Putting multi-dimensionality back into niche: Diel vs. day-only niche breadth separation in stream fishes

Fundamental and Applied Limnology

Volumn 170, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 273-280

  Copp, Gordon H ^a  

^a CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Canonical correspondence analysis; Dietary diversity; Observational niche construction; Replicated point abundance sampling

Indexed keywords

AGE CLASS; DIEL VARIATION; DIET; FISH; HABITAT USE; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; NICHE BREADTH; STREAM;

ENGLAND; EURASIA; EUROPE; LEA RIVER; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

BARBATULA BARBATULA; BARBUS; BARBUS BARBUS; COTTUS GOBIO; CYPRINIDAE; GOBIO; GOBIO GOBIO; LEUCISCUS CEPHALUS; PHOXINUS PHOXINUS; PISCES;

EID: 40849124081     PISSN: 18639135     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1127/1863-9135/2008/0170-0273     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Arlinghaus, R., Mehner, T. & Cowx, I. G., 2002: Reconciling traditional inland fisheries management and sustainability in industrialized countries, with emphasis on Europe. - Fish & Fish. 3: 261-316.
2. Baras, E. & Nindaba, J., 1999: Diel dynamics of habitat use by riverine young-of-the-year Barbus barbus and Chondrostoma nasus (Cyprinidae). - Arch. Hydrobiol. 146: 431-448.
3. Chessel, D. & Thioulouse, J., 1998: ADE Version 4.0: Hyper-Card© Stacks and MicroSoft QuickBasic© Programme library for the analysis of environmental data. - Villeurbanne: Université Lyon I (http://biomserv.univ-lyon1.fr/ADE-4.html).
4. Copp, G. H., 1992: An empirical model for predicting the microhabitat of 0+ juveniles in lowland streams. - Oecologia 91: 338-345.
5. Copp, G. H. & Bennetts, A., 1996: Short-term effects of removing riparian and instream cover on barbel (Barbus barbus) and other fish populations in stretch of English chalk stream. - Folia Zool. 45: 283-288.
6. Copp, G. H. & Garner, P., 1995: Evaluating microhabitat use of fish larvae and juveniles with Point Abundance Sampling. - Folia Zool. 44: 145-158.
7. Copp, G. H., Spathari, S. & Turmel, M., 2005a: Consistency of diel behaviour and interactions of stream fishes and invertebrates during summer. - River Res. Appl. 21: 75-90.
8. Copp, G. H., Vranovský, M., Černý, J. & Kováč, V., 2005b: Diel dynamics of young fishes and zooplankton in a lentic side-channel of the River Danube. - Biología (Bratislava) 60: 179-188.
9. de Crispin de Billy, V., Dolédec, S. & Chessel, D., 2000: Biplot presentation of diet composition data: an alternative for fish stomach content analysis. - J. Fish Biol. 56: 961-973.
10. Declerck, S., Louette, G., de Bie, T. & de Meester, L., 2002: Patterns of diet overlap between populations of non-indigenous and native fishes in shallow ponds. - J. Fish Biol. 6:: 1182-1197.
11. Dolédec, S., Chessel, D. & Gimaret-Carpentier, C., 2000: Niche separation in community analysis: a new method. - Ecology 81: 2914-2927.
12. Dueser, R. D. & Shugart, H. H., 1979: Microhabitats in a forest-floor small-mammal fauna. - Ecology 59: 89-98.
13. Duncan, R. P., 1997: The role of competition and introduction effort in the success of Passeriform birds introduced to New Zealand. - Amer. Nat. 149: 903-915.
14. Elliot, M., 2003: Biological pollutants and biological pollution - an increasing cause for concern. - Mar. Pollut. Bull. 46: 275-280.
15. Elton, C., 1927: Animal Ecology. - Sidgwick & Jackson, London.
16. Garner, P., 1996: Diel patterns in the feeding and habitat use of 0-group fishes in a regulated river: The Great Ouse, England. - Ecol Freshwat. Fish 5: 175-182.
17. Gatz, A. J., 1979: Community organization in fishes as indicated by morphological features. - Ecology 60: 711-718.
18. Gewin, V., 2006: Beyond neutrality - Ecology finds its niche. - PLoS Biol. 4: 1306-1310.
19. Godinho, F. N., Ferreira, M. T. & Cortes, R. V., 1997: The environmental basis of diet variation in pumpkinseed sunfish, Lepomis gibbosus, and largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides, along an Iberian river basin. - Environ. Biol. Fish. 50: 105-115.
20. Green, R. H., 1971: A multivariate statistical approach to the Hutchinsonian niche: bivalve molluscs of central Canada. - Ecology 52: 543-556.
21. Grinnell, J., 1917: The niche-relationship of California thrasher. - Auk 34: 427-433.
22. Guisan, A., Broennimann, O., Engler, R., Vust, M., Yoccoz, N. G, Lehmann, A. & Zimmermann, N. E., 2006: Using niche-based models to improve the sampling of rare species. - Conserv. Biol. 20: 501-511.
23. Herbold, B. & Moyle, P. B., 1986: Introduced species and vacant niches. - Amer. Nat. 128: 751-760.
