Individual differences and intervention flaws: A sequential explanatory study of college students' copy-and-paste note taking

Journal of Mixed Methods Research

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 149-168

  Igo, Brent L ^a   Kiewra, Kenneth A ^b   Bruning, Roger ^b  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive processes; Internet learning; Note taking; Sequential explanatory

Indexed keywords

EID: 40549133222     PISSN: 15586898     EISSN: 15586901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1558689807313161     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Anderson, T.H., & Armbruster, B.B. (1984). Studying. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 657-679). New York: Longman.
2. Benton, S.L., Glover, J.A., Monkowski, P.C., & Shaughnessy, M. (1983). Decision difficulty and recall of prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 727-742.
3. Blanchard, J.S. (1985). What to tell students about underlining... and why. Journal of Reading, 29, 199 - 203.
4. Collins, K., Onwuegbuzie, A., & Sutton, I. (2006). A model incorporating the rationale and purpose for conducting mixed methods research in special education and beyond. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4 (1), 67-100.
5. Craik, F., & Lockhart, R. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684,
6. Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2 nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Green, S.B., Salkind, N.J., & Akey, T.M. (2000). Using SPSS for Windows: Analyzing and understanding data (2 nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Greene, J.C. (2006). Toward a methodology of mixed methods social inquiry. Research in the Schools, 13 (1), 93-99.
10. Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1986). Producing written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction. Review of Educational Research, 56, 473-493.
11. Igo, L.B., Bruning, R., & McCrudden, M.T. (2005 a). Encoding disruption associated with copy and paste note taking. In L. M. Pytlik-Zillig, M. Bodvarsson, & R. Bruning (Eds.), Technology-based education: Bringing researchers and practitioners together (pp. 107-119), Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
12. Igo, L.B., Bruning, R., & McCrudden, M.T. (2005 b). Exploring differences in students' copy and paste decision-making and processing: A mixed-method study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97 (1), 103-116.
13. Igo, L.B., Bruning, R., McCrudden, M.T., & Kauffman, D.F. (2003). InfoGather: Six experiments toward the development of an online, data-gathering tool. In R. Bruning, C. A. Horn, & L. M. Pytlik-Zillig (Eds.), Web-based learning: What do we know? Where do we go? (pp. 57-77) Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
14. Igo, B., Kiewra, K., & Bruning, R. (2004, April). Further explorations in online, copy and paste note taking: Mixed methods evidence for how levels of restriction affect encoding. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
15. Igo, L.B., Riccomini, P.J., Bruning, R., & Pope G. (2006). How should middle school students with LD take Web-based notes: A mixed methods study. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29 (2), 112-121.
16. Johnson, L.L. (1988). Effects of underlining textbook sentences on passage and sentence recall. Reading Research and Instruction, 28, 18-32.
17. Katayama, A.D., Shambaugh, R.N., Edmonds, T., & Doctor, T. (2005). Promoting knowledge transfer with electronic note taking. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 129-131.
18. Marxen, D.E. (1996). Why reading and underlining a passage is a less effective strategy than simply rereading the passage. Reading Improvement, 33, 88-96.
19. Mayer, R.R. (2002). The promise of educational psychology: Volume 2. Teaching for meaningful learning. Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice Hall.
20. McAndrew, D.A. (1983). Underlining and note taking: Some suggestions from research. Journal of Reading, 27, 103-08.
21. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Peterson, S.E. (1992). The cognitive functions of underlining as a study technique. Reading Research and Instruction, 31, 49-56.
23. Rickards, J.P., & August, G.J. (1975). Generative underlining strategies in prose recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 860-865.
24. Rinehart, S.D., & Thomas, K.A. (1993). Summarization ability and text recall by novice studiers. Reading Research and Instruction, 32, 24-32.
25. Slotte, V., & Lonka, K. (1999). Review and process effects of spontaneous note taking on text comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 1 - 20.
26. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.