Global alignment of multiple protein interaction networks

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2008, PSB 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 303-314

  Singh, Rohit ^a   Xu, Jinbo ^b   Berger, Bonnie ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b TOYOTA TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EIGENVALUE PROBLEM; GLOBAL ALIGNMENT; K-PARTITE MATCHING; ORTHOLOGS; ORTHOLOGY; PROTEIN INTERACTION NETWORKS; PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTION NETWORKS; SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION;

ALGORITHMS; ALIGNMENT; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS;

PROTEINS;

CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS PROTEIN; DROSOPHILA PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOUSE; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; STATISTICS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS PROTEINS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; HUMANS; MICE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 40549129437     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. http://www.geneontology.org.
2. S. Bandyopadhyay, R. Sharan, and T. Ideker. Systematic identification of func-tional orthologs. Genome Research, 16(3):428-435, 2006.
3. B. P. Kelley et al. PathBLAST: a tool for alignment of protein interaction networks. Nucleic Acids Research, 32:W83-8, 2004.
4. C. Stark et al. BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Research, 34:D535-9, 2006.
5. D. L. Wheeler et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotech-nology Information. Nucleic acids research, 35:D5-12, 2007.
6. F. Chen et al. Assessing performance of orthology detection strategies applied to eukaryotic genomes. PLoS ONE, 2:e383, 2007.
7. G. R. Mishra et al. Human Protein Reference Database-2006 update. Nucleic Acids Research, 34:D411-4, 2006.
8. I. Xenarios et al. DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins. Nucleic Acids Research, 30(1):303-305, 2002.
9. J. Flannick et al. Graemlin: general and robust alignment of multiple large interaction networks. Genome Research, 16(9):1169-1181, 2006.
10. M. Kellis et al. Methods in comparative genomics. Journal of Computatzonal Biology, 11(2-3):319-355, 2004.
11. M. Koyuturk et al. Pairwise alignment of protein interaction networks. Journal of Computational Biology, 13(2): 182-199, 2006.
12. P. Uetz et al. From ORFeomes to protein interaction maps in viruses. Genome Research, 14(10B):2029-2033, 2004.
13. M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability. Freeman, 1979.
14. G. H. Golub and C. Van Loan. Matrix Computations. J. H. U. Press, 2006.
15. T. Ito, T. Chiba, and M. YoshidA. Exploring the protein interactome. Trends in Biotechnology, 19(10):S23-7, 2001.
16. M. Remm, C. E. Storm, and E. L. Sonnhammer. Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs. J of Mol Bio, 314(5):1041-1052, 2001.
17. R. Singh, J. Xu, and B. Berger. Pairwise Alignment of Protein Interaction Networks. Proc. of Conf on Res in Comp Mol Bio, RECOMB, 2007.
18. L. Page et al. PageRank Citation System: Bringing Order to the Web. Tech Report. Stanford Dig Lib Proj, 1998.