Comparing the effect of habitat on the magnitude of inbreeding depression in the Mediterranean native Senecio malacitanus and the alien S. inaequidens: Consequences for invasive ability

Botany

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 63-75

  Garcia Serrano, Hèctor ^a   Escarré, Josep ^b   Caño, Lidia ^a   Sans, F Xavier ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Competition; Fitness; Herbivory; Inbreeding coefficient; Self compatibility level; Water stress

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FAILURE ANALYSIS; SEED;

INBREEDING COEFFICIENT; SELF-COMPATIBILITY LEVEL; WATER STRESS;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

ANGIOSPERM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); FITNESS; HABITAT; HERBIVORY; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; INVASIBILITY; INVASIVE SPECIES; MAGNITUDE; NATIVE SPECIES; SELF INCOMPATIBILITY; WATER STRESS;

SENECIO; SENECIO INAEQUIDENS; SENECIO MALACITANUS;

EID: 40449109915     PISSN: 19162804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/B07-117     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Abbot, R.J., and Forbes, D.G. 1993. Outcrossing rate and self-incompatibility in the colonizing species Senecio squalidus. Heredity, 71: 155-159.
2. Allard, R.W. 1965. Genetic systems associated with colonizing ability in predominantly self-pollinated species. In The genetics of colonizing species. Edited by H.G. Baker and G.L. Stebbins. Academic Press, New York. pp. 49-75.
3. Alpert, P., Bone, E., and Holzapfel, C. 2000. Invasiveness, invasibility and the role of environmental stress in the spread of non-native plants. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 3: 52-66. doi:10.1078/1433-8319-00004.
4. Amsellem, L., Noyer, J.L., Le Bourgeois, T., and Hossaert-McKey, M. 2000. Comparison of genetic diversity of the invasive weed Rubus alceifolius Poir. (Rosaceae) in its native range and in areas of introduction, using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. Mol. Ecol. 9: 443-455. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00876.x.
5. Armbruster, P., and Reed, D.H. 2005. Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity, 95: 235-242. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy. 6800721.
6. Baker, H.G. 1965. Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. In The genetics of colonizing species. Edited by H.G. Baker and G.L. Stebbins. Academic Press, New York pp. 147-172.
7. Baker, H.G. 1974. The evolution of weeds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5: 1-24. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.000245.
8. Baker, H.G., and Stebbins, G.L. 1965. The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, London, UK.
9. Bakker, J., and Wilson, S. 2001. Competitive abilities of introduced and native grasses. Plant Ecol. 157: 119-125. doi:10.1023/A:1013972403293.
10. Barrett, S.C.H., and Richardson, B.J. 1986. Genetic attributes of invading species. In Ecology of biological invasions. Edited by R.H. and J.J. Burdon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 22-33.
11. Blossey, B., and Notzold, R. 1995. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants - a hypothesis. J. Ecol. 83: 887-889. doi:10.2307/2261425.
12. Brennan, A.C., Harris, S.A., and Hiscock, S.J. 2003. The population genetics of sporophytic self-incompatibility in Senecio squalidus L. (Asteraceae): avoidance of mating constraints imposed by low S-allele number. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 358: 1047-1050. doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1300.
13. Brown, A.H.D., and Burdon, J.J. 1987. Mating systems and colonizing success in plants. In Colonisation, succession and stability. Edited by A.J. Gray, M.J. Crawley, and P.J. Edwards. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK. pp. 115-131.
14. Burke, M.J.W., and Grime, J.P. 1996. An experimental study of plant community invasibility. Ecology, 77: 776-790. doi:10.2307/2265501.
15. Caño, L. 2007. Factores ecológicos y evolutivos que regulan la capacidad invasora de Senecio pterophorus DC. y S. inaequidens DC. (Asteraceae) en el NE de la Península Ibérica. PhD. thesis. University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
16. Caño, L., Escarré, J., and Sans, F.X. 2007. Factors affecting the invasion success of Senecio inaequidens and S. pterophorus in Mediterranean plant communities: how to manage these species in protected areas. J. Veg. Sci. 18: 281-288.
17. Carr, D.E., and Dudash, M.R. 1996. Inbreeding depression in two species of Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae) with contrasting mating systems. Am. J. Bot. 83: 586-593. doi:10.2307/2445917.
