He said, she said: Gender and angling specialization, motivations, ethics, and behaviors

Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 301-315

  Schroeder, Susan A ^a   Fulton, David C ^a   Currie, Leigh ^b   Goeman, Tim ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b University of Minnesota's Department of Fisheries Wildlife and Conservation Biology   (United States)

^c MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Angling specialization; Behaviors; Ethics; Gender; Motivations

Indexed keywords

EID: 40449086156     PISSN: 10871209     EISSN: 1533158X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10871200600894928     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Backman, S. J., and Wright, B. A., 1993. An exploratory study of the relationship of attitude and the perception of constraints to hunting. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 11:1–16.
2. Barro, S. C., and Manfredo, M. J., 1996. Constraints, psychological investment, and hunting participation:Development and testing of a model. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1:42–61.
3. Bricker, K. S., and Kerstetter, D. L., 2000. Level of specialization and place attachment:An exploratory study of whitewater recreationists. Leisure Sciences, 22:233–257.
4. Bryan, H., 1977. Leisure value systems and recreational specialization:The case of trout fishermen. Journal of Leisure Research, 9:174–197.
5. Ditton, R. B., 2004. “ Human dimensions of fisheries ”. In Society and natural resources:A summary of knowledge, Edited by:Manfredo, M. J., Vaske, J. J., Bruyere, B. L., Field, D. R., and Brown, P. J., 199–208. Jefferson, MO:Modern Litho.
6. Ditton, R. B., Loomis, D. K., and Choi, S., 1992. Recreation specialization:Re-conceptualization from a social worlds perspective. Journal of Leisure Research, 24:33–51.
7. Driver, B. L., Tinsley, H. E. A., and Manfredo, M. J., 1991. “ The paragraphs about leisure and recreation experience preference scales:Results from two inventories designed to access the breadth of the perceived psychological benefits of leisure ”. In Benefits of leisure, Edited by:Driver, B. L., Peterson, G. L., and Brown, P. J., 263–286. State College, PA:Venture Press.
8. Fedler, A. J., and Ditton, R. B., 1994. Understanding angler motivations in fisheries management. Fisheries, 19:6–13.
9. Finn, K. L., and Loomis, D. K., 2001. The importance of catch motives of recreational anglers:The effects of catch satiation and deprivation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 6:173–187.
10. Henderson, K. A., 1990. The meaning of leisure for women:An integrative review of the research. Journal of Leisure Research, 22:228–243.
11. Henderson, K. A., 1994. Perspectives on analyzing gender, women, and leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 26:119–137.
12. Henderson, K. A., 1996. One size doesn't fit all:The meanings of women's leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 28:139–154.
13. Hunt, L., Haider, W., and Armstrong, K., 2002. Understanding the fish harvesting decisions by anglers. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 7:75–89.
14. Manning, R. E., 1999. Studies in outdoor recreation:Search and research for satisfaction, 2nd, Corvallis:Oregon State University Press.
15. McFarlane, B. L., Watson, D. O., and Boxall, P. C., 2003. Women hunters in Alberta, Canada:Girl power or guys in disguise?. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 8:165–180.
16. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. (2004a). Fish and fishing. Retrieved January 13, 2004, from http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/faq/mnfacts/fishing.html
17. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. (2004b). Who pays for the DNR? Retrieved January 13, 2004, from http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/budget/whopays/funding_userfees.html
18. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. (2005). 2005 Minnesota fishing regulations. Retrieved February 2, 2005, from http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/rlp/regulations/fishing/fishing.pdf
19. Moeller, G. H., and Engelken, J. H., 1972. What fishermen look for in a fishing experience. Journal of Wildlife Management, 36:1253–1257.
20. Reiger, G., 1996. The angling tradition. Field and Stream, 101:14–15.
21. Salz, R. J., Loomis, D. K., and Finn, K. L., 2001. Development and validation of a specialization index and testing of specialization theory. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 6:239–258.
22. Shaw, S., 1985. Gender and leisure:Inequality in the distribution of leisure time. Journal of Leisure Research, 17:266–282.
23. Shaw, S., 1994. Gender, leisure, and constraint:Towards a framework for the analysis of women's leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 26:8–22.
24. Toth, J. F., Jr. and Brown, R. B., 1997. Racial and gender meanings of why people participate in recreational fishing. Leisure Sciences, 19:129–146.
25. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 2002. 2001 National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation, Washington, DC:U.S. Government Printing Office.
26. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 2004. Participation and expenditure patterns of African-American, Hispanic, and Female hunters and anglers:Addendum to the 2001 National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation, Washington, DC:U.S. Government Printing Office.
27. Wearing, B., 1991. Leisure and women's identity:Conformity or individuality?. Loisir et Société, 14:575–586.
28. Witter, D. J., Haverland, P. S., Belusz, L. C., and Hicks, C. E., 1982. Missouri trout park anglers:Their motives and opinions of management, St. Paul:University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station. (Misc. Pub. 18)
29. Zinn, H. C., and Pierce, C. L., 2002. Values, gender, and concern about potentially dangerous wildlife. Environment and Behavior, 34:239–256.