Mixed-effects analyses of rank-ordered data

Psychometrika

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 45-62

  Böckenholt, Ulf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Latent class analysis; Latent trait models; Luce's choice model; Nominal categories model; Probabilistic choice models

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035532056     PISSN: 00333123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02295731     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Allison, P.D., & Christakis, N.A. (1994). Logit models for sets of ranked items. In P. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological Methodology, 1994 (pp. 199-228). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Alwin, D.F. (1990). Historical changes in parental orientations to children. Sociological Studies of Child Development, 3, 65-86.
3. Alwin, D.F., & Jackson, D.J. (1982). The statistical analysis of Kohn's measures of parental values. In K.G. Jöreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observations: Causality, structure, and prediction (pp. 197-223). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
4. Beggs, S.S., Cardell, S., & Hausman, J. (1981). Assessing the potential demand for electric cars. Journal of Econometrics, 16, 1-19.
5. Ben-Akiva, M., & Lerman, S. (1985). Discrete choice analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
6. Ben-Akiva, M., Morikawa, T., & Shiroishi, F. (1992). Analysis of the reliability of preference ranking data. Journal of Business Research, 24, 149-164.
7. Bock, R.D. (1972). Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories. Psychometrika, 37, 29-51.
8. Bock, R.D. & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: An application of the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 443-459.
9. Böckenholt, U. (1992). Thurstonian representation for partial ranki ng data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 31-49.
10. Böckenholt, U. (1993). Applications of Thurstonian models to ranking data. In M. Fligner & J. Verducci (Eds.), Probability models and statistical analyses for ranking data (157-172). New York: Springer.
11. Chan, W., & Bentler, P.M. (1998). Covariance structure analysis of ordinal ipsative data. Psychometrika, 63, 369-399.
12. Chapman, R. & Staelin, R. (1982). Exploiting rank ordered choice set data within the stochastic utility model. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 288-301.
13. Critchlow, D.E. & Fligner, M.A. (1993). Ranking models with item covariates. In M. Fligner & J. Verducci (Eds.), Probability models and statistical analyses for ranking data (1-19). New York: Springer.
14. Critchlow, D.E., Fligner, M., & Verducci, J. (1991). Probability models in rankings. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 35, 294-318.
15. Croon, M.A. (1989). The analysis of partial rankings by log-linear and latent class model. In G. DeSoete, H. Feger, & K.C. Klauer (Eds.), New developments in psychological choice modeling (pp. 497-506). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
16. Dayton, C.M., & MacReady, G.B. (1988). Concomitant variable latent class models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 173-178.
17. Gill, P.E., Murray, W., & Wright, M.H. (1981). Practical optimization. New York: Academic Press.
18. Goodman, L. (1979). Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 537-552.
19. Hausman, J.A., & Ruud, P.A. (1987). Specifying and testing econometric models for rank-ordered data. Journal of Econometric, 34, 83-104.
20. Hedeker, D. (1999). MIXNO: A computer program for mixed-effects nominal logistic regression. Journal of Statistical Software, 4, 1-92.
21. Hedeker, D., & Gibbons, R. (1994). A random-effects ordinal regression model for multilevel data. Biometrics, 50, 933-944.
22. Hojo, H. (1997). A marginalization model for the multidimensional unfolding analysis of ranking data. Japanese Psychological Research, 39, 33-42.
23. Kamakura, W.A., & Mazzon, J.A. (1991). Value segmentation?: A model for the measurement of values and value systems. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 208-218.
24. Kamakura, W.A., Wedel, M., & Agrawal, J. (1994). Concomitant variable latent class models for conjoint analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11, 451-464.
25. Kerckhoff, A.C. (1972). Socialization and social class. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26. Kohn, M. (1969). Class and conformity: A study in values. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
27. Kohn, M. (1976). Social class and parental values: Another confirmation of the relationship. American Sociological Review, 41, 538-545.
28. Kohn, M.L., & Slomczynski, K.M. (1990). Social structure and self-direction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
29. Luce, R.D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley.
30. Lynd, R., & Lynd, H. (1929). Middletown: A study in contemporary American culture. New York: Harcourt Brace.
31. Marden, J.I. (1995). Analyzing and modeling rank data. London: Chapman & Hall.
32. Maydeu-Olivares, A. (1999). Thurstonian modeling of ranking data via mean and covariance structure analysis. Psychometrika, 64, 325-340.
33. McCullagh, P. (1993). Permutations and regression models. In M. Fligner & J. Verducci (Eds.), Probability models and statistical analyses for ranking data (pp. 196-215). New York: Springer.
34. McCullagh, P., & Neider, J.A. (1989). Generalized linear models. London: Chapman & Hall.
35. National Opinion Research Center (1987). General social surveys, 1972-1987: Cumulative codebook. Chicago: Author.
36. Plackett, R.L. (1975). The analysis of permutations. Applied Statistics, 24, 193-202.
37. Samejima, F. (1972). A general models for free-response data. Psychometric Monograph, No. 18.
38. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimensions of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
39. Silverberg, A.R. (1984, August). Statistical models for q-permutations. Proceedings of the Biopharmaceutical Section, American Statistical Association, 107-112.
40. Stern, H. (1990). Models for distributions on permutations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 558-564.
41. Stroud, A.H., & Secrest, D. (1966). Gaussian quadrature formulas. New York: Prentice Hall.
42. Takane, Y. (1987). Analysis of contingency tables by ideal point discriminant analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 493-513.
43. Takane, Y. (1996). Choice model analysis of the "pick any/n" type of binary data. Japanese Psychological Research, 40, 31-39.
44. Takane, Y., & Carroll, J.D. (1981). Nonmetric maximum likelihood multidimensional scaling from directional rankings of similarities. Psychometrika, 46, 389-405.
45. Takane, Y. & de Leeuw, J. (1987). On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables. Psychometrika, 52, 393-408.
46. Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273-286.
47. Thurstone, L. L. (1931). Rank order as a psychophysical method. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 187-201.
48. Yao, G., & Böckenholt, U. (1999). Bayesian estimation of Thurstonian ranking models based on the Gibbs sampler. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 52, 79-92.
49. Train, K. (1986). Qualitative choice analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
50. Tversky, A., & Russo, J. E. (1969). Substitutability and similarity in binary choices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6, 1-12.
51. Wright, J.D., & Wright, S.A. (1976). Social class and parental values for children: A partial replication and extension of the Kohn thesis. American Sociological Review, 41, 527-537.