Capillary bridges in electric fields

Langmuir

Volumn 20, Issue 16, 2004, Pages 6770-6777

  Klingner, Anke ^a   Buehrle, Juergen ^a   Mugele, Frieder ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHARGE COUPLED DEVICES; CONTACT ANGLE; ELECTRIC CHARGE; ELECTRODES; ELECTROSTATICS; FREE ENERGY; INDIUM COMPOUNDS; MORPHOLOGY; OSCILLATIONS; THRESHOLD VOLTAGE; TIN COMPOUNDS;

CAPILLARY BRIDGES; ELECTROWETTING; LAPLACE EQUATIONS; MICROFLUIDIC SYSTEMS;

ELECTRIC FIELDS;

EID: 4043177080     PISSN: 07437463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/la036058j     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Microsystem Technology in Chemistry and Life Science; Manz, A., Becker, H., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, 1998; Vol. 194.
2. Whitesides, G. M.; Stroock, A. D.Phys. Today 2001, 54, 42. Pfohl, T.; Mugele, F.; Seemann, R.; Herminghaus, S. ChemPhysChem 2003, 4, 1291.
3. Whitesides, G. M.; Stroock, A. D.Phys. Today 2001, 54, 42. Pfohl, T.; Mugele, F.; Seemann, R.; Herminghaus, S. ChemPhysChem 2003, 4, 1291.
4. Jakeway, S. C.; de Mello, A. J.; Russell, E. L. Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem. 2000, 366, 325-539.
5. Prins, M. W. J.; Welters, W. J. J.; Weekamp, J. W. Science 2001, 291, 277.
6. Pollack, M. G.; Fair, R. B.; Shenderov, A. D. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 77, 1725-1726.
7. Sandre, O.; Gorre-Talini, L.; Ajdari, A.; Frost, J.; Silberzan, P. Phys. Rev. E 1999, 60, 2964-2972.
8. Jones, T. B.; Gunji, M.; Washizu, M.; Feldman, M. J. J. Appl. Phys. 2001, 89, 1441-1448.
9. Cho, S. K.; Moon, H.; Kim, C.-J. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2003, 12, 70-80.
10. Quilliet, C.; Berge, B. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2001, 6, 1.
11. Pollack, M. G.; Shenderov, A. D.; Fair, R. B. Lab Chip 2002, 2, 96-101.
12. Klingner, A.; Herminghaus, S.; Mugele, F.Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 4187-4189.
13. Teflon AF, Amorphous Fluoropolymer, DuPont, P.O. Box 80702, Wilmington, DE 19880-0702.
14. Seyrat, E.; Hayes, R. A. J. Appl. Phys. 2001, 90, 1383-1386.
15. LabView Graphical Programming for Instrumentation from National Instruments.
16. Brakke, K. Exp. Math. 1992, 1, 141.
17. Garton, C. G.; Krasucki, Z. Proc. R. Soc. (London), Ser. A 1964, 280, 211-226.
18. In fact, the snap on of the capillary bridge should occur at a slightly larger distance when the liquid surfaces become unstable due to their mutual van der Waals attraction. However, this critical distance is of the order of a few nanometers and is not resolved in the present experiments.
19. Lyklema, J. Fundamentals of Interface and Colloid Science; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 2000.
20. The prefactor for the normalization arises naturally from eq 1 (The additional factor 2 in the denominator is due to the presence of two insulating layers in series.) and represents the ratio of electrical forces over capillary forces.
21. For 0.25 < U < 1, the contact angle upon rupture is well below 90° and the capillary bridge breaks symmetrically. For U < 0.25, θ is close to or even larger than 90°, In this case another instability mode dominates and the bridge ruptures asymmetrically, leaving a larger droplet on the bottom electrode. Apparently, this rupture mode or the competition between the two modes is affected by the electric field in a different way than the symmetric mode.
22. Vallet, M.; Vallade, M.; Berge, B. Eur. Phys. J. B 1999, 11, 583-591.
23. The applied voltage in this region is typically around 1 kV or beyond, which is well within the saturation regime of electrowetting. After the experiment, the contact angle at zero voltage is typically reduced below 90°, which is a clear indication of surface degradation.
24. Landau, L. D.; Lifschitz, E. W. Theoretische Physik Vol. VIII: Elektrodynamik der Kontinua; Akademie-Verlag: Berlin, 1976.
25. 1/6.
26. Additional field-induced effects are limited to a region of diameter δ around the contact line. For details, see: Buehrle, J.; Herminghaus, S.; Mugele, F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91, 086101.
27. Langbein, D. W. Capillary surfaces: shape-stability-dynamics, in particular under weightlessness; Springer: Berlin, New York, 2002.
28. Boucher, E. A. Rep. Prog. Phys. 1980, 43, 498-546.
29. In the case of asymmetric rupture, we always found the larger droplet on the bottom electrode. This symmetry breaking was the clearest manifestation of gravity throughout the experiments. We also note that gravity increases the range of contact angles that is dominated by the asymmetric instability mode.
30. Willett, C. D.; Adams, M. J. Langmuir 2000, 16, 9396-9405,
31. In the present experiments, we found that the pressure of the capillary bridges (as determined from the mean curvature) was always positive; that is, the bridges are unduloids. During spreading, the pressure increased roughly by a factor of 2.
32. Note that the free energy is only one particular choice for the functional to be minimized.
33. We neglected the minor contribution due to the insulating layers.