Views on data use, confidentiality and consent in a predictive screening involving children

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 206-209

  Helgesson, Gert ^a,c   Swartling, U ^b  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CONFIDENTIALITY; ETHICS; FAMILY; HUMAN; INFANT; INFORMED CONSENT; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MASS SCREENING; NEWBORN; PRESCHOOL CHILD; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SWEDEN;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CONFIDENTIALITY; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DISCLOSURE; FAMILY; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFORMED CONSENT; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MASS SCREENING; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; SWEDEN;

EID: 40649121563     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2006.020016     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. In: Doyal L, Tobias J, eds. Informed consent in medical research. London: BMJ Books, 2000.
2. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
3. Shalala D. Protecting research subjects - what must be done. New Engl J Med 2000;343:808.
4. Roberts MJ, Reich MR. Ethical analysis in public health. Lancet 2002;359:1055-9.
5. Miller F. Does research ethics rest on a mistake? Am J Bioethics 2005;5:34-6.
6. Kelch R. Maintaining the public trust in clinical research. New Engl J Med 2002;346:285.
7. Roth R. Psychological and ethical aspects of prevention trials. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2001;14(S1):669-74.
8. Kuczewski MG, Marshall P. The decision dynamics of clinical research: the context and process of informed consent. Med Care 2002;40(S):45-54.
9. Beskow LM, Burke W, Merz JF, et al. Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics. JAMA 2001; 286:2315-21.
10. Knoppers B, Avard D, Cardinal G, et al. Children and incompetent adults in genetic research: consent and safeguards. Nature Reviews 2002;3:221-4.
11. Helgesson G. Children, longitudinal studies, and informed consent. Med Health Care Philos 2005;8:307-3.
12. Rose AL, Peters N, Shea JA, et al. Attitudes and misconceptions about predictive genetic testing for cancer risk. Community Genet 2005;8:145-51.
13. Sepa A, Frodi A, Ludvigsson J. Mothers' experiences of serious life events increase the risk of diabetes-related autoimmunity in their children. Diabetes Care 2005;10:2394-9.
14. Gustafsson Stolt U, Ludvigsson J, Liss P-E, Svensson T. Bioethical theory and practice in genetic screening for Type 1 diabetes. Med Health Care Philos 2003;6:45-50.
15. Swartling U, Eriksson S, Ludvigsson J, et al. Concern, pressure and lack of knowledge affect choice of not wanting to know high-risk status, Eur J Hum Genet, 2007;15:556-62.
16. Kettis-Lindblad A, Ring L, Viberth E, et al. Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think? Eur J Public Health 2006;16:433-40.
17. Hoeyer K. 'Science is really needed - that's all I know': informed consent and the non-verbal practices of collecting blood for genetic research in northern Sweden. New Genet Soc 2003;22:229-44.
18. Hoeyer K, Lynoe N. Motivating donors to genetic research? Anthropological reasons to rethink the role of informed consent. Med Health Care Philos 2006;9:13-23.
19. Richards MPM, Ponder M, Pharoah P, et al. Issues of consent and feedback in a genetic epidemiological study of women with breast cancer. J Med Ethics 2003;29:93-6.
20. Eriksson S. Should results from genetic research be returned to research subjects and their biological relatives? Trames 2004; 8:46-62.
21. German National Ethics Council (Nationaler Ethikrat). Biobanks for research. Opinion. Berlin, 2004.
22. Laurie G. Genetic privacy. A challenge to medico-legal norms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
23. Rhodes R. Why test children for adult-onset genetic diseases? Mt Sinai J Med 2006;73:609-16.
24. Rhodes R. Genetic links, family ties, and social bonds: rights and responsibilities in the face of genetic knowledge, J Med Philos 1998;23:10-30.
25. Peel E, Parry O, Douglas M, et al. 'It's no skin off my nose': Why people take part in qualitative research. Qual Health Res 2006;16:1335-49.
26. Hoehn KS, Wernovsky G, Rychik J, et al. What factors are important to parents making decisions about neonatal research? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005;90:F267-9.
27. Rodriguez A, Tuvemo T, Hansson MG. Parents' perspectives on research involving children. Ups J Med Sci 2006;111:73-86.
28. Golding J, The ALSPAC Study Team. The Avon longitudinal study of parents and children (ALSPAC) - study design and collaborative opportunities. Eur J Endocrinol 2004;151:U119-23.
29. Golding J, Pembrey M, Jones R, the ALSPAC Study Team. ALSPAC - The Avon longitudinal study of parents and children I. Study methodology. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2001;15:74-87.
30. Haimes E, Whong-Barr M. Levels and styles of participation in genetic databases. A case study of the North Cumbria Community Genetics Project. In Tutton R, Corrigan O (eds.). Genetic databases: Socio-ethical issues in the collection and use of DNA. London: Routledge, 2004:57-77.
31. Haimes E, Whong-Barr M, Key issues in genetic epidemiology: lessons from a UK based empirical study. Trames 2004; 8:150-63.
32. Chase D, Tawn E, Parker L, et al. The North Cumbria community genetics project. J Med Genet 1998;35:413-6.
33. Williamson E, Goodenough T, Kent J, et al. Children's participation in genetic epidemiology, In: Tutton R, Corrigan O, eds. Genetic databases: Socio-ethical issues in the collection and use of DNA. London: Routledge, 2004:139-60.
34. Goodenough T, Williamson E, Kent J, Ashcroft R. "What Did You Think about That?" Researching children's perceptions of participation in a longitudinal genetic epidemiological study', Children & Society 2003;17:113-25.
35. Alderson P, Montgomery J. Health Care Choices. Making Decisions with Children. London: IPPR, 1996.