Fetal age assessment based on ultrasound head biometry and the effect of maternal and fetal factors

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 83, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 716-723

  Johnsen, Synnøve Lian ^a   Rasmussen, Svein ^a,b   Sollien, Rita ^a   Kiserud, Torvid ^a  

^a HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

Biometry; Fetal age; Gestational age; Pregnancy; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DETERMINATION; ARTICLE; BIPARIETAL DISTANCE; BREECH PRESENTATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; GENDER; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEAD; HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATERNAL AGE; MULTIPARA; NORMAL HUMAN; NORMAL VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOMETRY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEAD; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFERENCE VALUES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 4043171191     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00485.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Mongelli M, Wilcox M, Gardosi J. Estimating the date of confinement: ultrasonographic biometry versus certain menstrual dates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 278-81.
2. Nguyen TH, Larsen T, Engholm G, Moller H. Evaluation of ultrasound-estimated date of delivery in 17,450 spontaneous singleton births: do we need to modify Naegele's rule? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14: 23-8.
3. Tunon K, Eik-Nes SH, Grottum P. A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as predictors of the day of delivery in 15,000 examinations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 178-85.
4. Backe B. Routine ultrasonography in obstetric care in Norway, 1994. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1997; 117: 2314-15.
5. Campbell S. The prediction of fetal maturity by ultrasonic measurement of the biparietal diameter. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1969; 76: 603-9.
6. Altman DG, Chitty LS. New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 10: 174-91.
7. Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK. Fetal biparietal diameter: a critical re-evaluation of the relation to menstrual age by means of real-time ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 1982; 1: 97-104.
8. Persson PH, Grennert L, Gennser G, Gullberg B. Normal range curves for the intrauterine growth of the biparietal diameter. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 1978; 78: 15-20.
9. Hansmann M, Rackeløer BSA. Ultrasound Diagnosis in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1985.
10. Eik-Nes SH, Grøttum P, Jørgensen NP, Løkvik B. Normal range curves for BPD and MAD. Scan-Medical Drammen 1983.
11. Kiserud T, Rasmussen S. Assessment of gestational age using ultrasound - can the method be improved? Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1999; 119: 4331-4.
12. Jacobsen BK, Njolstad I, Thune I, Wilsgaard T, Lochen ML, Schirmer H. Increase in weight in all birth cohorts in a general population. The Tromso Study, 1974-1994. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 466-72.
13. Skjaerven R, Gjessing HK, Bakketeig LS. Birthweight by gestational age in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79: 440-449.
14. Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Births in selected weight groups. Annual report, 2000.
15. Altman DG, Chitty LS. Charts of fetal size: 1. Methodology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 29-34.
16. Royston P, Wright EM. How to construct 'normal ranges' for fetal variables. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 11: 30-8.
17. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error. Br Med J 1996; 312: 1654.
18. Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK. Fetal head circumference: relation to menstrual age. Am J Roentgenol 1982; 138: 649-53.
19. Eriksson KM, Haug K, Salvesen KA, Nesheim BI, Nylander G, Rasmussen S et al. Smoking habits among pregnant women in Norway 1994-1995. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 77: 159-64.
20. Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Maternal smoking habits at onset of pregnancy. Annual report, 2000.
21. Tunon K, Eik-Nes SH, Grottum P. The impact of fetal, maternal and external factors on prediction of the day of delivery by the use of ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 11: 99-103.
22. Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Carpenter RJ, Park SK. Estimating fetal age: effect of head shape on BPD. Am J Roentgenol 1981; 137: 83-5.
23. Kasby CB, Poll V. The breech head and its ultrasound significance. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982; 89: 106-10.
24. Gardosi J. Dating of pregnancy: time to forget the last menstrual period. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9: 367-8.
25. Gardosi J, Geirsson RT. Routine ultrasound is the method of choice for dating pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 933-6.
26. Campbell S, Warsof SL, Little D, Cooper DJ. Routine ultrasound screening for the prediction of gestational age. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65: 613-20.
27. Geirsson RT, Busby-Earle RM. Certain dates may not provide a reliable estimate of gestational age. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 108-9.
28. Kieler H, Axelsson O, Nilsson S, Waldenstrom U. The length of human pregnancy as calculated by ultrasonographic measurement of the fetal biparietal diameter. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 6: 353-7.
29. Saito M, Yazawa K, Hashiguchi A, Kumasaka T, Nishi N, Kato K. Time of ovulation and prolonged pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972; 112: 31-8.
30. Walker EM, Lewis M, Cooper W, Marnie M, Howie PW. Occult biochemical pregnancy: fact or fiction? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95: 659-63.
31. Smith GCS, Smith MFS, McNay MB, Fleming JEE. First-trimester growth and the risk of low birth weight. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1817-22.
32. Henriksen TB, Wilcox AJ, Hedegaard M, Secher NJ. Bias in studies of preterm and postterm delivery due to ultrasound assessment of gestational age. Epidemiology 1995; 6: 533-7.
33. Larsen T, Nguyen TH, Greisen G, Engholm G, Moller H. Does a discrepancy between gestational age determined by biparietal diameter and last menstrual period sometimes signify early intrauterine growth retardation? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 107: 238-44.
34. Nakling J, Backe B. Adverse obstetric outcome in fetuses that are smaller than expected at second trimester routine ultrasound examination. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002; 81: 846-51.