Understanding the fish harvesting decisions by anglers

Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 75-89

  Hunt, Len ^a   Haider, Wolfgang ^b   Armstrong, Kim ^a  

^a Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research   (United States)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Behavior; Motivations; Recreational Fishing; Social Group; Substitution; Tourism

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646514928     PISSN: 10871209     EISSN: 1533158X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10871200290089355     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
2. Armstrong, K., McMahon, P., & Hunt, L. (1999). Fish harvest and angler characteristics in the resource-based tourism industry. Northwest Science and Tech. Report TR- 121, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Thunder Bay, ON.
3. Buchanan, T., Christensen, J. E., & Burdge, R. J. (1981). Social groups and the meanings of outdoor recreation activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 13, 254-266.
4. Burch, W. R. Jr. (1969). The social circles of leisure: Competing explanations. Journal of Leisure Research, 1, 125-147.
5. Bryan, H. (1977). Leisure value systems and recreational specialization: The case of trout fishermen. Journal of Leisure Research, 9, 174-187.
6. Choi, S., Loomis, D. K., & Ditton, R. B. (1994). Effect of social group, activity, and specialization on recreation substitution decisions. Leisure Sciences, 16, 143-159.
7. Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd Ed.). New York: Wiley.
8. Ditton, R. B., & Fedler, A. J. (1989). Importance of fish consumption to sport fishermen: A reply to Matlock et al. (1988). Fisheries, 14(4), 4-6.
9. Dottavio, F. D., O’Leary, J. T., & Koth, B. (1980). The social group variable in recreation participation studies. Journal of Leisure Research, 12, 357-367.
10. Driver, B. L. (1977). Item pool for scales designed to quantify the psychological outcomes desired and expected from recreation participation. Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
11. Fedler, A. J., & Ditton, R. B. (1994). Understanding angler motivations in fisheries management. Fisheries, 19(4), 6-13.
12. Field, D. R., & O’Leary, R. B. (1973). Social groups as a basis for assessing participation in selected water activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 5, 16-25.
13. Fishbein, M. (1967). Attitude and the prediction of behavior. In M. Fishbein (Ed.) Readings in attitude theory and measurement (pp. 477-492). New York: Wiley.
14. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15. Fisher, M. R. (1997). Segmentation of the angler population by catch preference, participation, and experience: A management-oriented application of recreation specialization. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 17(1), 1-10.
16. Glancy, M., & Little, S. L. (1995). Studying the social aspects of leisure: Development of the multiple-method field investigation model (MMFI). Journal of Leisure Research, 27(4), 305-325.
17. Haider, W., & Hunt, L. (1997). Remote tourism in northern Ontario: Patterns of supply and a motivational segmentation of clients. Journal of Applied Recreation Research, 22, 49-78.
18. Jager, J. C., & Looman, C. W. N. (1995). Chapter 2: Data collection. In R. H. G. Jongman, C. J. F. Ter Braak, & O. F. R. Van Tongeren (Eds.) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology (pp. 10-28). New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Matlock, G. C. (1991). The East Matagorda Bay experience: The saga continues. Fisheries, 16(6), 20-22.
20. Matlock, G. C., Saul, G. E., & Bryan, C. E. (1988). Importance of fish consumption to sport fishermen. Fisheries, 13(1), 25-26.
21. Mead, R. (1988). The design of experiments: Statistical principles for practical applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Peyton, R. B., & Gigliotti, L. M. (1989). The utility of sociological research: A re-examination of the East Matagorda Bay experience. Fisheries, 14(4), 5-7.
23. Renyard, T. S., & Hilborn, R. (1986). Sports angler preferences for alternative regulatory methods. Canadian Journal of Aquatic Sciences, 43, 240-242.
24. Shelby, B., & Vaske, J. J. (1991). Resource and activity substitutes for recreational salmon fishing in New Zealand. Leisure Sciences, 13, 21-32.
25. Stokowski, P. A. (1990). Extending the social groups model: Social network analysis in recreation research. Leisure Sciences, 12, 251-263.
26. Stokowski, P.A. (1992). Social networks and tourist behavior. American Behavioral Scientist, 36(2), 212-221.
27. Trellis, G. G. (1991). Importance of fish consumption to sport fishermen: An economic analysis. Fisheries, 16(6), 13-18.
28. Vaske, J. J., Donnelly, M. P., & Shelby, B. (1990). Comparing two approaches for identifying recreation activity substitutes. Leisure Sciences, 12, 289-302.
29. Vaske, J. J., Donnelly, M. P., & Tweed, D. L. (1983). Recreationist-defined versus research-defined similarity judgments in substitutability research. Journal of Leisure Research, 15, 251-262.
30. Weiers, R. M. (1984). Marketing research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.