24. Hutchinson, G. E., 1944: Limnological studies in Connecticut. VII. A critical examination of the supposed relationship between phytoplankton periodicity and chemical changes in later waters. - Ecology 25: 3-26.
25. Lammens, E. H. H. R., de Nie, H. W., Vijverberg, J. & van Densen, W. L. T., 1985: Resource partitioning and niche shifts of bream (Abramis brama) and eel (Anguilla anguilla) mediated by predation of smelt (Osmerus eperlanus) on Daphnia hyalina. - Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42: 1342-1351.
26. Lebreton, J. D., Chessel, D., Prodon, R. & Yoccoz, N., 1988: L'analyse des relations espèces-milieu par l'analyses canonique des correspondances. I. Variables de milieu quantitatives. -Acta Œcol. Œcol. Gen. 9: 53-67.
27. Legendre, P., Borcard, D. & Peres-Neto, P. R., 2005: Analyzing beta diversity : partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. - Ecol. Monogr. 75: 435-450.
28. Levins, R., 1968: Evolution in changing environments: some theoretical explanations. - Princeton University Press, Princeton.
29. Litvak, M. O. K. & Hansell, R. I. C., 1990: Investigation of food habitat and niche relationships in a cyprinid community. - Can. J. Zool. 68: 1873-1879.
30. Mack, R. N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W. M., Evans, H., Clout, M. & Bazzaz, F. A., 2000: Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. - Ecol. Appl. 10: 689-710.
31. McKinney, M. L., 2004: Do exotics homogenize or differentiate communities? Roles of sampling and exotic species richness. - Biol. Invas. 6: 495-504.
32. Mercier, P., Chessel, D. & Dolédec, S., 1992: Complete correspondence analysis of an ecological profile table: a central ordination method. - Acta Œcol. Œcol. Gen. 13: 25-44.
33. Næsje, T. F., Jonsson, B., Sandlund, O. T. & Kjellberg, G., 1991: Habitat switch and niche overlap in coregonid fishes: effects of zooplankton abundance. - Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48: 2307-2315.
34. Nehring, S., 2002: Biological invasions into German Waters: an evaluation of the importance of different human-mediated vectors for nonindigenous macrozoobenthic species. - In: Leppäkaski E, Gollasch S, Olenin S (eds): Invasive Aquatic Species of Europe: Distributions, Impacts and Management. - Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 373-383.
35. Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N. & Feldman, M. W., 2003: Niche Construction - The neglected Process in Evolution. Monographs in Population Biology, No. 37. - Princeton University Press, Oxford, 472 pp.
36. Robotham, P. W. J., 1977: Feeding habits and diet in two populations of spined loach, Cobitis taenia (L.). - Freshwat. Biol. 7: 469-477.
37. Rodríguez, M. A. & Magnan, P., 1995: Application of multivariate analyses in studies of the organisation and structure of fish and invertebrate communities. - Aquat. Sci. 57: 199-216.
38. Rohde, K., 1991: Intra- and inter-specific interactions in low density populations in resource-rich habitats. - Oikos 60: 91-104.
39. Schlosser, I. J., Doeringsfeld, M. R., Elder, J. F. & Arzayus, L. F., 1998: Niche relationships of clonal and sexual fish in a heterogeneous landscape. - Ecology 79: 953-968.
40. Stott, B., 1977: On the question of the introduction of the grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella Val.) into the United Kingdom. - Fish. Manag. 8: 63-71.
41. ter Braak, C. J. F., 1986: Canonical Correspondence Analysis. A new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. - Ecology 67: 1167-1179.
42. ter Braak, C. J. F. & Verdonschot, P. F. M., 1995: Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. - Aquat. Sci. 57: 255-289.
43. Thioulouse, J. & Chessel, D., 1992: A method for reciprocal scaling of species tolerance and sample diversity. - Ecology 73: 670-680.
44. Wainwright, P. C. & Richard, B. A., 1995: Predicting patterns of prey use from morphology of fishes. - Environ. Biol. Fish. 44: 97-113.
45. Watson, D. J. & Balon, E. K., 1984: Ecomorphological analysis of fish taxocenes in rainforest streams of northern Borneo. - J. Fish Biol. 25: 371-384.
46. Welker, T. L. & Scarnecchia, D. L., 2006: River alteration and niche overlap among three native minnows (Cyprinidae) in the Missouri River hydrosystem. - J. Fish Biol. 68: 1530-1550.
47. Welton, J. S., Mills, C. A. & Rendle, E. L., 1983: Food and habitat partitioning in two small benthic fishes, Noemacheilus barbatulus (L.) and Cottus gobio L. - Arch. Hydrobiol. 97: 434-454.
48. Whittaker, R. H., 1972: Evolution and measurement of species diversity. - Taxon 21: 213-251.