Rupture process of the 2002 Mw 7.9 Denali earthquake, Alaska, using a newly devised hybrid blind deconvolution method

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 98, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 162-179

  Liao, Boi Yee ^a   Huang, Huey Chu ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECONVOLUTION; KINEMATICS; SEISMIC WAVES; SEISMOLOGY; VELOCITY; VELOCITY MEASUREMENT;

HYBRID BLIND DECONVOLUTION METHOD; RUPTURE PROCESS; RUPTURE VELOCITY;

EARTHQUAKES;

DECONVOLUTION; DENALI EARTHQUAKE 2002; DISPLACEMENT; EARTHQUAKE EPICENTER; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; EARTHQUAKE HYPOCENTER; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; FAULT SLIP; SEISMIC SOURCE; TELESEISMIC WAVE;

EID: 40549124677     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0120050065     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aguirre, J., and K. Irikura (2004). Reliability of envelope inversion for the high-frequency radiation source process using strong motion data: example of the 1995 Hyogoken Nanbu earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 2005-2016.
2. s = 7.2), California earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 97-100.
3. Asano, K., T. Iwata, and K. Irikura (2003). Ground Motion Characteristics and Source Process of the 2002 Denali Earthquake Inferred from the Strong Motion Records (Abstract S12A-0367), EOS Trans. AGU 84 (Fall Meet. Suppl.), S12A-0367.
4. w 5.9, 1999 Athens earthquake inverted from regional seismiological data, Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, no. 15, 1638, doi 10.1029/2001GL014261.
5. Beresnev, I. A. (2004). Uncertainties in finite-fault slip inversions: to what extent to believe?, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 2445-2458.
6. Bertero, M., D. Bindi, P. Boccacci, M. Cattaneo, C. Eva, and V. Lanza (1997). Application of the projected Landweber method to the estimation of the source time function in seismology, Inverse Probl. 13, 456-486.
7. Bertero, M., D. Bindi, P. Boccacci, M. Cattaneo, C. Eva, and V. Lanza (1999). A novel blind-deconvolution method with an application to seismology, Inverse Probl. 14, 815-833.
8. Chen, Y T., and L. S. Xu (2000). A time-domain inversion technique for the tempo-spatial distribution of slip on a finite fault plane with applications to recent large earthquakes in the Tibetan Plateau, Geophys. J. Int. 143, 407-416.
9. Choy, G. L., and J. Boatwright (2004). Radiated energy and the rupture process of the Denali fault earthquake sequence of 2002 from broadband teleseismic body waves, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, no. 6B, S269-S277.
10. w 7.9 Denali fault earthquake (Abstract S72F-1337), EOS Trans. AGU 83 (Fall Meet. Suppl.), S72F-1337.
11. D 5.0 earthquake of 29 January 1995 in the Puget lowland of western Washington: an event on the Seattle fault?, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 86, 1167-1172.
12. Dreger, D. (1994). Empirical Green's function study of the January 17, 1994 Northridge, California earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett. 21, 2633-2636.
13. w 7.9 Denali Fault, Alaska Earthquake (Abstract S72F-1343), EOS Trans. AGU. 83 (Fall Meet. Suppl.), S7217-1343.
14. w 7.9 Denali fault, Alaska earthquake, Seism. Res. Lett. 74, 236.
15. Dunham, E. M., and R. J. Archuleta (2004). Evidence for a supershear transient during the 2002 Denali fault earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, no. 6B, S256-S268.
16. Eberhart-Phillips, D., P. J. Haeussler, J. T. Freymueller, A. D. Frankel, C. M. Rubin, P. Craw, N. A. Ratchkovski, G. Anderson, G. A. Carver, A. J. Crone, T. E. Dawson, H. Fletcher, R. Hansen, E. L. Harp, R. A. Harris, D. P. Hill, S. Hreinsdottir, R. W. Jibson, L. M. Jones, R. Kayen, D. K. Keefer, C. F. Larsen, S. C. Moran, S. F. Personius, G. Plafker, B. Sherrod, K. Sieh, N. Sitar, and W. K. Wallace (2003). The 2002 Denali fault earthquake, Alaska: a large magnitude, slip-partitioned event, Science 300, 1113-1118.
17. Fisher, M. A., W. J. Nokleberg, N. A. Ratchkovski, L. Pellerin, T. M. Brocher, and J. Booker (2004). Geophysical investigation of the Denali fault and Alaska range orogen within the aftershock zone of the October-November 2002, M = 7.9 Denali fault earthquake, Geology 32, 269-272, doi 10.1130/G20127.1.
18. Frankel, A. (2004). Rupture process of the M 7.9 Denali fault, Alaska, earthquake: subevents, directivity, and scaling of high-frequency ground motions, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, no. 6B, S234-S255.
19. Frankel, A. D. (2002). Rupture Process of the M 7.9 Denali Fault, Alaska, Earthquake Determined from Strong-Motion Recordings (Abstract S72F-1340), EOS Trans. AGU 83 (Fall Meet. Suppl.), S72F-1340.
20. Gurelli, M. I., and C. L. Nikias (1995). EVAM: an eigenvector-based algorithm for multichannel blind deconvolution of input colored signals, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 43, 134-149.
21. w 7.9 Denali fault earthquake, Alaska, determined from GPS measurements, 30, no. 13, 1670, doi 10.1029/2003GL017447.
22. Inouye, Y., and T. Sato (1999). Iterative algorithms based on multistage criteria for multichannel blind deconvolution, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 47, 1759-1764.
23. Jin, A., C. A. Moya, and M. Ando (2000). Simultaneous determination of site responses and source parameters of small earthquakes along the Atotsugawa fault Zone, Central Japan, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90, 1430-1445.
