The limitations of the technology roadmap and importance of new management tools in science-based innovation: The case of nanotechnology in Japan

IEEM 2007: 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 2115-2119

  Kanama, D ^a   Kondo, A ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Complexity; Nanotechnology; Science based innovation; Technology roadmap

Indexed keywords

MARKETING; PROBLEM SOLVING; STRATEGIC PLANNING; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

SCIENCE-BASED INNOVATION; TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP;

NANOTECHNOLOGY;

EID: 40649085330     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IEEM.2007.4419565     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Goto, A. and Odagiri, H., 2003, "The Industrial Systems in Japan and New Developments: Science-Based Industries", NTT Publishing Co., Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan.
2. Goto, A. and Kodama, T., 2006, "Japan's National Innovation System: Rebuilding the Engine of Growth" (in Japanese), University of Tokyo Press: Tokyo, Japan.
3. Christensen, C. M., 1997, "The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail", Harvard Business School Pr.
4. Hippel, E. V., 2005, "Democratizing innovation", MIT Pr.
5. Stokes, D. E., 1997, "Pasteurs Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation", Brookings Inst. Pr.
6. Kondo, M., 2006, "University-Industry Partnerships in Japan. 21st Century Innovation Systems for Japan and the United States: Lessons from a Decade of Change", Tokyo, Japan.
7. Salter, A. J. and Martin, B. R., 2001, "The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review", Research Policy, 30, 509-532.
8. Mowery, D. C. and Sampat, B. N., 2005, "The Bayh-Dole act of 1980 and university-industry technology transfer: A model for other OECD governments?" The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30 (1-2), 115-127.
9. Chesbrough, H. W., 2003, "Open Innovation", Harvard Business School Corporation: Cambridge, M.A.
10. Mowery, D. C. and Sampat, B. N., 2006, "Universities in national innovation systems", The Oxford handbook of innovation, pp.209-239. Oxford Univ. Pr.
11. Mowery, D. C. and Ziedonis, A. A., 2002, "Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States", Research Policy, 31, 399-418.
12. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), 2005, "the Technology RoadMap 2005", Tokyo, Japan.
13. 108th Congress on the U.S., 2003, "21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act", S189.
14. European Commission, 2004, "Towards a European Strategy for Nanotechnology"
15. European Science Foundation, 2005, "ESF Scientific Forward Look on Nanomedicine: ESF"
16. Martin, R., 2004, "Technology roadmaps: Infrastructure for innovation", Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, Vol. 71, pp.67- 80.
17. Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J. P. and Probert, D. R., 2004, "Technology roadmapping - A planning framework for evolution and revolution", Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, Vol. 71, pp.5-26.
18. Petrick, I. J. and Provance, M., 2005, "Roadmapping as a mitigator of uncertainty in strategic technology choice", Int. J. Technology Intelligence and Planning, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp.171-184.
19. Ma, T., Liu, S. and Nakamori, Y., 2006, "Roadmapping as a way of knowledge management for supporting scientific research in academia", Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol.23, Issue 6, pp.743-755
20. Yasunaga, Y. and Yoon, T., 2006, "Technology Roadmap", Open Knowledge Co., Ltd: Tokyo, Japan.
21. Kanama, D. 2007, "EU Nanoroadmap: Issues and Outlook for Technological Roadmaps in the Nanotechnology Field", Science and Technology Trends. National Institute of Science and Technology Policy: Tokyo, Japan.