Accuracy and reproducibility of computer-assisted measurement of polyethylene wear in knee arthroplasty

Acta Orthopaedica Belgica

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 72-82

  Massin, Philippe ^a   Heizmann, Jean ^a   Prove, Stéphane ^a   Dupuy, François Régis ^a   Ponthieux, Anne ^a  

^a ANGERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Calibration; Computer assisted measurements; Knee arthroplasty; Polyethylene wear; Reproducibility

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EQUIPMENT; INSTRUMENTATION; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; POLYETHYLENE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 40849145728     PISSN: 00016462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement : why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995 ; 346 : 1085-1087.
2. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986 ; 1 : 307-310.
3. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes : measurement error. BMJ 1996 ; 313 : 744-747.
4. Blunn GW, Joshi AB, Minns RJ et al. Wear in retrieved condylar knee arthroplasties. A comparison of wear in different designs of 280 retrieved condylar knee prostheses. J Arthroplasty 1997 ; 12 : 281-290.
5. Cadambi A, Engh GA, Dwyer KA, Vinh TN. Osteolysis of the distal femur after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1994 ; 9 : 579-594.
6. Collier MB, Jewett BA,Engh CA, Jr. Clinical assessment of tibial polyethylene thickness : comparison of radiographic measurements with as-implanted and as-retrieved thicknesses. J Arthroplasty 2003 ; 18 : 860-866.
7. Duryea J, Grainger AJ, Hide IG, Genant HK, Campbell RS. Fully automated software to monitor wear in prosthetic knees using fluoroscopic images. Eur Radiol 2001 ; 11 : 2184-2187.
8. Fregly BJ, Sawyer WG, Harman MK, Banks SA. Computational wear prediction of a total knee replacement from in vivo kinematics. J Biomech 2005 ; 38 : 305-314.
9. Hide IG, Grainger AJ, Wallace IW, Hui A, Campbell RS. A radiological technique for the assessment of wear in prosthetic knee replacements. Skeletal Radiol 2000 ; 29 : 583-586.
10. Hoshino A, Fukuoka Y, Ishida A. Accurate in vivo measurement of polyethylene wear in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002 ; 17 : 490-496.
11. Jones SM, Pinder IM, Moran CG, Malcolm AJ. Polyethylene wear in uncemented knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg 1992 ; 74-B : 18-22.
12. Kellett CF, Short A, Price A, Gill HS, Murray DW. In vivo measurement of total knee replacement wear. Knee 2004 ; 11 : 183-187.
13. Kim YH, Oh JH, Oh SH. Osteolysis around cementless porous-coated anatomic knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 1995 ; 77-B : 236-241.
14. Miura H, Higaki H, Nakanishi Y et al. Prediction of total knee arthroplasty polyethylene wear using the wear index. J Arthroplasty 2002 ; 17 : 760-766.
15. Moertel CG, Hanley JA. The effect of measuring error on the results of therapeutic trials in advanced cancer. Cancer 1976 ; 38 : 388-394.
16. Nolan JF, Bucknill TM. Aggressive granulomatosis from polyethylene failure in an uncemented knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1992 ; 74-B : 23-24.
17. Peters PC, Jr., Engh GA, Dwyer KA, Vinh TN. Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg 1992 ; 74-A : 864-876.
18. Price AJ, Short A, Kellett C et al. Ten-year in vivo wear measurement of a fully congruent mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 2005 ; 87-B : 1493-1497.
19. Sanzen L, Sahlstrom A, Gentz CF, Johnell IR. Radiographic wear assessment in a total knee prosthesis. 5- to 9-year follow-up study of 158 knees. J Arthroplasty 1996 ; 11 : 738-742.
20. Tsao A, Mintz L, McRae CR, Stulberg SD, Wright T. Failure of the porous-coated anatomic prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty due to severe polyethylene wear. J Bone Joint Surg 1993 ; 75-A : 19-26.