Special education tribunals in Ontario

International Journal of Special Education

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 18-30

  Valeo, Angela ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043106158     PISSN: 08273383     EISSN: 19177844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Bertken, K. A. (1981). Due process hearings in special education: Who benefits (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1981). Dissertation Abstracts International, 42-05A, 1863.
2. Bill 82, An Act To Amend The Education Act, 1974, Government of Ontario (1980).
3. Dolmage v. The Muskoka Board of Education, Ontario Special Education (English) Tribunal, Ministry of Education. Toronto, ON, Canada (1984).
4. Eaton v. The Brant County Board of Education, Ontario Special Education (English) Tribunal, Ministry of Education. Toronto, ON, Canada (1993).
5. Education Act, R. S. O. Government of Ontario (1990).
6. Eubank, S. M. (1984). An analysis of special education due process hearings in Texas from September 1, 1977, to September 1, 1983: Implications for educational administration (Doctoral dissertation, East Texas State University, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45-08A, 2326.
7. Handley, M. F. (1998). The price parents paid: A qualitative study of parents who challenged the special education system (Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60-04A, 1079.
8. Hardin, A. M. (1983). School discipline: Statutory and case law pertinent to suspension and expulsion of handicapped students (Doctoral dissertation, Auburn University, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts International, 44-07A, 2114.
9. Hehir, T. F. (1990). The impact of due process on the programmatic decisions of special education directors (Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51-06A, 1984.
10. Howard, L. G. (1991). Incidence, outcomes, and fairness: An analysis of special education due process in Georgia (Doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52-05A, 1709.
11. Jackson, J. C. (1988). A descriptive study of special education due process hearings in the district of Columbia, 1979-1984 (Washington DC) (Doctoral dissertation, The George Washington University, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International, 50-02A, 411.
12. Kavelman v. The Waterloo County Board of Education, Ontario Special (English) Education Tribunal, Ministry of Education. Toronto, ON, Canada (1985).
13. Kenworthy, J., & Whittaker, J. (2000). Anything to declare? The struggle for inclusive education and children's rights. Disability & Society, 15(2), 219-231.
14. Kyle, C. E. (1985). A descriptive analysis of special education due process hearings held in the state of Michigan between October 1, 1977, and December 31, 1980 (Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46-05A, 1249.
15. Labute v. The Board of Education for the City of Windsor, Ontario Special Education (English) Tribunal, Ministry of Education. Toronto, ON, Canada (1988).
16. Lewis v. The York Region Board of Education, Ontario Special Education (English) Tribunal, Ministry of Education. Toronto, ON, Canada (1985).
17. Liberty, L H. (1985). Analysis of special education due process hearings in Louisiana (Doctoral dissertation, The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46-06A, 1465.
18. Marshall, D. E. (1990). The education of exceptional children in the public schools of Ontario: A historical analysis, 1910 - 1982. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
19. Milne, C. (2001). Special education: A student's rights perspective. Paper presented at the Special Education Principles and Practices Conference, Osgoode Hall Professional Development Centre, Toronto, ON.
20. Ministry of Education. (2001). Special education: A guide for educators. Toronto, ON: Government of Ontario Printing Press.
21. O'Connor, R. L. (1989). An analysis of special education due process hearings in Pennsylvania (1977-1986) (Doctoral dissertation, Temple University, 1989). Dissertation Abstracts International, 50-04A, 922.
22. Penland, B. R. (1985). Maine special education due-process hearings: Perceptions of attitude and adherence to procedural safeguards by participants (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Alabama, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 47-03A, 866.
23. Romano, L. D. (1982). A study to evaluate the special education due process hearing requirements in Virginia (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1982). Dissertation Abstracts International, 44-02A, 463.
24. Rowett v. The Board of Education for the Region of York, Ontario Special Education (English) Tribunal, Ministry of Education. Toronto, ON, Canada (1986).
25. Sherman, R. R., & Webb, R. B. (1988). Qualitative research in education: Focus and methods. East Sussex, England: The Falmer Press.
26. Simpson, C. N. (1984). Parent perceptions of the special education due process hearing in Michigan, 1980 - 1981 (Conflict) (Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45-12A, 3613.
27. Special Educational Needs Tribunal. (1998-1999). Annual Report. Windsor House, London, England.
28. Statutory Powers and Procedures Act. (1997). In L. Claridge, Ontario Annual Practice, pp. 1-21. Aurora, Ontario, Canada: Canada Law Book Inc.
29. Stone v. The Board of Education for the City of Toronto, Ontario Special Education (English) Tribunal, Ministry of Education. Toronto, ON, Canada (1985).
30. Stutt v. The Carleton Board of Education, Ontario Special Education (English) Tribunal, Ministry of Education. Toronto, ON, Canada (1993).
31. Tarola, R. J. (1991). The relationship between selected characteristics of special education due process hearings, their outcomes, and the outcomes of subsequent appeals (Doctoral dissertation, Lehigh University, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52-05A, 1604.
32. Webb, P. J. (1994). An analysis of Texas special education due process hearings from September 1, 1983, to September 1, 1992: Implications for the administration of special education programs (Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International, 55-10A, 3062.
33. Wolf, N. E. (1983). Due process and least restrictive environment: An analysis of special education due process hearings in California (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts International, 43-12A, 3877.
34. Yell, M. L. (1998). The Law and Special Education. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458: Prentice-Hall Inc.