18. Carr, D.E., and Eubanks, M. 2002. Inbreeding alters resistance to insect herbivory and host plant quality in Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution, 56: 22-30.
19. Charlesworth, D., and Charlesworth, B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 237-268. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.001321.
20. Charlesworth, D., Morgan, M.T., and Charlesworth, B. 1990. Inbreeding depression, genetic load, and the evolution of outcrossing rates in a multilocus system with no linkage. Evolution, 44: 1469-1489. doi:10.2307/2409330.
21. Cheptou, P.O., Berger, A., Blanchard, A., Collin, C., and Escarre, J. 2000a. The effect of drought stress on inbreeding depression in four populations of the Mediterranean outcrossing plant Crepis sancta (Asteraceae). Heredity, 85: 294-302. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00759. x.
22. Cheptou, P.O., Imbert, E., Lepart, J., and Escarre, J. 2000b. Effects of competition on lifetime estimates of inbreeding depression in the outcrossing plant Crepis sancta (Asteraceae). J. Evol. Biol. 13: 522-531. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00175.x.
23. Cheptou, P.O., Lepart, J., and Escarre, J. 2002. Mating system variation along a successional gradient in the allogamous and colonizing plant Crepis sancta (Asteraceae). J. Evol. Biol. 15: 753-762. doi:10.1046/j.1420- 9101.2002.00443.x.
24. Colautti, R.I., Ricciardi, A., Grigorovich, I.A., and MacIsaac, H.J. 2004. Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol. Lett. 7: 721-733. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00616.x.
25. Davis, M.A., and Thompson, K. 2000. Eight ways to be a coloniser; two ways to be an invader: a proposed nomenclature scheme for invasion ecology. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 81: 226-230.
26. Davis, M.A., Grime, J., and Thompson, K. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J. Ecol. 88: 528-534. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00473.x.
27. De Mauro, M.M. 1993. Relationship of breeding system to rarity in the Lakeside Daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var. glabra). Conserv. Biol. 7: 542-550. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07030542.x.
28. Dudash, M.R., Carr, D.E., and Fenster, C.B. 1997. Five generation of enforced selfing and outcrossing in Mimulus guttatus: inbreeding depression variation at the population and family level. Evolution, 51: 54-65. doi:10.2307/2410960.
29. Ernst, W.H.O. 1998. Invasion, dispersal and ecology of the South African neophyte Senecio inaequidens in the Netherlands: from wool alien to railway and road alien. Acta Bot. Neerl. 47: 131-151.
30. Fogarty, G., and Facelli, J.M. 1999. Growth and competition of Cytisus scoparius, an invasive shrub, and Australian native shrubs. Plant Ecol. 144: 27-35. doi:10.1023/A:1009808116068.
31. Fox, G.A. 1993. Failure time analysis: emergence, flowering, survivorship and other waiting times. In Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Edited by S.M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch. Chapman & Hall, New York. pp. 253-289.
32. Garcia-Serrano, H., Escarré, J., and Sans, F.X. 2004. Factors that limit the emergence and establishment of the related aliens Senecio inaequidens and S. pterophorus and the native S. malacitanus in Mediterranean climate. Can. J. Bot. 82: 1346-1355. doi:10.1139/b04-097.
33. Garcia-Serrano, H., Escarré, J., Garnier, E., and Sans, F.X. 2005. A comparative growth analysis between alien and native Senecio species with distinct distribution ranges. Ecoscience, 12: 35-43. doi:10.2980/i1195-6860-12-1-35.1.
34. Garcia-Serrano, H., Sans, F.X., and Escarré, J. 2007. Interspecific competition between alien and native congeneric species. Acta Oecol. 31: 69-78. doi:10.1016/j.actao.2006.09.005.
35. Gerlach, J.D., and Rice, K.J. 2003. Testing life history correlates of invasiveness using congeneric plant species. Ecol. Appl. 13: 167-179. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0167:TLHCOI]2.0.CO;2.
36. Grotkopp, E., Rejmanek, M., and Rost, T.L. 2002. Toward a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) species. Am. Nat. 159: 396-419. doi:10.1086/338995.
37. Hayes, C.N., Winsor, J.A., and Stephenson, A.G. 2004. Inbreeding influences herbivory in Cucurbita pepo ssp texana (Cucurbitaceae). Oecologia, 140: 601-608. doi:10.1007/s00442-004-1623-2.
38. Hiscock, S.J. 2000a. Genetic control of self-incompatibility in Senecio squalidus L. (Asteraceae): a successful colonizing species. Heredity, 85: 10-19. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00692.x.
