메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 33-34

Student ratings of teaching: Myths, facts, and good practices

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 40749111479     PISSN: 00092479     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Short Survey
Times cited : (5)

References (11)
  • 1
    • 0002962327 scopus 로고
    • What Do They Know, Anyway?
    • Felder, R.M., "What Do They Know, Anyway?" Chem. Eng. Ed., 26(3), 134-135 (1992), 〈http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/ Columns/Eval.html〉
    • (1992) Chem. Eng. Ed , vol.26 , Issue.3 , pp. 134-135
    • Felder, R.M.1
  • 2
    • 0003498550 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • IDEA Paper No. 22, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, Kansas State University, January 1990
    • (a) Cashin, W.E., "Student Ratings of Teaching: Recommendations for Use," IDEA Paper No. 22, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, Kansas State University, January 1990, 〈http://www.idea.ksu.edu/papers/ Idea_Paper_22.pdf〉;
    • Student Ratings of Teaching: Recommendations for Use
    • Cashin, W.E.1
  • 3
    • 33645241668 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Faculty Thoughts and Concerns About Student Ratings
    • Fall
    • (b) Ory, J.C., "Faculty Thoughts and Concerns About Student Ratings," New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 87, 3-15 (Fall 2001);
    • (2001) New Directions for Teaching and Learning , vol.87 , pp. 3-15
    • Ory, J.C.1
  • 4
    • 0001380167 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Student Ratings: Their Validity of Use
    • (c) McKeachie, W.J., "Student Ratings: Their Validity of Use," American Psychologist, 52(11), 1218-1225 (1997);
    • (1997) American Psychologist , vol.52 , Issue.11 , pp. 1218-1225
    • McKeachie, W.J.1
  • 5
    • 0004201028 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 11th Ed, Boston, Houghton Mifflin Co
    • (d) McKeachie, W.J., Teaching Tips, 11th Ed., Boston, Houghton Mifflin Co., 326-328 (2002)
    • (2002) Teaching Tips , pp. 326-328
    • McKeachie, W.J.1
  • 6
    • 34247185447 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Student Perceptions of High Course Workloads Are Not Associated With Poor Student Evaluations of Instructor Performance
    • Dee, K.C., "Student Perceptions of High Course Workloads Are Not Associated With Poor Student Evaluations of Instructor Performance," J. Eng. Ed., 96(1), 69-78 (2007)
    • (2007) J. Eng. Ed , vol.96 , Issue.1 , pp. 69-78
    • Dee, K.C.1
  • 7
    • 0031267172 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Grading Leniency is a Removable Contaminant of Student Ratings
    • Greenwald, A.G., and G.M. Gillmore, "Grading Leniency is a Removable Contaminant of Student Ratings," American Psychologist, 52(11), 1209-1217 (1997)
    • (1997) American Psychologist , vol.52 , Issue.11 , pp. 1209-1217
    • Greenwald, A.G.1    Gillmore, G.M.2
  • 8
    • 0002844667 scopus 로고
    • Do Teacher Standards for Assigning Grades Affect Student Evaluations of Instruction?
    • Abrami, P.C., W.J. Dickens, R.P. Perry, and L. Leventhal, "Do Teacher Standards for Assigning Grades Affect Student Evaluations of Instruction?" J. Educational Psychology, 72, 107-118 (1980)
    • (1980) J. Educational Psychology , vol.72 , pp. 107-118
    • Abrami, P.C.1    Dickens, W.J.2    Perry, R.P.3    Leventhal, L.4
  • 9
    • 4043076890 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to Evaluate Teaching
    • Felder, R.M., and R. Brent, "How to Evaluate Teaching," Chem. Eng. Ed., 38(3), 200-202 (2004), 〈http://www.ncsu.edu/ felder/public/Columns/Teacheval.pdf〉.
    • (2004) Chem. Eng. Ed , vol.38 , Issue.3 , pp. 200-202
    • Felder, R.M.1    Brent, R.2
  • 10
    • 40749162568 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Protocol for Peer Review of Teaching
    • See also A, Peer-Review.pdf〉
    • See also "A Protocol for Peer Review of Teaching," (〈http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Papers/ASEE04(Peer-Review).pdf〉)


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.