Consistency of diel behaviour and interactions of stream fishes and invertebrates during summer

River Research and Applications

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 75-90

  Copp, G H ^a,b   Spathari, S ^a,c   Turmel, M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^b CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Barbel; Chub; Dietary overlap; European bullhead; Gudgeon; Mesotrophy; Microhabitat use; Minnow; Point abundance sampling; Predator prey interactions; Stone loach

Indexed keywords

DIEL VARIATION; DIETARY OVERLAP; ICHTHYOFAUNA; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION;

EASTERN HEMISPHERE; ENGLAND; EURASIA; EUROPE; LEA RIVER; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE; WORLD;

ANNELIDA; ASELLUS; BAETIS; BAETIS RHODANI; BARBATULA BARBATULA; BARBUS; BARBUS BARBUS; CHIRONOMIDAE; COTTUS; COTTUS GOBIO; EPHEMERELLA; EPHEMEROPTERA; GOBIO; GOBIO GOBIO; HYMENOPHYSA CURTA; INVERTEBRATA; LEUCISCUS; LEUCISCUS CEPHALUS; OSTRACODA; PHOXINUS; PHOXINUS PHOXINUS; PISCES; SIMULIIDAE; TRICHOPTERA;

EID: 10944231486     PISSN: 15351459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rra.833     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Baras E, Nindaba J. 1999a. Seasonal and diel utilisation of inshore microhabitats by larvae and juveniles of Leuciscus cephalus and Leuciscus leuciscus. Environmental Biology of Fishes 56: 183-197.
2. Baras E, Nindaba J. 1999b. Diel dynamics of habitat use by riverine young-of-the-year Barbus barbus and Chondrostoma nasus (Cyprinidae). Archiv für Hydrobiologie 146: 431-448.
3. Bischoff AB, Scholten M. 1996. Diurnal distribution patterns of 0+ barbel Barbus barbus (L.) in two different types of habitats in the River Sieg, Germany. Folia Zoologica 45(Suppl. 1): 13-20.
4. Copp GH. 1992. An empirical model for predicting the microhabitat of 0+ juveniles in lowland streams. Oecologia 91: 338-345.
5. Copp GH, Bennetts A. 1996. Short-term effects of removing riparian and instream cover on barbel (Barbus barbus) and other fish populations in stretch of English chalk stream. Folia Zoologica 45: 283-288.
6. Copp GH, Garner P. 1995. Evaluating microhabitat use of fish larvae and juveniles with Point Abundance Sampling. Folia Zoologica 44: 145-158.
7. Copp GH, Jurajda P. 1993. Do small riverine fish move inshore at night? Journal of Fish Biology 43(Suppl. A): 229-241.
8. Copp GH, Jurajda P. 1999. Size-structure diel use of river banks by fish. Aquatic Science 61: 75-91.
9. Copp GH, Doherty S, Faulkner H, Watkins MS, Majecki J. 2002. Diel drift behaviour of fish eggs and larvae, in particular barbel, Barbus barbus (L.), in an English chalk stream. Fisheries Management and Ecology 9: 95-104.
10. Culp JM, Scrimgeour GJ. 1993. Size-dependent diel foraging periodicity of a mayfly grazer in streams with and without fish. Oikos 68 242-250.
11. Culp JM, Glozier NE, Scrimgeour GJ. 1991. Reduction of predation risk under the cover of darkness: avoidance responses of mayfly larvae to a benthic fish. Oecologia 86: 163-169.
12. Dauble DD, Gray RH. 1980. Comparison of a small seine and a backpack electroshocker to evaluate nearshore fish populations in rivers. Progress in Fish Culture 42: 93-95.
13. Dodson S. 1990. Predicting diel vertical migration of zooplankton. Limnology and Oceanography 35: 1195-1200.
14. Elliot JM. 1977. Some methods for the statistical analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates. Freshwater Biological Assessment, Special Publication 25.
15. Faulkner H, Copp GH. 2001. A model for accurate drift estimation in streams. Freshwater Biology 46: 723-733.
16. Gadomski DM, Barfoot CA. 1998. Diel and distributional abundance patterns of fish embryos and larvae in the lower Columbia and Deschutes rivers. Environmental Biology of Fishes 51: 353-368.
17. Garner P. 1996. Diel patterns in the feeding and habitat use of 0-group fishes in a regulated river: the River Great Ouse, England. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 5: 175-182.
18. Garner P, Clough S, Griffiths SW, Deans D, Ibbostson A. 1998. Use of shallow marginal habitat by Phoxinus phoxinus: a trade-off between temperature and food. Journal of Fish Biology 52: 600-609.
19. Gaudreau N, Boisclair D. 2000. Influence of moon phase on acoustic estimates of the abundance of fish performing daily horizontal migration in a small oligotrophic lake. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 57: 581-590.
20. Gliwicz ZM. 1986. A lunar cycle in zooplankton. Ecology 64: 883-897.
21. Green RH. 1966. Measurement of non-randomness in spatial distributions. Research in Population Ecology 8: 1-7.