24. Kaaresen, K. F., and T. Taxt (1998). Multichannel blind deconvolution of seismic signals, Geophysics 63, 2093-2107.
25. Kennett, B. L. N., and E. R. Engdahl (1991). Travel times for global earthquake location and phase identification, Geophys. J. Int. 105, 429-465.
26. Kikuchi, M., and Y. Yamanaka (2002). Source rupture process of the central Alaska earthquake of November 3, 2002, inferred from teleseismic body waves, ERI, University of Tokyo, Japan, http:// wwweic.eri.u-tokyo.ac.jp/EIC/EIC_News/021103AL-e.html.
27. Lanza, V., D. Spallarossa, M. Cattaneo, D. Bindi, and P. Augliera (1999). Source parameters of small events using constrained deconvolution with empirical Green's functions, Geophys. J. Int. 137, 651-662.
28. Liao, B. Y, and H. C. Huang (2003). A refinement of the generalized blind deconvolution method based on the Gaussian mixture and its application, TAO 14, no. 3, 1-11.
29. Liao, B. Y., and H. C. Huang (2005). Estimation of the source time function based on blind deconvolution with Gaussian mixtures, Pure Appl. Geophys. 162, no. 3, 479-494.
30. McGuire, J. J. (2004). Estimating finite source properties of small earthquake ruptures, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, 377-393.
31. Mendel, J. M. (1983). Optimal Seismic Deconvolution: An Estimation-Based Approach, Academic, New York.
32. Mendel, J. M. (1990). Maximum Likelihood Deconvolution: A Journey into Model-Based Signal Processing, Springer-Verlag, New York.
33. Nakanishi, I. (1991). Source process of the 1989 Sanriku-Oki earthquake, Japan: source function determined using empirical Green's function, J. Phys. Earth. 39, 661-667.
34. Oglesby, D. D., D. S. Dreger, R. A. Harris, N. Ratchkovski, and R. Hansen (2004). Inverse kinematic and forward dynamic models of the 2002 Denali fault earthquake, Alaska, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, no. 6B, S214-S233.
35. Olson, J. V., C. R. Wilson, and R. A. Hansen (2003). Infrasound associated with the 2002 Denali fault earthquake, Alaska, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, no. 23, 2195, doi 10.1029/2003GL018568.
36. Ozacar, A. A., and S. L. Beck (2004). The 2002 Denali fault and 2001 Kunlun fault earthquakes: complex rupture processes of two large strikeslip events, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, no. 6B, S278-S292.
37. Ozacar, A. A., S. L. Beck, and D. H. Christensen (2003). Source process of the 3 November 2002 Denali fault eartbquake (central Alaska) from teleseismic observations, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, no. 12, 1638, doi 10.1029/2003GL017272.
38. Plicka, V., and J. Zahradnik (1998). Inverting seismigrams of weak events for empirical Green's tensor derivatives, Geophys. J. Int. 132, 471-478.
39. Ramillien, G. (2001). Genetic algorithms for geophysical parameter inversion from altimeter data, Geophys. J. Int. 147, 339-402.
40. w 7.9 Denali fault, Alaska, earthquake of 3 November 2002 from regional seismic network data, Seism. Res. Lett. 74, 743-752.
41. Roumelioti, Z., D. Dreger, A. Kiratzi, and N. Theodoulidis (2003). Slip distribution of the 7 September 1999 Athens earthquake inferred from an empirical Green's function study, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 775-782.
42. Roumelioti, Z., A. Kiratzi, and D. Dreger (2004). The source process of the 2001 July 26 Skyros Island (Greece) earthquake, Geophys. J. Int. 156, 541-548.
43. Santamaria, I., C. J. Pantaleon, J. Ibanez, and A. Artes (1999). Deconvolution of seismic data using adaptive Gaussian mixtures, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 37, 855-859.
44. Sileny, J. (1998). Earthquake source parameters and their confidence regions by a genetic algorithm with a "memory", Geophys. J. Int. 134, 228-242.
45. Thio, H. K. (2003). The rupture process of the 2002 Alaska earthquake, Geophys. Res. Abstr. 5, 13,753.
46. Tsuboi, S., D. Komatitsch, C. Ji, and J. Tromp (2003). Broadband modeling of the 2002 Denali fault earthquake on the Earth simulator, Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors 139, 305-312.
47. Vallee, M. (2004). Stabilizing the empirical Green function analysis: development of the projected Landweber method, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, 394-409.
48. Vallee, M., and M. Bouchon (2004). Imaging coseismic rupture in far field by slip patches, Geophys. J. Int. 156, 615-630.
49. Velasco, A. A., C. J. Ammon, and T. Lay (1994). Recent large earthquakes near Cape Mendocino and in the Gorda plate: broadband source time functions, fault orientations and rupture complexities, J. Geophys. Res. 99, 711-728.
50. Xu, L. S., Y. T. Chen, T. L. Teng, and G. Patau (2002). Temporal-spatial rupture process of the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake from IRIS and GEOSCOPE long-period waveform data using aftershocks as empirical Green's functions, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92, 3210-3228.
51. Zhou, Y H., L. S. Xu, and Y. T. Chen (2002). Source process of the 4 June 2000 southern Sumatra, Indonesia, earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92, 2027-2035.
52. Zollo, A., P. Capuano, and S. Singh (1995). Use of small earthquake records to determine the source function of a large earthquake: an alternative method and an application, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 85, 1249-1256.