Suggestions of altered balance: Possible equivalence of imagery and perception

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 206-223

  Carli, Giancarlo ^a   Rendo, Carmela ^a   Sebastiani, Laura ^b   Santarcangelo, Enrica L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BALANCE IMPAIRMENT; BODY POSTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FALLING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPNOSIS; HYPNOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOTHERAPY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL EQUILIBRIUM; SUGGESTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33645548807     PISSN: 00207144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207140500528455     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Barabasz, A., Barabasz, M., Jensen, S., Calvin, S., Trevison, M., & Warner, D. (1999). Cortical event related potentials show the structure of hypnotic suggestions is crucial. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 47, 5-22.
2. Barabasz, A., & Lonsdale, C. (1983). Effects of hypnosis on P300 olfactory evoked potential amplitudes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92, 520-525.
3. Barabasz, A., & Watkins, H. (2005). Hypnotherapeutic techniques. (2nd ed.). New York: Brunner-Routledge.
4. Barber, J. (2000). Where Eriksonian legend meets scientific method: A comment on Matthews. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 48, 427-432.
5. Bartolomeo, P. (2002). The relationship between visual perception and visual mental imagery: A reappraisal of the neuropsychological evidence. Cortex, 38, 357-378.
6. Bensafi, M., Porter, J., Pouliot, S., Mainland, J., Johnson, B., Zelano, C., Young, N., Bremner, E., Aframian, A., Han, R., & Sobel, N. (2003). Olfactomotor activity during imagery mimics that during perception. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 1142-1144.
7. Blakemore, S. J., Oakley, D. A., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Delusions of alien control in the normal brain. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1058-1067.
8. Bryant, R. A., & Mallard, D. (2003). Seeing is believing: The reality of hypnotic hallucinations. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 219-230.
9. Calvin, S. (2000, October). ERP markers of Barabasz's instant alert hypnosis: Inductions and instructions make a difference. 51st Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society for Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, Seattle, WA, October 25-29.
10. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
11. Clark, S., Tremblay, F., & Ste-Marie, D. (2004). Differential modulation of corticospinal excitability during observation, mental imagery and imitation of hand actions. Neuropsychologia, 42, 105-112.
12. Decety, J. (1996). The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery. Behavioural Brain Research, 77, 45-52.
13. Djordjevic, J., Zatorre, R. J., Petrides, M., & Jones-Gotman, M. (2004). The mind's nose: Effects of odor and visual imagery on odor detection. Psychological Science, 15, 143-148.
14. Fourie, D. P. (1997). "Indirect" suggestion in hypnosis: Theoretical and experimental issue. Psychological Reports, 80, 1255-1266.
15. Gheorghiu, V. A., Gehm, T., Vaitl, D., & Hehl, F. J. (1989). Objective and simulated stimulation: An empirical study of the effects of indirect suggestion of motor behaviour. Archives Psychologie (Frankf), 141, 127-137.
16. Groth-Marnat, G., & Mitchell, K. (1998). Responsiveness to direct versus indirect hypnotic procedures: The role of resistance as a predictor variable. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 46, 324-333.
17. Halligan, P. W., Athwal, S. S., Oakley, D. A., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (2000). Imaging hypnotic paralysis: Implications for conversion hysteria. Lancet, 355, 986-987.
18. Hilgard, E. R., & Tart, C. T. (1966). Responsiveness to suggestions following waking and imagination instructions and following induction of hypnosis. Jounal of Abnormal Psychology, 71, 196-208.
19. Hugdahl, K., Rosen, G., Ersland, L., Lundervold, A., Smievoll, A. I., Barndon, R., & Thomsen, T. (2001). Common pathways in mental imagery and pain perception: An fMRI study of a subject with an amputated arm. Scandinavian Journal of Physiology, 42, 269-275.
20. Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor imagery and intention. Behavioural Brain Science, 17, 187-245.
21. Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14, 103-109.
22. Jensen, S., Barabasz, A., Barabasz, M., & Warner, D. (2001). EEG P300 event related markers of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 44, 127-139.
23. Kirsch, I. (1997). Suggestibility or hypnosis: What do our scales really measure?. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 45, 212-225.
24. Kosslyn, S. M., & Thompson, W. L. (2003). When is early visual cortex activated during visual mental imagery?. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 723-746.
25. Kosslyn, S., Thompson, W., Costantini-Ferrando, M., Alpert, N., & Spiegel, D. (2000). Hypnotic visual illusion alters color processing in the brain. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 1279-1284.
