Governance of material transfer agreements

Technology in Society

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 122-128

  Rodriguez, Victor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Academic freedom; European Union; Material transfer agreement

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; MATERIALS HANDLING;

METERIAL TRANSFER AGREEMENTS;

MATERIALS SCIENCE;

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; EUROPEAN UNION; RESEARCH PROGRAM;

EID: 40649122965     PISSN: 0160791X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Heller M., and Eisenberg R. Can patents deter innovation. The anticommons in biomedical research. Science 280 (1998) 698-701
2. Mirowski P., and Van Horn R. The contract research organization and the commercialization of scientific research. Soc Stud Sci 35 (2005) 503-548
3. Eisenberg R. Bargaining over the transfer of proprietary research tools. In: Dreyfuss R., Zimmerman D., and First H. (Eds). Expanding the boundaries of intellectual property (2001), Oxford University Press, New York
4. Rodriguez V, Debackere K. Strategies for satisfying the need for research materials. Les Nouvelles 2007; September:529-33.
5. National Academies. Reaping the benefits of genomic and proteomic research: intellectual property rights, innovation, and public health (2005), National Academies Press, Washington, DC
6. Walsh J., Arora A., and Cohen W. Research tool patenting and licensing and biomedical innovation. In: Cohen W., and Merrill S. (Eds). Patents in the knowledge-based economy (2003), National Academies Press, Washington, DC
7. Campbell E., Clarridge B., Gokhale M., Birenbaum L., Hilgartner S., Holtzman N., et al. Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey. J Am Med Assoc 287 (2002) 473-480
8. Walsh J., Cho C., and Cohen W. Patents, material transfers, and access to research inputs in biomedical research. Final report to the national academy of sciences' committee intellectual property rights in genomic and protein-related inventions (2005), University of Illinois, Chicago
9. Rodriguez V., Janssens F., Debackere K., and De Moor B. Do material transfer agreements affect the choice of research agendas? The case of biotechnology in Belgium. Scientometrics 71 (2007) 239-269
10. Posner R. The law and economics of intellectual property. Daedalus 7 (2002) 5-12 (Spring.)
11. Marshall E. Need a reagent just sign here. Science 278 (1997) 212-213
12. Commission of the European Communities. The implementation by the EC of the "Bonn Guidelines" on access to genetic resources and benefit-sharing under the convention on biological diversity, communication vol. 821 (2003), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
13. Commission of the European Communities. Proposal for a council decision concerning the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the international treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, Communication vol. 602 (2003), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
14. Commission of the European Communities. Proposal for a council decision on the signature, on behalf of the European Community, of the international treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, communication vol. 197 (2002), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
15. Malahide Conference. Working Groups' comments and conclusions. Halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010: priorities, targets and opportunities. In: Conference on biodiversity and sustaining life, sustaining livelihoods, European Commission, Malahide, 2004.
16. Commission of the European Communities. Plant genetic resources: great success in an important step towards an accord on access to agricultural seeds and the sharing of commercial benefits. Agriculture news digest, 2004. p. 103. Available at: 〈http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/newsdigest/2004/103.htm#book1〉.
17. De Brabandere J., and Desmeth P. MOSAICC: elaboration and diffusion of a "code of conduct" for the access and sustainable use of microbial resources within the framework of the convention of biodiversity. In: Caro S. (Ed). Ethical, legal and socio-economic aspects of agriculture, fisheries and food biotechnology: an overview of research activities 1994-2002 (2002), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
18. MacDonald L., Capart G., Bohlander B., Cordonnier M., Jonsson L., Kaiser L., et al. Management of intellectual property in publicly funded research organisations: toward European guidelines (2004), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
19. Murray F, Stern S. When ideas are not free: the impact of patents on scientific research. Unpublished Manuscript, 2006.
20. National Institutes of Health. Principles and guidelines for recipients of NIH research grants and contracts on obtaining and disseminating biomedical research resources. Final notice. Fed Regist 64 (1999) 72090-72096
21. National Institutes of Health. Best practices for the licensing of genomic inventions. Final notice. Fed Regist 70 (2005) 18413-18415
22. Freire M. Ethical aspects of patenting inventions involving human stem cells. In: Nielsen L., and Whittaker P. (Eds). Opinion of the European group on ethics in science and new technologies to the European Commission vol. 16 (2002), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
23. Commission of the European Communities. Life sciences and biotechnology: a strategy for Europe, communication vol. 27 (2002), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg