A conceptual model of the variation in parental attendance in response to environmental fluctuation: Foraging energetics of lactating sea lions and fur seals

Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

Volumn 17, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2007, Pages

  Costa, Daniel P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

ENSO; Foraging intensity; Marine mammals; Metabolic ceiling

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; EL NINO-SOUTHERN OSCILLATION; ENERGETICS; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; LACTATION; METABOLISM; PARENTAL CARE; PINNIPED; PREY AVAILABILITY; REPRODUCTION;

ARCTOCEPHALUS GAZELLA; MAMMALIA; NEOPHOCA CINEREA; OTARIIDAE; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 40549104525     PISSN: 10527613     EISSN: 10990755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.917     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Arnbom T, Fedak MA, Boyd IL, McConnell BJ. 1993. Variation in weaning mass of pups in relation to maternal mass, postweaning fast duration, and weaned pup behaviour in southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina) at South Georgia. Canadian Journal of Zoology 71: 1772-1781.
2. Arnould JPY, Hindell MA. 2002. Milk consumption, body composition and pre-weaning growth rates of Australian fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) pups. Journal of Zoology (London) 256: 351-359.
3. Arnould JPY, Boyd IL, Speakman JR. 1996. The relationship between foraging behaviour and energy expenditure in Antarctic fur seals. Journal of Zoology 239: 769-782.
4. Bartholomew GA. 1970. A model for the evolution of pinniped polygyny. Evolution 24: 546-559.
5. Beauplet G, Dubroca L, Guinet C, Cherel Y, Dabin W, Gagne C, Hindell M. 2004. Foraging ecology of subantarctic fur seals Arctocephalus tropicalis breeding on Amsterdam Island: seasonal changes in relation to maternal characteristics and pup growth. Marine Ecology-Progress Series 273: 211-225.
6. Boyd IL. 1996. Temporal scales of foraging in a marine predator. Ecology 77: 426-434.
7. Boyd IL. 1998. Time and energy constraints in pinniped lactation. American Naturalist 152: 717-728.
8. Boyd IL. 1999. Foraging and provisioning in Antarctic fur seals: interannual variability in time-energy budgets. Behavioral Ecology 10: 198-208.
9. Boyd IL, Roberts JP. 1993. Tooth growth in male Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) from South Georgia - an indicator of long-term growth history. Journal of Zoology 229: 177-190.
10. Boyd IL, Lunn NJ, Barton T. 1991. Time budgets and foraging characteristics of lactating Antarctic fur seals. Journal of Animal Ecology 60: 577-592.
11. Boyd IL, Reid K, Bevan RM. 1995. Swimming speed and allocation of time during the dive cycle in Antarctic fur seals. Animal Behaviour 50: 769-784.
12. Chastel O, Weimerskirch H, Jouventin P. 1993. High annual variability in reproductive success and survival of an Antarctic seabird, the snow petrel Pagodroma nivea: a 27-year study. Oecologia (Heidelberg) 94: 278-285.
13. Costa DP. 1987. Isotopic methods for quantifying material and energy intake of free-ranging marine mammals. In Approaches to Marine Mammal Energetics. Allen Press: Lawrence; 43-66.
14. Costa DP. 1991a. Reproductive and foraging energetics of high latitude penguins, albatrosses and pinnipeds - implications for life history patterns. American Zoologist 31: 111-130.
15. Costa DP. 1991b. Reproductive and foraging energetics of pinnipeds: implications for life history paterns. In Behaviour of Pinnipeds, Renouf D (ed.). Chapman & Hall: London; 300-344.
16. Costa DP. 1993. The relationship between reproductive and foraging energetics and the evolution of the Pinnipedia. In Marine Mammals: Advances in Behavioural and Population Biology, Boyd IL (ed.). Oxford University Press: Symposium Zoological Society of London; 293-314.
17. Costa DP, Gales NJ. 2003. Energetics of a benthic diver: seasonal foraging ecology of the Australian sea lion Neophoca cinerea. Ecological Monographs 73: 27-43.
18. Costa DP, Gentry RL. 1986. Free-ranging energetics of northern fur seals. In Fur Seals: Maternal Strategies on Land and at Sea, Gentry RL, Kooyman GL (eds). Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ; 79-101.
19. Costa DP, Croxall JP, Duck CD. 1989. Foraging energetics of Antarctic fur seals in relation to changes in prey availability. Ecology 70: 596-606.
20. Costa DP, Antonelis GP, De Long RL. 1990. Effects of El Niño on the foraging energetics of the California sea lion. In Effects of El Niño on Pinnipeds, Trillmich F, Ono K (eds). Springer: Berlin; 156-165.
21. Costa DP, Goebel ME, Sterling JE. 2000. Foraging energetics and diving behavior of the Antarctic fur seal. Arctocephalus gazella at Cape Shirreff, Livingston Island. In Antarctic Ecosystems: Models for Wider Ecological Understanding, Davisons W, Howard-Williams C, Broady P (eds). New Zealand Natural Sciences Press: Christchurch, New Zealand; 77-84.
22. Costa DP, Kuhn CE, Weise MJ, Shaffer SA, Arnould JP. 2004. When does physiology limit the foraging behaviour of freely diving mammals? International Congress Series 1275: 359-366.
