Incidental and intentional encoding in young and elderly adults

NeuroReport

Volumn 15, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 1819-1823

  Téllez Alanís, Bernarda ^a,b   Cansino, Selene ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DEL ESTADO DE MORELOS   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Aged; Encoding; Event related potentials; Incidental; Intentional; Subsequent memory effects; Young

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECORDING; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORD RECOGNITION;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 4043136015     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000137075.41257.98     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ligh LL. Memory and aging. In: Bjork EL, Bjork RA (eds). Memory. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996, pp. 443-490.
2. Hashtroudi S, Parker ES, Luis JD and Reisen CA. Generation and elaboration in older adults. Exp Aging Res 1989; 15:73-78.
3. Rankin JL and Collins M. Adult age differences in memory elaboration. J Gerontol 1985; 40:451-458.
4. Albert MS. Normal and abnormal memory. Aging and Alzheimer's disease. In: Wang E and Snyder DS (eds). Handbook of the Aging Brain. San Diego: Academic Press; 1998, pp. 1-17.
5. Noldy NE, Stelmack RM and Campbell KB. Event-related potentials and recognition memory for pictures and words: the effects of intentional and incidental learning. Psychophysiology 1990; 27:417-428.
6. Ferrara RA, Puff CR, Gioia GA and Richards JM. Effects of incidental and intentional learning instructions on the free recall of naturalistic sounds. Bull Psychon Soc 1978; 11:353-355.
7. Mitchell DB. How many memory systems? Evidence from aging. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1989; 15:31-49.
8. Ligh LL and Singh A. Implicit and explicit memory and young and older adults. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1987; 13:531-541.
9. Crook THIII, Larrabe GJ and Youngjohn JR. Age and incidental recall for a simulated everyday memory task. J Gerontol 1993; 48:45-47.
10. Sanquist TF, Rohrbaugh JW, Syndulko K and Lindsey DB. Electrocortical signs of levels of processing: perceptual analysis and recognition memory. Psychophysiology 1980; 17:568-576.
11. Van Petten C and Senkfor AJ. Memory for words and novel visual patterns: repetition, recognition, and encoding effects in the event-related brain potential. Psychophysiology 1996; 33:491-506.
12. Karis D, Fabiani M and Donchin E. P300 and memory: individual differences in the Von Restorff effect. Cogn Psychol 1984; 16:177-216.
13. Fabiani M, Karis D and Donchin E. Effects of mnemonic strategy manipulation in a Von Restorff paradigm. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990; 75:22-35.
14. Rugg M. Event-related potentials studies of human memory. In: Gazzaniga MS (ed.) The Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge: MIT; 1995; pp. 789-801.
15. Friedman D, Ritter W and Snodgrass JG. ERPs during study as a function of subsequent direct and indirect memory testing in young and old adults. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 1996; 4:1-13.
16. Friedman D and Trott Ch. An event-related potential study of encoding in young and older adults. Neuropsychologia 2000; 38:542-557.
17. Weschler D. WAIS Español. Escala de Inteligencia para Adultos. México: Manual Moderno, 1981.
18. Folstein M, Folstein S and McHugh P. Minimental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12:189-198.
19. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J and Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961; 4:561-571.
20. Alameda JR and Cuetos F. Diccionario de Frecuencia de las Unidades Lingüísticas del Castellano. Oviedo: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo, 1995.
21. Kutas M and Iragui V. The N400 in a semantic categorization task across 6 decades. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998; 108:456-471.
22. Cansino S and Téllez-Alanís B. ERPs elicited by a cognitive incongruity paradigm: a semantic memory study. Neuroreport 2000; 11:977-981.
23. Morcom AM, Good CD, Frackowiak RSJ and Rugg MD. Age effects on the neural correlates of successful memory encoding. Brain 2003; 126:213-229.
24. Smith ME. Neurophysiological manifestations of recollective experience during recognition memory judgments. J Cogn Neurosci 1993; 5:1-13.
25. Paller KA. Recall and stem completion priming have different electrophysiological correlates and are modified diferentially by directed forgetting. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1990; 16:1021-1032.