22. Hohausová E, Copp GH, Jankovsky P. 2003. Movement of fish between a river and its backwater: diel activity and relation to environmental gradients. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 12: 107-117.
23. Hynes HBN. 1950. The food of freshwater sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus and Pygosteus pungitius), with a review of methods used in studies of the food of fishes. Journal of Animal Ecology 19: 36-58.
24. Jacobs J. 1974. Quantitative measurement of food selection. Oecologia 14: 413-417.
25. Johnson CL, Covich AP. 2000. The importance of night-time observations for determining habitat preferences of stream biota. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 16: 91-99.
26. Kovalak WP. 1976. Seasonal and diel changes in the positioning of Glossosoma nigrior Banks (Trichoptera: Glossosamatidae) on artificial substrates. Canadian Journal of Zoology 54: 1585-1594.
27. Lammens EHRR, Hoogenboezem W. 1991. Diets and feeding behaviour. In Cyprinid Fishes: Systematics, Biology and Exploitation, Winfield IJ, Nelson JS (eds). Fish and Fisheries (Series 3). Chapman and Hall: London; 353-376.
28. MacIntosh AR, Peckarsky BL. 1996. Differential behavioural responses of mayflies from streams with and without fish to trout odour. Freshwater Biology 36: 141-148.
29. MacIntosh AR, Townsend CR. 1994. Interpopulation variation in mayfly antipredator tactics: differential effects of contrasting predatory fish. Ecology 75: 2078-2090.
30. Mathews CP. 1971. Contribution of young fish to total production of fish in the River Thames near Reading. Journal of Fish Biology 3: 157-180.
31. Mehner T, Heerkloss R. 1994. Direct estimation of food consumption of juvenile fish in a shallow inlet of the Southern Baltic. Internationale Revue für Gesanten Hydrobiologie 79: 295-304.
32. Pierce CL, Hinrichs BD. 1997. Response of littoral invertebrates to reduction of fish density: simultaneous experiments in ponds with different fish assemblages. Freshwater Biology 37: 397-408.
33. Pilcher MW, Copp GH. 1997. Winter distribution and habitat use in a regulated river system of South-East England. Fisheries Management and Ecology 4: 199-215.
34. Pitcher TJ, Parrish JK. 1993. Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts. In Behaviour of Teleost Fishes, Pitcher TJ (ed.). Chapman and Hall: London; 363-439.
35. Pitcher TJ, Magurran AE, Winfield IJ. 1982. Fish in large shoals find food faster. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 10: 149-151.
36. Przybylski M. 1996. The diel feeding pattern of bitterling, Rhodeus sericeus amarus (Bloch) in the Wieprz-Krzna Canal Poland. Polskie Archiwum Hydrobiologii 43: 203-212.
37. Reckendorfer W, Keckeis H, Winkler G, Schiemer F. 1996. Chondrostoma nasus as an indicator or river functioning: field and experimental studies at the University of Vienna. 2) Food availability for 0+ fish in the Danube: spatial and seasonal changes in plankton, benthos and drift. In Abstracts of the 2nd International Symposium on the Biology of the Genus, Freyhof J, Bischoff A (eds). Chondrostoma Agassiz, 1835, Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn; 25.
38. Rodríguez M, Magnan P. 1995. Application of multivariate analyses in studies of the organisation and structure of fish and invertebrate communities. Aquatic Science 57: 199-216.
39. Schröder T. 1979. Aspecte der Ökologie von Frühentwicklungsstadien einiger Fischarten in Altrhein und Labor. Diplomarbeit, Senckenberg-Museum Ichthyologische, Sektion II.
40. Scrimgeour GJ, Culp JM. 1994. Foraging and evading predators-the effect of predator species on a behavioural trade-off by a lotic mayfly. Oikos 69: 71-79.
41. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1981. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research (2nd edn). W.H. Freeman: San Francisco.
42. Specziár A. 2002. In situ estimates of gut evacuation and its dependence on temperature in five cyprinids. Journal of Fish Biology 60: 1222-1236.
43. Steinmetz B, Müller R. 1991. An Atlas of Fish Scales: Non-salmonid Species Found in European Fresh Waters. Samara Publishing: London.
44. Watkins MS, Doherty S, Copp GH. 1997. Microhabitat use by 0+ and older fishes in a small English chalk stream. Journal of Fish Biology 50: 1010-1024.
45. Welton JS, Mills CA, Rendle EL. 1983. Food and habitat partitioning in two small benthic fishes, Noemacheilus barbatulus (L.) and Cottus gobio L. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 97: 434-454.
46. Winfield IJ, Townsend CR. 1991. The role of cyprinids in ecosystems. In Cyprinid Fishes: Systematics, Biology and Exploitation, Winfield IJ, Nelson JS (eds). Chapman and Hall: London; 552-567.
47. Zaret TM, Rand AS. 1971. Competition in tropical stream fishes: support for the competitive exclusion principle. Ecology 52: 336-342.