Kinesthetic estimation of the main orientations from the upright and supine positions

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 117, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 13-28

  Lejeune, Laure ^a   Thouvarecq, Régis ^b   Anderson, David I ^c   Jouen, Francois ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROUEN   (France)

^c SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Body orientation; Kinesthetic adjustments; Subjective vertical; Z axis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; KINESTHESIA; MALE; ORIENTATION; REFERENCE VALUE; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; SUPINE POSITION; TILT TABLE TEST; VISION;

ADULT; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; KINESTHESIS; MALE; ORIENTATION; POSTURE; REFERENCE VALUES; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; SUPINE POSITION; TILT-TABLE TEST; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 4043142954     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Asch S.E. Witkin H.A. Studies in space orientation: I. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 1948 325-337
2. Asch S.E. Witkin H.A. Studies in space orientation: II. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 1948 455-477
3. Bauermeister M. Differences between right versus left lateral body tilt in its effect on the visual and tactual perception of verticality Psychological Research 40 1978 183-187
4. Bauermeister M. Perception of the visual horizontal during lateral body tilt: Right-left asymmetries Perceptual and Motor Skills 47 1978 715-720
5. Bauermeister M. Werner H. Wapner S. The effect of body tilt on tactual-kinesthetic perception of verticality American Journal of Psychology 77 1964 451-456
6. Bisdorff A.R. Wolsley C.J. Anastasopoulos D. Bronstein A.M. Gresty M.A. The perception of body verticality (subjective postural vertical) in peripheral and central vestibular disorders Brain 119 Pt 5 1996 1523-1534
7. Bronstein A.M. The interaction of otolith and proprioceptive information in the perception of verticality. The effects of labyrinthine and CNS disease Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 871 1999 324-333
8. Fisk J.D. Goodale M.A. The organization of eye and limb movements during unrestricted reaching to targets in contralateral and ipsilateral visual space Experimental Brain Research 60 1 1985 159-178
9. Gentilucci M. Negrotti A. Mechanisms for distance reproduction in perceptual and motor tasks Experimental Brain Research 108 1 1996 140-146
10. Guerraz M. Luyat M. Poquin D. Ohlmann T. The role of neck afferents in subjective orientation in the visual and tactile sensory modalities Acta Otolaryngologica 120 2000 735-738
11. Howard I.P. Templeton W.B. Human spatial orientation 1966 John Wiley New York
12. Luyat M. Verticale subjective versus verticale posturale: Une note sur l'étude de la perception de la verticale L'Année Psychologique 97 1997 433-447
13. Luyat M. Gentaz E. Corte T.R. Guerraz M. Reference frames and haptic perception of orientation: Body and head tilt effects on the oblique effect Perception & Psychophysics 63 3 2001 541-554
14. Luyat M. Ohlmann T. Barraud P.A. Subjective vertical and postural activity Acta Psychologica 95 2 1997 181-193
15. Luyat M. Poquin D. Isableu B. Ohlmann T. Crémieux J. Existe-t-il des processus communs impliqués dans l'estimation de la verticalité et dans le contrô le de la posture? In: Lacour M. (Eds.) Posture et equilibre. Entrées sensorielles, méthodes d'exploration et applications 1999 55-72 Sauramps Médical Montpellier
16. Mann C.W. Berthelot-Berry N.H. Dauterive H.J. The perception of the vertical: I. Visual and non-labyrinthine cues Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 1949 538-547
17. Marendaz C. Nature and dynamics of reference frames in visual search for orientation: Implications for early visual processing Psychological Science 9 1 1998 27-32
18. Mars F. Popov K. Vercher J.L. Supramodal effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation on the subjective vertical Neuroreport 12 13 2001 2991-2994
19. McCloskey D.I. Kinesthetic sensibility Physiological Reviews 58 4 1978 763-820
20. Medendorp W.P. Van Asselt S. Gielen C.C. Pointing to remembered visual targets after active one-step self-displacements within reaching space Experimental Brain Research 125 1 1999 50-60
21. Mittelstaedt H. A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical Naturwissenschaften 70 6 1983 272-281
22. Mittelstaedt H. The subjective vertical as a function of visual and extraretinal cues Acta Psychologica 63 1-3 1986 63-85
23. Mittelstaedt H. The role of the otoliths in the perception of the orientation of self and world to the vertical Zool. Jb. Physiol. 95 1991 419-425
24. Mittelstaedt H. The formation of the visual and the postural vertical Mergner In: F.T. Hlavacka (Eds.) Multisensory control of posture 1995 147-155 Plenum Press New York
25. Mittelstaedt H. Origin and processing of postural information Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 22 4 1998 473-478
26. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness. The Edinburgh inventory Neuropsychologica 9 1971 97-113
27. Pagano C.C. Turvey M.T. Eigenvectors of the inertia tensor and perceiving the orientation of a hand-held object by dynamic touch Perception & Psychophysics 52 6 1992 617-624
28. Pagano C.C. Turvey M.T. The inertia tensor as a basis for the perception of limb orientation Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 5 1995 1070-1087
29. Parker D.E. Poston R.L. Tilt from head-inverted position produces displacement of visual subjective verticale in the opposite direction Perception & Psychophysics 36 1984 461-465
30. Prablanc C. Pelisson D. Goodale M.A. Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. I. Role of retinal feedback of target position in guiding the hand Experimental Brain Research 62 2 1986 293-302
31. Roll J.P. Sensibilités cutanées et musculaires In: Richelle M. Requin J. Roberts M. (Eds.) Traité de psychologie expérimentale 1 1994 483-542 Presses Universitaires de France Paris
32. Schmidt R.A. Lee T.D. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis 3rd ed. 1999 Human Kinetics Windsor
33. Soechting J.F. Flanders M. Sensorimotor representations for pointing to targets in three-dimensional space Journal of Neurophysiology 62 2 1989 582-594
34. Soechting J.F. Flanders M. Errors in pointing are due to approximations in sensorimotor transformations Journal of Neurophysiology 62 2 1989 595-608
35. Spidalieri G. Sgolastra R. Psychophysical properties of the trunk midline Journal of Neurophysiology 78 1 1997 545-549
36. Stoffregen T.A. Bardy B.G. On specification and the senses Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 2001 195-261
37. Stoffregen T.A. Riccio G.E. An ecological theory of orientation and the vestibular system Psychological Review 95 1 1988 3-14
38. Templeton W.B. The role of gravitational cues in the judgment of visual orientation Perception & Psychophysics 14 3 1973 451-457
39. Wade N.J. Visual orientation during lateral head tilt when upright and supine Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 22 1970 420-422
40. Wade N.J. The representation of orientation in vision Australian Journal of Psychology 44 1992 139-145
41. Wade S.W. Curthoys I.S. The effect of ocular torsional position on perception of the roll-tilt of visual stimuli Vision Research 37 8 1997 1071-1078
42. Witkin H.A. Asch S.E. Studies in space orientation: III. Perception of the upright in the absence of a visual field Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 1948 603-613
43. Wolpert D.M. Ghahramani Z. Jordan M.I. Perceptual distortion contributes to the curvature of human reaching movements Experimental Brain Research 98 1 1994 153-156
44. Wright W.G. Glasauer S. Haptic subjective vertical shows context dependence: Task and vision play a role during dynamic tilt stimulation Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1004 2003 531-535