23. Croxall JP, McCann TS, Prince PA, Rothery P. 1988. Reproductive performance of seabirds and seals at South Georgia and Signy Island, South Orkney Islands, 1976-1987: implications for Southern Ocean monitoring studies. In Antarctic Ocean and Resource Variability, Sahrhage D (ed.). Springer: Berlin.
24. Croxall JP, Reid K, Prince PA. 1999. Diet, provisioning and productivity responses of marine predators to differences in availability of Antarctic krill. Marine Ecology Progress Series 177: 115-131.
25. Fedak MA, Arnbom TA, McConnell BJ, Chambers C, Boyd IL, Harwood J, McCann TS. 1994. Expenditure, investment, and acquisition of energy in southern elephant seals. In Elephant Seals: Population Ecology, Behavior, and Physiology, Le Boeuf BJ, Laws RM (eds). University of California Press: Berkeley, CA; 354-373.
26. Feldkamp SD, De Long RL, Antonelis GA. 1991. Effects of El Niño 1983 on foraging patterns of California sea lions (Zalophus californianus) near San Miguel Island, California. In Pinnipeds and El Niño: Responses to Environmental Stress, Trillmich F, Ono K (eds). Ecological Studies 88. Springer: Berlin; 146-155.
27. Georges JY, Guinet C. 2000. Maternal care in the subantarctic fur seals on Amsterdam Island. Ecology 81: 295-308.
28. Golet GH, Kuletz KJ, Roby DD, Irons DB. 2000. Adult prey choice affects chick growth and reproductive success in Pigeon Guillemots. Auk 117: 82-91.
29. Hunt Jr GL, Stabeno P, Walters G, Sinclair E, Brodeur RD, Napp JM, Bond NA. 2002. Climate change and control of the southeastern Bering Sea pelagic ecosystem. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 49: 5821-5853.
30. Inchausti P, Guinet C, Koudil M, Durbec JP, Barbraud C, Weimerskirch H, Cherel Y, Jouventin P. 2003. Inter-annual variability in the breeding performance of seabirds in relation to oceanographic anomalies that affect the Crozet and the Kerguelen sectors of the Southern Ocean. Journal of Avian Biology 34: 170-176.
31. Mattlin RH, Gales NJ, Costa DP. 1998. Seasonal dive behaviour of lactating New Zealand fur seals (Arctocephalus forsteri). Canadian Journal of Zoology 76: 350-360.
32. Merrick RL, Loughlin TR. 1997. Foraging behavior of adult female and young-of-the-year Steiler sea lions in Alaskan waters. Canadian Journal of Zoology 75: 776-786.
33. Murphy EJ, Watkins JL, Reid K, Trathan PN, Everson I, Croxall JP, Priddle J, Brandon MA, Brierley AS, Hofmann E. 1998. Interannual variability of the South Georgia marine ecosystem: biological and physical sources of variation in the abundance of krill. Fisheries Oceanography 7: 381-390.
34. Ono KA, Boness DJ, Oftedal OT. 1987. The effects of a natural environment disturbance on maternal investment and pup behavior in the California sea lion. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 21: 109-118.
35. Palacios DM. 2004. Seasonal patterns of sea-surface temperature and ocean color around the Galapagos: regional and local influences. Deep-Sea Research Part II-Topical Studies in Oceanography 51: 43-57.
36. Phillips RA, Caldow RWG, Furness RW. 1996. The influence of food availability on the breeding effort and reproductive success of Arctic Skuas Stercorarius parasiticus. Ibis 138: 410-419.
37. Phillips RA, Catry P, Thompson DR, Hamer KC, Furness RW. 1997. Inter-colony variation in diet and reproductive performance of great skuas Catharacta skua. Marine Ecology Progress Series 152: 285-293.
38. Prince PA, Ricketts C. 1981. Relationships between food supply and growth in albatrosses: an interspecies chick fostering experiment. Ornis Scandinavica 12: 207-210.
39. Shea RE, Ricklefs RE. 1996. Temporal variation in growth performance in six species of tropical, pelagic seabirds. Journal of Animal Ecology 65: 29-42.
40. Sinclair EH, Loughlin TR, Pearcy W. 1994. Prey selection by northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) in the eastern Bering Sea. Fishery Bulletin (Seattle) 92: 144-156.
41. Trillmich F. 1996. Parental investment in pinnipeds. In Advances in the Study of Behavior; Parental Care: Evolution, Mechanisms, and Adaptive Significance, Rosenblatt JS, Snowdon CT (eds). Academic Press Inc.; 533-577.
42. Trillmich F, Limberger D. 1985. Drastic effects of El Niño on Galapagos [Ecuador] pinnipeds. Oecologia (Berlin) 67: 19-22.
43. Trillmich F, Weissing FJ. 2006. Lactation patterns of pinnipeds are not explained by optimization of maternal energy delivery rates. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 59: 1-13.
44. Trillmich F, Ono KA, Costa DP, DeLong RL, Feldkamp SD, Francis JM, Gentry RL, Heath CB, LeBoeuf BJ, Majluf P. 1991. The effects of El Niño on Pinniped populations in the Eastern Pacific. In Effects of El Niño on Pinnipeds, Trillmich F, Ono K (eds). Springer: Berlin; 247-270.
45. Weimerskirch H, Lys P. 2000. Seasonal changes in the provisioning behaviour and mass of male and female wandering albatrosses in relation to the growth of their chick. Polar Biology 23: 733-744.
46. Williams TD, Croxall JP. 1991a. Annual variation in breeding biology of Macaroni penguins, Eudyptes chrysolophus, at Bird Island, South Georgia. Journal of Zoology 223: 189-202.
47. Williams TD, Croxall JP. 1991b. Chick growth and survival in gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua): effect of hatching asynchrony and variation in food supply. Polar Biology 11: 197-202.