Shape bias special section Commentaries: The shape of things to come: The future of the shape bias controversy

Developmental Science

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 216-219

  Keil, Frank C ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CHILD; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CHILD; HUMANS;

EID: 40549114313     PISSN: 1363755X     EISSN: 14677687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00668.x     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Ahn, W., Gelman, S.A., Amsterlaw, J.A., Hohenstein, J. Kalish, C.W. (2000). Causal status effect in children's categorization. Cognition, 76, B35 B38.
2. Booth, A.E. Waxman, S.R. (2008). Taking stock as theories of word learning take shape. Developmental Science, DOI:
3. Colunga, E. Smith, L.B. (2008). Knowledge embedded in process: the self-organization of skilled noun learning. Developmental Science, DOI:
4. Ghahramani, Z. Hinton, G.E. (1998). Hierarchical non-linear factor analysis and topographic maps. In M.I. Jordan, M.J. Kearns S.A. Solla (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 10, NIPS*97 (pp. 486 492). Denver, CO, 1-6 December 1997. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
5. Gibson, E.J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York : Appleton-Century-Crofts.
6. Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA : Houghton Mifflin.
7. Keil, F.C. (1991). Theories, concepts, and the acquisition of word meaning. In J.P. Byrnes S.A. Gelman (Eds.), Perspectives on language and cognition: Interrelations in development (pp. 197 224). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
8. Keil, F.C. (1998). Cognitive science and the origins of thought and knowledge. In R.M. Lerner (Ed.), Theoretical models of human development. Volume 1 of W. Damon (Ed.-in-chief) Handbook of child psychology (5th edn.). New York : Wiley.
9. Keil, F.C. (2006). Cognitive science and cognitive development. In W. Damon R. Lerner (Series Eds.) & D. Kuhn R.S. Siegler (Vol. Eds Handbook of child psychology: Vol 2: Cognition, perception, and language (6th edn., pp. 609 635). New York : Wiley.
10. Levin, D.T., Takarae, Y., Miner, A. Keil, F.C. (2001). Efficient visual search by category: specifying the features that mark the difference between artifacts and animals in preattentive vision. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 676 697.
11. Markson, L., Diesendruck, G. Bloom, P. (2008). The shape of thought. Developmental Science, DOI:
12. Rogers, T.T. McClelland, J.L. (2004). Semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
13. Samuelson, L.K. Bloom, P. (2008). The shape of controversy: what counts as an explanation of development? Introduction to the special section. Developmental Science, DOI:
14. Yamamoto, K. Keil, F.C. (2000). The acquisition of Japanese numerical classifiers - linkages between grammatical forms and conceptual categories. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 9, 379 409.