Videos have a role in postgraduate necropsy education

Journal of Clinical Pathology

Volumn 57, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 877-881

  Burton, J L ^a   Diercks O'Brien, G ^b   Rutty, G N ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c LEICESTER ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOPSY; EVISCERATION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION; POSTHUMOUS CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; VIDEORECORDING;

AUTOPSY; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; HUMANS; PATHOLOGY, CLINICAL; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 4043105498     PISSN: 00219746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2003.010637     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. DeRoy AK. The autopsy as a teaching-learning tool for medical undergraduates. J Med Educ 1976;51:1016-18.
2. Hartmann WH. Contributions of the autopsy to medical education. J Clin Pathol 1978;69:228-9.
3. Smith JC. Utilizing the autopsy for medical education. J Med Educ 1978;53:435-6.
4. Berthrong M. The autopsy as a vehicle for the lifetime education of pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1984;108:506-9.
5. Goudie RB, Harris P, Patterson W. How do we teach pathology? Post-mortems by video. J Pathol 1988;154:195-7.
6. Benbow EW. Why show autopsies to medical students. J Pathol 1990;162:187-8.
7. Hill RB, Anderson RE. The uses and value of autopsy in medical education as seen by pathology educators. Acad Med 1991;66:97-100.
8. Burton JL, Wells M. The Alder Hey affair: implications for pathology practice. J Clin Pathol 2001;54:820-3.
9. Burton JL, Rutty GN. The autopsy. 2000. Sheffield: The University of Sheffield Learning Media Unit.
10. Burton JL, McDonald S. Curriculum or syllabus: which are we reforming? Med Teach 2001;23:187-91.
11. Pope C, Zeibland S, Mays V. Qualitative research in health care: analysing qualitative data. BMJ 2000;320:114-16.
12. Underwood JCE. Autopsies and clinical audit. In: Burton JL, Rutty GN, eds. The hospital autopsy. London: Arnold, 2001:170-7.
13. Start RD, McCulloch TA, Benbow EW, et al. Clinical autopsy rates during the 1980s: the continued decline. J Pathol 1993;171:63-6.
14. Burton JL. The autopsy in modern undergraduate medical education: a qualitative study of uses and curriculum considerations. Med Educ 2003;37:1073-81.
15. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's doctors: Recommendations on undergraduate medical education. 2002. London: General Medical Council.
16. Walker JEC, Rutty GN, Rodgers B, et al. How should the chest wall be opened at necropsy? J Clin Pathol 2002;55:72-5.
17. Hunt NCA, James DS, Bull AD. The still video camera: a suitable and convenient method of demonstrating post mortem findings. Med Educ 1997;31:386-9.
18. Quentin-Baxter M, Dewhurst D. An interactive computer-based alternative to performing a rat dissection in the classroom. J Biol Educ 1992;26:27-33.
19. Guy JF, Frisby AJ. Using interactive videodiscs to teach gross anatomy to undergraduates at the Ohio State University. Acad Med 1992;67:132-3.
20. Gunn C, Maxwell L. CAL in human anatomy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 1996;12:205-15.
21. Zirkel JB, Zirkel PA. Technological alternatives to actual dissection in anatomy instruction: a review of the research. Educational Technology 1997;37:52-6.
22. Taylor SJ, Bogdon R. Introduction: Go to the people. In: Introduction to qualitative research methods: a guidebook and resource. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Inc, 1998:3-5.
23. Sparkes AC. The paradigms debate: an extended review and a celebration of difference. In: Sparkes AC, ed. Research in physical education and sport: exploring alternative visions. London: Falmer Press, 1992:9-60.