SCOPUS 정보 검색 플랫폼

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 111, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 423-426

Making sense of odds and odds ratios

(2) Grimes, David A a Schulz, Kenneth F a

a FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK; RISK FACTOR; ARTICLE; INCIDENCE; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; ODDS RATIO; PROBABILITY; RISK;

EID: 40749141661 PISSN: 00297844 EISSN: 1873233X Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000297304.32187.5d Document Type: Editorial

Times cited : (134)

References (16)

1
- 85007745189
- Statistics notes. The odds ratio.
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes. The odds ratio. BMJ 2000;320:1468.
- (2000) BMJ , vol.320 , pp. 1468
- Bland, J.M.¹ Altman, D.G.²

2
- 0034802428
- An odd measure of risk: use and misuse of the odds ratio.
- Holcomb WL Jr, Chaiworapongsa T, Luke DA, Burgdorf KD. An odd measure of risk: use and misuse of the odds ratio. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:685-8.
- (2001) Obstet Gynecol , vol.98 , pp. 685-8
- Holcomb, W.L.¹ Chaiworapongsa, T.² Luke, D.A.³ Burgdorf, K.D.⁴

3
- 0029962305
- The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization.
- Peterson HB, Xia Z, Hughes JM, Wilcox LS, Tylor LR, Trussell J. The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1161-8.
- (1996) Am J Obstet Gynecol , vol.174 , pp. 1161-8
- Peterson, H.B.¹ Xia, Z.² Hughes, J.M.³ Wilcox, L.S.⁴ Tylor, L.R.⁵ Trussell, J.⁶

4
- 35348840319
- 200% of nothing: an eye-opening tour through the twists and turns of math abuse and innumeracy.
- New York (NY), John Wiley & Sons
- Dewdney AK. 200% of nothing: an eye-opening tour through the twists and turns of math abuse and innumeracy. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1993.
- (1993)
- Dewdney, A.K.¹

5
- 0033595085
- Misunderstandings about the effects of race and sex on physicians’ referrals for cardiac catheterization.
- Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG. Misunderstandings about the effects of race and sex on physicians’ referrals for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med 1999;341:279-83.
- (1999) N Engl J Med , vol.341 , pp. 279-83
- Schwartz, L.M.¹ Woloshin, S.² Welch, H.G.³

6
- 33745288599
- The (relative) risks of using odds ratios.
- Katz KA. The (relative) risks of using odds ratios. Arch Dermatol 2006;142:761-4.
- (2006) Arch Dermatol , vol.142 , pp. 761-4
- Katz, K.A.¹

7
- 0001945410
- Down with odds ratios!
- Sackett DL, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Down with odds ratios! Evidence Based Med 1996;1:164-6.
- (1996) Evidence Based Med , vol.1 , pp. 164-6
- Sackett, D.L.¹ Deeks, J.J.² Altman, D.G.³

8
- 0032574489
- When can odds ratios mislead?
- Davies HT, Crombie IK, Tavakoli M. When can odds ratios mislead? BMJ 1998;316:989-91.
- (1998) BMJ , vol.316 , pp. 989-91
- Davies, H.T.¹ Crombie, I.K.² Tavakoli, M.³

9
- 0036740882
- Odds ratio, relative risk, absolute risk reduction, and the number needed to treat: which of these should we use?
- Schechtman E. Odds ratio, relative risk, absolute risk reduction, and the number needed to treat: which of these should we use? Value Health 2002;5:431-6.
- (2002) Value Health , vol.5 , pp. 431-6
- Schechtman, E.¹

10
- 0029619475
- Low-dose versus high-dose oxytocin augmentation of labor: a randomized trial.
- Xenakis EM, Langer O, Piper JM, Conway D, Berkus MD. Low-dose versus high-dose oxytocin augmentation of labor: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:1874-8.
- (1995) Am J Obstet Gynecol , vol.173 , pp. 1874-8
- Xenakis, E.M.¹ Langer, O.² Piper, J.M.³ Conway, D.⁴ Berkus, M.D.⁵

11
- 0037006383
- Case-control studies: research in reverse.
- Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Case-control studies: research in reverse. Lancet 2002;359:431-4.
- (2002) Lancet , vol.359 , pp. 431-4
- Schulz, K.F.¹ Grimes, D.A.²

12
- 0036896766
- Advanced statistics: up with odds ratios! A case for odds ratios when outcomes are common.
- Cook TD. Advanced statistics: up with odds ratios! A case for odds ratios when outcomes are common. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:1430-4.
- (2002) Acad Emerg Med , vol.9 , pp. 1430-4
- Cook, T.D.¹

13
- 0026532259
- Progestins, breast cancer, and the limitations of epidemiology.
- Grimes DA. Progestins, breast cancer, and the limitations of epidemiology. Fertil Steril 1992;57:492-4.
- (1992) Fertil Steril , vol.57 , pp. 492-4
- Grimes, D.A.¹

14
- 0037132876
- Bias and causal associations in observational research.
- Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Bias and causal associations in observational research. Lancet 2002;359:248-52.
- (2002) Lancet , vol.359 , pp. 248-52
- Grimes, D.A.¹ Schulz, K.F.²

15
- 0032544993
- What’s the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes.
- Zhang J, Yu KF. What’s the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA 1998;280:1690-1.
- (1998) JAMA , vol.280 , pp. 1690-1
- Zhang, J.¹ Yu, K.F.²

16
- 0026463171
- The case for confidence intervals.
- Grimes DA. The case for confidence intervals. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:865-6.
- (1992) Obstet Gynecol , vol.80 , pp. 865-6
- Grimes, D.A.¹

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.