39. Hiscock, S.J. 2000b. Self-incompatibility in Senecio squalidus L. (Asteraceae). Ann. Bot. (Lond.), 85: 181-190. doi:10.1006/anbo.1999.1058.
40. Holtsford, T.P. 1996. Variation in inbreeding depression among families and populations of Clarkia fembloriensis, Onagraceae. Heredity, 76: 83-91.
41. Husband, B.C., and Schemske, D.W. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution, 50: 54-70. doi:10.2307/2410780.
42. Imbert, E., Escarré, J., and Lepart, J. 1996. Achene dimorphism and among population variation in Crepis sancta (Asteraceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 157: 309-315. doi:10.1086/297350.
43. INM. 2001. Guía resumida del clima en España 1971-2000. Plan Estadístico Nacional 2001-2004. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente; Dirección General del Instituto Nacional de Meteorología.
44. Ivey, C.T., Carr, D.E., and Eubanks, M. 2004. Effects of inbreeding in Mimulus guttatus on tolerance to herbivory in natural environments. Ecology, 85: 567-574. doi:10.1890/02-0730.
45. Johnston, M.O. 1992. Effects of cross and self-fertilization on progeny fitness in Lobelia cardinalis and L. siphilitica. Evolution, 46: 688-702. doi:10.2307/2409638.
46. Keane, R.M., and Crawley, M.J. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 164-170. doi:10.1016/S0169- 5347(02)02499-0.
47. Kirkpatrick, M., and Jarne, P. 2000. The effects of a bottleneck on inbreeding depression and the genetic load. Am. Nat. 155: 154-167. doi:10.1086/303312.
48. Koelewijn, H.P. 1998. Effects of different levels of inbreeding on progeny fitness in Plantago coronopus. Evolution, 52: 692-702. doi:10.2307/2411264.
49. Kolar, C.S., and Lodge, D.M. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 199-204. doi:10.1016/S0169- 5347(01)02101-2.
50. Kolb, A., Alpert, P., Enters, D., and Holzapfel, C. 2002. Patterns of invasion within a grassland community. J. Ecol. 90: 871-881. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00719.x.
51. Lafuma, L., and Maurice, S. 2007. Increase in mate availability without loss of self-incompatibility in the invasive species Senecio inaequidens (Asteraceae). Oikos, 116: 201-208. doi:10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.15220.x.
52. Lande, R., and Schemske, D.W. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. 1. Genetic models. Evolution, 39: 24-40. doi:10.2307/2408514.
53. Levine, J.M., and D'Antonio, C.M. 1999. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos, 87: 15-26. doi:10.2307/3546992.
54. Lloyd, D.G. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. Am. Nat. 113: 67-79. doi:10.1086/283365.
55. Lodge, D.M. 1993. Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 133-137. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(93)90025-K.
56. Lonsdale, W.M. 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology, 80: 1522-1536.
57. López-García, M.C., and Maillet, J. 2005. Biological characteristics of an invasive South African species. Biol. Invasions, 7: 181-194. doi:10.1007/s10530-004-8978-5.
58. Mack, R.N. 1996. Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders: emergent and emerging approaches. Biol. Conserv. 78: 107-121. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(96)00021-3.
59. Mack, R.N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W.M., Evans, H., Clout, M., and Bazzaz, F.A. 2000. Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 10: 689-710. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000) 010[0689:BICEGC]2.0.CO;2.
60. Marshall, D.L., Levin, D.A., and Fowler, N.L. 1986. Plasticity of yield components in response to stress in Sesbiana macrocarpa and Sesbiana vesicaria (Leguminosae). Am. Nat. 127: 508-521. doi:10.1086/284499.
61. Morgan, M.T., Schoen, D.J., and Bataillon, T.M. 1997. The evolution of self fertilisation in perennials. Am. Nat. 150: 618-638. doi:10.1086/286085.
62. Nason, J.D., and Ellstrand, N.C. 1995. Lifetime estimates of biparental inbreeding depression in the self-incompatible annual plant Raphanus sativus. Evolution, 49: 307-316. doi:10.2307/2410341.
63. Nielsen, L.R., Siegismund, H.R., and Philipp, M. 2003. Partial self-incompatibility in the polyploid endemic species Scalesia affinis (Asteraceae) from the Galapagos: remnants of a self-incompatibility system? Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 142: 93-101. doi:10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.00168.x.
64. Noble, I.R. 1989. Attributes of invaders and the invading process: terrestrial and vascular plants. In Biological invasions: a global perspective. Edited by J.A. Drake, H.A. Mooney, F. di Castri, R.H. Groves, F.J. Kruger, M. Rejmánek, and M. Williamson. Wiley, Chichester, UK. pp. 301-313.
