Gestational age assessment using ultrasound biometry - An evaluation of the second trimester scan;Terminbestemmelse ved hjelp av ultralyd kan metoden bli bedre?

Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening

Volumn 119, Issue 29, 1999, Pages 4331-4334

  Kiserud, T ^a   Rasmussen, S ^a  

^a HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NORWAY; PREGNANCY; PROGNOSIS; REFERENCE VALUE; SECOND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; STANDARD;

CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; NORWAY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, SECOND; PROGNOSIS; REFERENCE VALUES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 0033619566     PISSN: 00292001     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Backe B. Rutinemessige ultralydundersøkelser i svangerskapsomsorgen i Norge, 1994. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 1997; 117: 2314-5.
2. Bruk av ultralyd i svangerskapet. Konsensuskonferansen 27-29/8 1986. NIS-rapport. 1986; nr. 8. Trondheim: Norsk institutt for sykehusforskning, 1986.
3. Campbell S, Warsof SL, Little D, Cooper DJ. Routine ultrasound screening for the prediction of gestalional age. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65: 613-20.
4. Rasmussen S, Dalaker K, Berge LN, Lundgren R, Løvsett K. One-stage ultrasound in pregnancy: an evaluation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1990; 69: 581-8.
5. Geirsson RT. Ultrasound instead of last menstrual period as the basis of gestational age assignment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1991; 1: 212-9.
6. Mongelli M, Wilcox M, Gardosi J. Estimating the date of confinement: ultrasonographic biometry versus certain menstrual dates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 278-81.
7. Kieler H, Axelsson O, Nilsson S, Waldenström U. The length of human pregnancy as calculated by ultrasonographic measurement of the fetal biparietal diameter. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 6: 353-7.
8. Tunón K, Eik-Nes SH, Grøttum P. A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as predictor of the day of delivery in 15 000 examinations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 178-85.
9. Altman DG, Chitty LS. New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 10: 174-91.
10. Eik-Nes SH, Grøttum P. Graviditetskalenderen Snurra. Drammen: Scan-Med A/S, 1983.
11. Roth S. Small-for-gestational-age infants and antenatal prediction of outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 149-51.
12. Smith GCS, Smith MFS, McNay MB, Fleming JEE. Firsttrimester growth and risk of low birth weight. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1817-22.
13. Bakketeig LS, Hoffman HJ, Jacobsen G, Hagen JA, Storvik BE. Intrauterine growth pattern by the tendency to repeat small-for-gestationalage births in successive pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol 1997; 76 (suppl 165): 3-7.
14. Owen P, Donnet L, Ogston S, Christie AD, Patel N, Howie PW. Standards for ultrasound fetal growth velocity. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 60-9.
15. Backe B, Nakling J. Term prediction in routine ultrasound practice. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994; 73: 113-8.
16. Tunón K, Eik-Nes SH, Grøttum P. The impact of fetal, maternal and external factors on prediction of delivery by the use of ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 11: 99-103.