA, Halko MA, Amedi A, Pascual-Leone A, Somers DC (2007) Combined activation and deactivation of visual cortex during tactile sensory processing. Journal of Neurophysiology 97: 1633-41.
37. Negyessy L, Nepusz T, Kocsis L, Bazso F (2006) Prediction of the main cortical areas and connections involved in the tactile function of the visual cortex by network analysis. European Journal of Neuroscience 23: 1919-130.
38. Pompeiano O (2001) Role of the locus coeruleus in the static and dynamic control of posture. Archives Italiennes de Biologie 139: 109-24.
39. Prather SC, Votaw JR, Sathian K (2004) Task-specific recruitment of dorsal and ventral visual areas during tactile perception. Neuropsychologia 42: 1079-87.
40. Price DD, Barrell JJ, Rainville P (2002) Integrating experiential-phenomenological methods and neuroscience to study neural mechanism of pain and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 11: 593-608.
41. Rainville P, Price DD (2003) Hypnosis phenomenology and the neurobiology consciousness. International Journal of clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 51: 105-29.
42. Ramnani N (2006) The primate cortico-cerebellar system: anatomy and function. Nature Reviews of Neuroscience 7: 511-22.
43. Raz A (2005) Attention and hypnosis: neural substrates and genetic associations of two converging processes. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 53: 237-58.
44. Santarcangelo EL, Rendo C, Carpaneto J, Dario P, Micera S, Carli G (2004) Does hypnotizability affect human upright stance? Archives Italiennes deBiologie 142: 285-96.
45. Santarcangelo EL, Scattina E, Orsini P, Bruschini L, Ghelarducci B, Manzoni D (2007) Effects of vestibular and neck proprioceptive stimulation on posture as a function of hypnotizability. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, in press
46. Teasdale N, Simoneau M (2001) Attentional demand for postural control: the effects of ageing and sensory reintegration. Gait & Posture 14: 203-21.
47. Tellegen A, Atkinson G (1974) Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences ('absorption'), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 83: 268-77.
48. Vuillerme N, Nougier V (2004) Demand for regulating postural sway: the effect of expertise in gymnastics. Brain Research Bulletin 63: 161-5.
49. Weeks DL, Forget R, Mouchnino L, Gravel D, Bourbonnais D (2003) Interaction between attention demanding motor and cognitive tasks and static postural stability. Gerontology 49: 225-32.
50. Weitzenhoffer AM, Hilgar E (1962) Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
51. Wilson SC, Barber TX (1982) The fantasy-prone personality: implications for understanding imagery, hypnosis, and parapsychological phenomena. Psychological Research 1: 94-116.
52. Woody E, Farvolden P (1998) Dissociation in hypnosis and frontal executive function. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 40: 206-16.
53. Woollacott MH, Shumway-Cook A (2002) Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait & Posture 16: 1-14.
54. 111, Jolesz FA (2003) Neural substrates of tactile imagery: a functional MRI study, NeuroReport 14: 581-5.
55. Zatorre RJ, Halpern AR (2005) Mental concerts: musical imagery and auditory cortex. Neuron 47: 9-12.
56. Zikopoulos B, Barbas H (2006) Prefrontal projections to the thalamic reticular nucleus form a unique circuit for attentional mechanisms. Journal of Neuroscience 26: 7348-61.