26. Liossi, C., & Hatira, P. (2003). Clinical hypnosis in the alleviation of procedure-related pain in pediatric oncology patients. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 51, 4-28.
27. Lotze, M., Montoya, P., Erb, M., Hulsmann, E., Flor, H., Klose, U., Birbaumer, N., & Grodd, W. (1999). Activation of cortical and cerebellar motor areas during executed and imagined hand movements: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 491-501.
28. Lynn, S. J., Neufeld, V., & Mare, C. (1993). Direct versus indirect suggestions: a Conceptual and methodological review. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 41, 124-152.
29. Maquet, P., Faymonville, M. E., Delguedre, C., Delfiore, G., Frank, G., Luxen, A., & Lamu, M. (1999). Functional neuroanatomy of hypnotic state. Biological Psychiatry, 45, 327-333.
30. Matthews, W. J. (2000). Ericksonian approaches to hypnosis and therapy: Where are we now? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 48, 418-426.
31. Mertz, S., Belkhenchir, S., & Lepecq, J. C. (2000). Evidence of imagined passive self-motion through imagery-perception interaction. Acta Psychologica, 105, 57-58.
32. Michelon, P., & Zacks, J. M. (2003). What is primed in priming from imagery? Psychological Research, 67, 71-79.
33. Naito, E., Kochiyama, T., Kitada, R., Nakamura, S., Matsumura, M., Yonekura, Y., & Sadato, N. (2002). Internally simulated movement sensations during motor imagery activate cortical motor areas and the cerebellum. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 3683-3691.
34. Porro, C. A., Francescato, M. P., Cettolo, V., Diamond, M. E., Baraldi, P., Zuiani, C., Bazzocchi, M., & Di Prampero, P.E. (1996). Primary motor and sensory cortex activation during motor performance and motor imagery: A functional magnetic resonance study. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 7688-7698.
35. Rainville, P., Hofbauer, R. K., Paus, T., Duncan, G. H., Bushnell, M. C., & Price, D. D. (1999). Cerebral mechanisms of hypnotic induction and suggestion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 110-125.
36. Santarcangelo, E. L., Busse, K., & Carli, G. (1989). Changes in electromyographically recorded human monosynaptic reflex in relation to hypnotic susceptibility and hypnosis. Neuroscience Letters, 104, 157-160.
37. Santarcangelo, E. L., Busse, K., & Carli, G. (2003). Frequency of occurrence of the F wave in distal flexor muscles as a function of hypnotic susceptibility and hypnosis. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 99-103.
38. Santarcangelo, E. L., Cavallaro, E., Mazzoleni, S., Marano, E., Ghelarducci, B., Dario, P., Micera, S., & Sebastiani, L. (in press). Kinematic strategies of upper limbs lowering during suggestions of heaviness: A real-simulator design. Experimental Brain Research.
39. Santarcangelo, E. L., Rendo, C., Carpaneto, J., Dario, P., Micera, S., & Carli, G. (2004). Does hypnotizability affect human up-right stance? Archives Italiennes de Biologie, 142, 287-298.
40. Schieppati, M., Tacchini, E., Nardone, A., Tarantola, J., & Corna, S. (1999). Subjective perception of body sway. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 66, 313-322.
41. Schwoebel, J., Boronat, C. B., & Coslett, H. B. (2002). The man who executed "imagined" movements: Evidence for dissociable components of the body schema. Brain and Cognition, 50, 1-16.
42. Shallice, T., & Burgess, P. W. (1991). Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain, 114, 727-741.
43. Spiegel, D. (2003). Negative and positive visual hypnotic hallucinations: Attending inside and out. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 51, 130-146.
44. Spiegel, D., Bierre, P., & Rootenberg, J. (1989). Hypnotic alteration of somatosensory perception. American Journal of Psychiatry, 146, 749-754.
45. Szechtman, H., Woody, E., Bowers, K. S., & Nahmias, C. (1998). Where the imaginal appears real: A positron emission tomography study of auditory hallucinations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 95, 1956-1960.
46. Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
47. Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Sjoberg, B. M., Jr. (1961). Suggestibility with and without "induction of hypnosis.". Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 132, 204-220.
48. Woody, E., & Farvolden, P. (1998). Dissociation in hypnosis and frontal executive function. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 40, 206-216.
49. Yoo, S. S., Freeman, D. K., McCarthy, J. J., 3rd, & Jolesz, F. A. (2003). Neural substrates of tactile imagery: A functional MRI study. NeuroReport, 24, 581-585.