65. Perrins, J., Fitter, A., and Williamson, M. 1993. Population biology and rates of invasion of 3 introduced Impatiens species in the British Isles. J. Biogeogr. 20: 33-44. doi:10.2307/2845737.
66. Peto, R., and Peto, J. 1972. Assimptotically efficient rank invariant procedures (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. A, 135: 185-206.
67. Pimentel, D., Lach, L., Zuniga, R., and Morrison, D. 2000. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience, 50: 53-65. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0053:EAECON]2.3.CO;2.
68. Price, S.C., and Jain, S.K. 1981. Are inbreeders better colonizers? Oecologia, 49: 283-286. doi:10.1007/BF00349202.
69. Prieur-Richard, A.H., and Lavorel, S. 2000. Do more diverse plant communities greater resistance to invasions? Rev. Ecol. (Terre Vie), 7(Suppl.): 37-51.
70. Radford, I.J., and Cousens, R.D. 2000. Invasiveness and comparative life-history traits of exotic and indigenous Senecio species in Australia. Oecologia, 125: 531-542. doi:10.1007/s004420000474.
71. Reinartz, J.A., and Les, D.H. 1994. Bottleneck-induced dissolution of self-incompatibility and breeding system consequences in Aster furcatus (Asteraceae). Am. J. Bot. 81: 446-455. doi:10.2307/2445494.
72. Rejmánek, M., and Richardson, D.M. 1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology, 77: 1655-1661. doi:10.2307/2265768.
73. Richards, A.J. 1997. Plant breeding systems. 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.
74. Sakai, A.K., Allendorf, F.W., Holt, J.S., Lodge, D.M., Molofsky, J., With, K.A., Baughman, S., Cabin, R.J., Cohen, J.E., Ellstrand, N.C., McCauley, D.E., O'Neil, P., Parker, I.M., Thompson, J.N., and Weller, S.G. 2001. The population biology of invasive species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32: 305-332. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114037.
75. Sans, F.X., Garcia-Serrano, H., and Afan, I. 2004. Life-history traits of alien and native Senecio species in the Mediterranean region. Acta Oecol. 26: 167-178. doi:10.1016/j.actao.2004.04.001.
76. Schemske, D.W. 1983. Breeding system and habitat effects on fitness components in three neotropical Costus (Zigiberaceae). Evolution, 37: 523-539. doi:10.2307/2408265.
77. Snyder, K.M., Baskin, J.M., and Baskin, C.C. 1994. Comparative ecology of the narrow endemic Echinacea tenesseensis and two geographically widespread congener: relative competitive ability and growth characteristics. Int. J. Plant Sci. 155: 57-65. doi:10.1086/297147.
78. Stastny, M., Schaffner, U., and Elle, E. 2005. Do vigour of introduced populations and escape from specialist herbivores contribute to invasiveness? J. Ecol. 93: 27-37. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2004.00962.x.
79. Stebbins, G.L. 1957. Self-fertilitzation and population variability in higher plants. Am. Nat. 91: 337-354. doi:10.1086/281999.
80. Thébaud, C., Finzi, A.C., Affre, L., Debussche, M., and Escarré, J. 1996. Assessing why two introduced Conyza differ in their ability to invade Mediterranean old fields. Ecology, 77: 791-804. doi:10.2307/2265502.
81. Thelen, G.C., Vivanco, J.M., Newingham, B., Good, W., Bais, H.P., Landres, P., Caesar, A., and Callaway, R.M. 2005. Insect herbivory stimulates allelopathic exudation by an invasive plant and the suppression of natives. Ecol. Lett. 8: 209-217. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00713.x.
82. Torchin, M.E., Lafferty, K.D., Dobson, A.P., McKenzie, V.J., and Kuris, A.M. 2003. Introduced species and their missing parasites. Nature (London), 421: 628-630. doi:10.1038/nature01346.
83. Uyenoyama, M.K., Holsinger, K.E., and Waller, D.M. 1993. Ecological and genetic factors directing the evolution of self-fertilization. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 9: 327-381.
84. Vitousek, P.M., and Walker, L.R. 1987. Biological invasion of Myrica faya alters ecosystem development in Hawaii. Science, 238: 802-804. doi:10.1126/science.238.4828.802.
85. Watson, M.A., and Casper, B.B. 1984. Morphogenetic constraints on patterns of carbon distribution in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 233-258. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.001313.
86. Willis, A.J., Thomas, M.B., and Lawton, J.H. 1999. Is the increased vigour of invasive weeds explained by a trade-off between growth and herbivore resistance? Oecologia, 120: 632-640. doi:10.1007/s004420050899.
87. Wright, S. 1922. Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Am. Nat. 56: 330-338. doi:10.1086/279872.