Fetal and neonatal responses following maternal exposure to mobile phones

Saudi Medical Journal

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 218-223

  Rezk, Ahmed Y ^a   Abdulqawi, Khaled ^a   Mustafa, Randa M ^a   Abo El Azm, Tark M ^a   Al Inany, Hesham ^b  

^a ZAGAZIG UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^b CAIRO UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; EGYPT; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FEMALE; FETUS OUTCOME; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEALTH HAZARD; HEART OUTPUT; HEART RATE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; INFANT; MALE; MOBILE PHONE; NEWBORN; NEWBORN CARE; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRENATAL EXPOSURE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CELLULAR PHONE; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EGYPT; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEART RATE; HEART RATE, FETAL; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MATERNAL EXPOSURE; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; STROKE VOLUME;

EID: 40749152329     PISSN: 03795284     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Moulder JE, Erdreich LS, Malyapa RS, Merritt J, Pickard WF, Vijayalaxmi. Cell phones and cancer: What is the evidence for a connection? Radiat Res 1999; 151: 513-531.
2. Moustafa YM, Moustafa RM, Belacy A, Abou-El-Ela SH, Ali FM. Effects of acute exposure to the radiofrequency fields of cellular phone on plasma lipid peroxide and antioxidase activities in human erythrocytes. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2001; 605-608.
3. French PW, Penny R, Laurence JA, McKenzie DR. Mobile phones, heat shock proteins and cancer. Differentiation 2001; 67: 93-97.
4. Knave B. Electromagnetic fields and health outcomes. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2001; 30: 489-493.
5. Veterány L, Veterányová A, Jedlicka J. [Effect of magnetic field on embryonic mortality]. Cesk Pysiol 2001; 50: 141-143. Slovak
6. Divon MY, Torres FP, Yeh SY, Paul R. Autocorrelation techniques in fetal monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 2-6.
7. Celik O, Hascalik S. Effect of electromagnetic field emitted by cellular phones on fetal heart rate patterns. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 112: 55-56.
8. Henry WL, DeMaria A, Gramiak R, King DL, Kisslo JA, Popp RL, et al. Report of the American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Nomenclature and Standards in Two-dimensional Echocardiography. Circulation 1980; 62: 212-217.
9. Hossmann KA, Hermann DM. Effects of electromagnetic radiation of mobile phones on the central nervous system. Bioelectromagnetics 2003; 24: 49-62.
10. Tahvanainen K, Niño J, Halonen P, Kuusela T, Laitinen T, Länsimies E, et al. Cellular phone use does not acutely affect blood pressure or heart rate of humans. Bioelectromagneic 2004; 25: 73-83.
11. Croft RJ, Chandler JS, Burgess AP, Barry RJ, Williams JD, Clarke AR. Acute mobile phone operation affects neural function in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 113: 1623-1632.
12. Preece AW, Iwi G, Davies-Smith A, Wesnes K, Butler S, Lim E, et al. Effect of a 915-MHz simulated mobile phone signal on cognitive function in man. Int J Radiat Biol 1999; 75: 447-456.
13. Hietanen M, Kovala T, Hämäläinen AM. Human brain activity during exposure to radiofrequency fields emitted by cellular phones. Scand J Work Environ Health 2000; 26: 87-92.
14. Borbély AA, Huber R, Graf T, Fuchs B, Gallmann E, Achermann P. Pulsed high-frequency electromagnetic field affects human sleep and sleep electroencephalogram. Neurosci Lett 1999; 275: 207-210.
15. Sandström M, Wilen J, Oftedal G, Hansson Mild K. Mobile phone use and subjective symptoms. Comparison of symptoms experienced by users of analogue and digital mobile phones. Occup Med (Lond) 2001; 51: 25-35.
16. Muscat JE, Malkin MG, Thompson S, Shore RE, Stellman SD, McRee D, et al. Handheld cellular telephone use and risk of brain cancer. JAMA 2000; 284: 3001-3007.
17. Braune S, Wrocklage C, Raczek J, Gailus T, Lücking CH. Resting blood pressure increase during exposure to a radiofrequency electromagnetic field. Lancet 1998; 351: 1857-1858.
18. Santini R, Seigne M, Bonhomme-Faivre L, Bouffet S, Defrasne E, Sage M. [Symptoms reported by mobile cellular telephone users]. Pathol Biol 2001; 49: 222-226. French
19. Vadeyar SH, Moore RJ, Strachan BK, Gowland PA, Shakespeare SA, James DK, et al. Effect of fetal magnetic resonance imaging on fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 666-669.
20. Ali FM, S Mohamed W, Mohamed MR. Effect of 50 Hz, 0.2 mT magnetic fields on RBC properties and heart functions of albino rats. Bioelectromagnetics 2003; 24: 535-545.
21. Cho MR, Thatte HS, Silvia MT, Golan DE. Transmembrane calcium influx induced by ac electric fields. FASEB J 1999; 13: 677-683.
22. Fanelli C, Coppola S, Barone R, Colussi C, Gualandi G, Volpe P, et al. Magnetic fields increase cell survival by inhibiting apoptosis via modulation of Ca2+ influx. FASEB J 1999; 13: 95-102.
23. Pessina GP, Aldinucci C, Palmi M, Sgaragli G, Benocci A, Meini A, et al. Pulsed electromagnetic fields affect the intracellular calcium concentrations in human astrocytoma cells. Bioelectromagnetics 2001; 22: 503-510.
24. Grassi C, D'Ascenzo M, Torsello A, Martinotti G, Wolf F, Cittadini A, et al. Effects of 50 Hz electromagnetic fields on voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and their role in modulation of neuroendocrine cell proliferation and death. Cell Calcium 2004; 35: 307-315.
25. Arutiunian LL, Danielian AA, Grigorian GE, Airepetian SN. [Sensitivity of different tissues of rats to the effect of a permanent magnetic field]. Radiats Biol Radioecol 1998; 38: 913-915. Russian
26. Tofani S, Barone D, Cintorino M, de Santi MM, Ferrara A, Orlassino R, et al. Static and ELF magnetic fields induce tumor growth inhibition and apoptosis. Bioelectromagnetics 2001; 22: 419-428.
27. Veliks V, Ceihnere E, Svikis I, Aivars J. Static magnetic field influence on rat brain function detected by heart rate monitoring. Bioelectromagnetics 2004; 25: 211-215.