Human resources for science and technology: Analyzing competitiveness using the analytic hierarchy process

Technology in Society

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 141-153

  Chou, Ying Chyi ^a   Hsu, Ying Ying ^b   Yen, Hsin Yi ^c  

^a TUNGHAI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b Science and Technology Advisory Group   (Taiwan)

^c FENG CHIA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Analytical hierarchy process; Competitiveness; Human resources for science and technology (HRST); OECD

Indexed keywords

MANAGEMENT; TECHNOLOGY;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; COMPETITIVENESS; HUMAN RESOURCES FOR SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY (HRST);

PERSONNEL;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; COMPETITIVENESS; HUMAN RESOURCE; OECD; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 40649121457     PISSN: 0160791X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Saaty T.L. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48 (1990) 9-26
2. Badri M.A. Combining the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for global facility location-allocation problem. Int J Prod Econ 62 (1999) 237-248
3. Sinuany-Stern Z., Mehrez A., and Hadad Y. An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision-making units. Int Trans Oper Res 7 (2000) 109-124
4. Tiwari M.K., and Banerjee R. A decision support system for the selection of a casting process using analytic hierarchy process. Prod Plan Control 12 (2001) 689-694
5. Muralidharan C. Application of control charts in analytic hierarchy process. Prod Plan Control 10 (1999) 200-204
6. IMD. The world competitiveness yearbook (2006), Institute of Management Development, Paris
7. Feurer R., and Chaharbaghi K. Defining competitiveness: a holistic approach. Manage Decis 32 2 (1994) 49-58
8. Roessner J.D., Porter A.L., Newman N., and Cauffiel D. Anticipating the future high-tech competitiveness of nations: indicators for twenty-eight countries. Technol Forecast Soc Change 51 (1996) 133-149
9. OECD. Frascati manual, proposed standard practice for surveys of research and experimental development (2002), OECD, Paris
10. Madanmohan T.R., Kumar U., and Kumar V. Import-led technological capability: a comparative analysis of Indian and Indonesian manufacturing firms. Technovation 24 (2004) 979-993
11. Caves R.E. Multinational enterprise and economic analysis (1982), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
12. Geisler E. An integrated cost-performance model of research and development evaluation. Omega 23 3 (1995) 281-294
13. Taylor B.W., and Davis K.D. Corporate productivity-getting it all together. Ind Eng 9 (1977) 32-36
14. Nagesh K. Determinants of location of overseas R&D activity of multinational enterprises: the case of US and Japanese corporations. Res Policy 30 (2001) 159-174
15. Pawan S. Legal measures and tax incentives for encouraging science and technology development: the examples of Japan, Korea and India. Technol Soc 20 (1998) 45-60
16. Sallehuddin I. The role of university in promoting and developing technology: a case study of Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Higher Educ Policy 10 2 (1997) 121-126
17. Oyebisi T.O., and Agboola A.A. The impact of the environment on the growth of Nigeria. Int J Inf Manage 23 (2003) 313-321