Markov models with random effects for binary panel data

MPR-online

Volumn 7, Issue , 2002, Pages 19-32

  Böckenholt, Ulf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Binary responses; Latent states; Mixed and latent Markov models

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043156901     PISSN: 14328534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aptech Systems (2000). GAUSS System and Graphics Manual. Version 3.5, Kent: Aptech Systems Inc.
2. Böckenholt, U. (1999). Measuring change: Mixed Markov models for ordinal panel data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 52, 125-136.
3. Böckenholt, U. (2001a). Mixed-effects analyses of rank-ordered data. Psychometrika, 66, 45-62.
4. Böckenholt, U. (2001b). Psychometrics: Preference models with latent variables. Smelser, N. J. & Baltes, P. B. (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 17 (pp. 11965-11969). Elsevier Science Ltd.
5. Böckenholt, U. & Langeheine, R. (1996). Latent change in recurrent choice data. Psychometrika, 61, 2, 285-301.
6. Coleman, J. S. (1964). Models of Change and Response Uncertainty. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
7. Eid, M. & Langeheine, R. (1999). Measuring consistency and occasion specificity with latent class models: A new model and its application to the measurement of affect. Psychological Methods, 4, 100-116.
8. Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Menard, S. (1989). Multiple Problem Youth: Delinquency, Substance Use, and Mental Health Problems. New York: Springer-Verlag.
9. Goulias, G. K. (1999). Longitudinal analysis of activity and travel pattern dynamics using generalized mixed Markov latent class models. Transportation Research Part B 33, 535-557.
10. Heinen, T. (1996), Latent Class and Discrete Latent Trait Models: Similarities and Differences, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Humphreys, K. (1998). The latent Markov chain with multivariate random effects. Sociological Methods and Research, 26, 269-299.
12. Kim, J.-S., & Böckenholt, U. (2000). Modeling stage-sequential change in ordered categorical responses. Psychological Methods, 5, 380-400.
13. Kuehn, A. A. (1962). Consumer brand choice - A learning process. In R. E. Frank et al. (Eds.), Quantitative Techniques in Marketing Analysis (pp. 390-403). Home wood: Irwin.
14. Langeheine, R. (1988). New developments in latent class theory. In R. Langeheine & J. Rost (Eds.), Latent Trait and Latent Class Models (pp. 77-108). New York: Plenum.
15. Langeheine, R. (1994). Latent variables Markov models. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clog (Eds.), Latent Variables Analysis: Applications for Developmental Research (pp. 373-395). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
16. Langeheine, R., Stern, E., & van de Pol, F. (1994). State mastery learning: dynamic models for longitudinal data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 3, 277-291.
17. Langeheine, R. & van de Pol, F. (1990). A unifying framework for Markov modeling in discrete space and discrete time. Sociological Methods and Research, 18, 416-441.
18. Langeheine, R. & van de Pol, F. (1994). Discrete-time mixed Markov latent class models. In A. Dale & R. B. Davies (Eds.), Analyzing Social and Political Change: A Casebook of Methods (pp. 170-197). London: Sage.
19. Langeheine, R. & van de Pol, F. (2000). Fitting higher order Markov chains. Methods of Psychological Research, 5, 32-55 (http://www.hsp.de/MPR).
20. Manski C & McFadden D (Eds.) 1981 Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications. MIT Press, Cambridge.
21. Meiser, T. & Ohrt, B. (1996). Modeling structure and chance in transitions: Mixed latent partial Markov-chain Models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21, 91-109.
22. Raudenbush, S. W. & Bryk, A. S. (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models. Newbury Park: Sage Publ.
23. Regenwetter, M., Falmagne, J.-C., & Grofman, B. (1999). A stochastic model of preference change and its application to 1992 Presidential Election Panel data. Psychological Review, 106, 362-384.
24. Rost, J. (1988). Quantitative und qualitative Testheorie [Quantitative and Qualitative Probabilistic Test Theory]. Bern: Huber.
25. Rost, J. (1997). Logistic mixture models. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory (pp. 449-464). New York: Springer-Verlag.
26. Rost, J., & Langeheine, R. (Eds.) (1997). Applications of Latent Trait and Latent Class Models in the Social Sciences. Münster: Waxman.
27. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-466.
28. Snijders, A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel Analyses: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publ.
29. Stroud, A. H., & Secrest, D. (1966). Gaussian Quadrature Formulas. New York: Prentice Hall.
30. Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273-286.
31. Van de Pol, F., & Langeheine, R. (1994). Mixed Markov latent class models. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1990 (pp. 213-247). Oxford: Blackwell.
32. Vermunt, J. K., Langeheine, R., & Böckenholt, U. (1999). Discrete-time discrete-state latent Markov models with time-constant and time-varying covariates. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 197-207.
33. Wiggins, L. M. (1973). Panel Analysis: Latent Probability Models for Attitude and Behavior Processes. Amsterdam: Elsevier.