-
1
-
-
0002962327
-
What Do They Know, Anyway?
-
Felder, R.M., "What Do They Know, Anyway?" Chem. Eng. Ed., 26(3), 134-135 (1992), 〈http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/ Columns/Eval.html〉
-
(1992)
Chem. Eng. Ed
, vol.26
, Issue.3
, pp. 134-135
-
-
Felder, R.M.1
-
2
-
-
0003498550
-
-
IDEA Paper No. 22, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, Kansas State University, January 1990
-
(a) Cashin, W.E., "Student Ratings of Teaching: Recommendations for Use," IDEA Paper No. 22, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, Kansas State University, January 1990, 〈http://www.idea.ksu.edu/papers/ Idea_Paper_22.pdf〉;
-
Student Ratings of Teaching: Recommendations for Use
-
-
Cashin, W.E.1
-
3
-
-
33645241668
-
Faculty Thoughts and Concerns About Student Ratings
-
Fall
-
(b) Ory, J.C., "Faculty Thoughts and Concerns About Student Ratings," New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 87, 3-15 (Fall 2001);
-
(2001)
New Directions for Teaching and Learning
, vol.87
, pp. 3-15
-
-
Ory, J.C.1
-
4
-
-
0001380167
-
Student Ratings: Their Validity of Use
-
(c) McKeachie, W.J., "Student Ratings: Their Validity of Use," American Psychologist, 52(11), 1218-1225 (1997);
-
(1997)
American Psychologist
, vol.52
, Issue.11
, pp. 1218-1225
-
-
McKeachie, W.J.1
-
5
-
-
0004201028
-
-
11th Ed, Boston, Houghton Mifflin Co
-
(d) McKeachie, W.J., Teaching Tips, 11th Ed., Boston, Houghton Mifflin Co., 326-328 (2002)
-
(2002)
Teaching Tips
, pp. 326-328
-
-
McKeachie, W.J.1
-
6
-
-
34247185447
-
Student Perceptions of High Course Workloads Are Not Associated With Poor Student Evaluations of Instructor Performance
-
Dee, K.C., "Student Perceptions of High Course Workloads Are Not Associated With Poor Student Evaluations of Instructor Performance," J. Eng. Ed., 96(1), 69-78 (2007)
-
(2007)
J. Eng. Ed
, vol.96
, Issue.1
, pp. 69-78
-
-
Dee, K.C.1
-
7
-
-
0031267172
-
Grading Leniency is a Removable Contaminant of Student Ratings
-
Greenwald, A.G., and G.M. Gillmore, "Grading Leniency is a Removable Contaminant of Student Ratings," American Psychologist, 52(11), 1209-1217 (1997)
-
(1997)
American Psychologist
, vol.52
, Issue.11
, pp. 1209-1217
-
-
Greenwald, A.G.1
Gillmore, G.M.2
-
8
-
-
0002844667
-
Do Teacher Standards for Assigning Grades Affect Student Evaluations of Instruction?
-
Abrami, P.C., W.J. Dickens, R.P. Perry, and L. Leventhal, "Do Teacher Standards for Assigning Grades Affect Student Evaluations of Instruction?" J. Educational Psychology, 72, 107-118 (1980)
-
(1980)
J. Educational Psychology
, vol.72
, pp. 107-118
-
-
Abrami, P.C.1
Dickens, W.J.2
Perry, R.P.3
Leventhal, L.4
-
9
-
-
4043076890
-
How to Evaluate Teaching
-
Felder, R.M., and R. Brent, "How to Evaluate Teaching," Chem. Eng. Ed., 38(3), 200-202 (2004), 〈http://www.ncsu.edu/ felder/public/Columns/Teacheval.pdf〉.
-
(2004)
Chem. Eng. Ed
, vol.38
, Issue.3
, pp. 200-202
-
-
Felder, R.M.1
Brent, R.2
-
10
-
-
40749162568
-
Protocol for Peer Review of Teaching
-
See also A, Peer-Review.pdf〉
-
See also "A Protocol for Peer Review of Teaching," (〈http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Papers/ASEE04(Peer-Review).pdf〉)
-
-
-
|