Mating systems and limits to seed production in two Dicerandra mints endemic to Florida scrub

Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 13, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 1819-1832

  Evans, Margaret E K ^a   Menges, Eric S ^b   Gordon, Doria R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b ARCHBOLD BIOLOGICAL STATION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dicerandra; Fire; Florida scrub; Inbreeding depression; Mating system; Pollinator limitation; Self incompatibility

Indexed keywords

ENDANGERED SPECIES; FLOWER VISITING; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY; SEED PRODUCTION; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

FLORIDA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA; DICERANDRA; DICERANDRA CHRISTMANII; DICERANDRA FRUTESCENS; INSECTA; LAMIACEAE; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; MENTHA;

EID: 4043079324     PISSN: 09603115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:BIOC.0000035869.12388.0f     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abrahamson W.G., Johnson A.F., Layne J.N. and Peroni P.A. 1984. Vegetation of the Archbold Biological Station, Florida: an example of the southern Lake Wales Ridge. Florida Scientist 47: 209-250.
2. Agren J. 1996. Population size, pollinator limitation, and seed set in the self-incompatible herb Lythrum salicaria. Ecology 77: 1779-1790.
3. Bierzychudek P. 1981. Pollinator limitation of plant reproductive effort. The American Naturalist 117: 838-840.
4. Bond W.J. 1994. Do mutualisms matter? Assessing the impact of pollinator and disperser disruption on plant extinction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 344: 83-90.
5. Bosch M. and Waser N.M. 1999. Effects of local density on pollination and reproduction in Delphinium nuttallianum and Aconitum columbianum (Ranunculaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 871-879.
6. Brown E. and Kephart S. 1999. Variability in pollen load: implications for reproduction and seedling vigor in a rare plant, Silene douglasii var. oraria. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160: 1145-1152.
7. Burd M. 1994. Bateman's Principle and plant reproduction - the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Botanical Review 60: 83-139.
8. Byers D.L. 1995. Pollen quantity and quality as explanations for low seed set in small populations exemplified by Eupatorium (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 82: 1000-1006.
9. Christman S.P. and Judd W.S. 1990. Notes on plants endemic to Florida scrub. Florida Scientist 53: 52-73.
10. DeMauro M.M. 1993. Relationship of breeding system to rarity in the lakeside daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var. glabra). Conservation Biology 7: 542-550.
11. Deyrup M.A. and Menges E.S. 1997. Pollination ecology of the rare scrub mint Dicerandra frutescens (Lamiaceae). Florida Scientist 60: 143-157.
12. Dobson A.P., Rodriguez J.P., Roberts W.M. and Wilcox D.S. 1997. Geographic distribution of endangered species in the United States. Science 275: 550-553.
13. Dudash M.R. and Fenster C.B. 1997. Multiyear study of pollen limitation and cost of reproduction in the iteroparous Silene virginica. Ecology 78: 484-493.
14. Evans M.E.K., Dolan R.W., Menges E.S. and Gordon D.R. 2000. Genetic diversity and reproductive biology in Warea carteri, a narrowly endemic Florida scrub annual. American Journal of Botany 87: 372-381.
15. Evans M.E.K., Menges E.S. and Gordon D.R. 2003. Reproductive biology of three sympatric endangered plants endemic to Florida scrub. Biological Conservation 111: 235-246.
16. Gaston K.J. and Kunin W.E. 1997. Rare-common differences: an overview. In: Kunin W.E. and Gaston K.J. (eds) The Biology of Rarity. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 12-29.
17. Groom M.J. 1998. Allee effects limit population viability of an annual plant. The American Naturalist 151: 487-496.
18. Huck R.B. 1987. Systematics and evolution of Dicerandra (Labiatae). Phanerogamarum monographiae tomus XIX.
19. Huck R.B. 2001. Two new intraspecific taxa in Florida Dicerandra (Labiatae). Novon 11: 417-420.
20. Huck R.B., Judd W.S., Whitten W.M., Skean J.D., Wunderlin R.P. and DeLaney K.R. 1989. A new Dicerandra (Labiatae) from the Lake Wales Ridge of Florida, with a cladistic analysis and discussion of endemism. Systematic Botany 14: 197-213.
21. Kaye T.N. 1999. From flowering to dispersal: reproductive ecology of an endemic plant, Astragalus australis var. olympicus (Fabaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 1248-1256.
22. Kruckeberg A.R. and Rabinowitz D. 1985. Biological aspects of endemism in higher plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16: 447-479.
23. Kunin W.E. 1993. Sex and the single mustard: population density and pollinator behavior effects on seed set. Ecology 74: 2145-2160.
24. Kunin W.E. 1997a. Population size and density effects in pollination: pollinator foraging and plant reproductive success in experimental arrays of Brassica kaber. Journal of Ecology 85: 225-234.
25. Kunin W.E. 1997b. Introduction: on the causes and consequences of rare-common differences. In: Kunin W.E. and Gaston K.J. (eds) The Biology of Rarity. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 3-11.
26. Lamont B.B., Klinkhamer P.G.L. and Witkowski E.T.F. 1993. Population fragmentation may reduce fertility to zero in Banksia goodii - a demonstration of the Allee effect. Oecologia 94: 446-450.
27. Larson B.M.H. and Barrett S.C.H. 1999. The ecology of pollen limitation in buzz-pollinated Rhexia virginica (Melastomataceae). Journal of Ecology 87: 371-381.
28. Larson B.M.H. and Barrett S.C.H. 2000. A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 69: 503-520.
29. Les D.H., Reinartz J.A. and Esselman E.J. 1991. Genetic consequences of rarity in Aster furcatus (Asteraceae), a threatened, self-incompatible plant. Evolution 45: 1641-1650.
30. Littell R.C., Milliken G.A., Stroup W.W. and Wolfinger R.D. 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
31. Mawdsley N.A., Compton S.G. and Whittaker R.J. 1998. Population persistence, pollination mutualisms, and figs in fragmented tropical landscapes. Conservation Biology 12: 1416-1420.
32. McCormick K.D., Deyrup M.A., Menges E.S., Wallace S.R., Meinwald J. and Eisner T. 1993. Relevance of chemistry to conservation of isolated populations: the case of volatile leaf components of Dicerandra mints. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 90: 7701-7705.
33. Menges E.S. 1992. Habitat preferences and response to disturbance for Dicerandra frutescens, a Lake Wales Ridge (Florida) endemic plant. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 119: 308-313.
34. Menges E.S. 1999. Ecology and conservation of Florida scrub. In: Anderson R.C., Fralish J.S. and Baskin J. (eds) The Savanna, Barren, and Rock Outcrop Communities of North America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 7-22.
35. Menges E.S., McIntyre P.J., Finer M.S., Gross E. and Yahr R. 1999. Microhabitat of the narrow Florida scrub endemic Dicerandra christmanii, with comparisons to its congener D. frutescens. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 126: 24-31.
36. Menges E.S., Dolan R.W., Yahr R. and Gordon D.R. 2001. Comparative genetics of seven plants endemic to Florida's Lake Wales Ridge. Castanea 66: 98-114.
37. Murray B.R., Thrall P.H., Gill A.M. and Nicotra A.B. 2002. How plant life-history and ecological traits relate to species rarity and commonness at varying spatial scales. Austral Ecology 27: 291-310.
38. Myers R.L. 1990. Scrub and high pine. In: Myers R.L. and Ewel J.J. (eds) Ecosystems of Florida. University of Central Florida Press, Orlando, Florida, pp. 150-193.
39. Oostermeijer J.G., Luijten S.H., Krenova Z.V. and den Nijs H.C.N. 1998. Relationships between population and habitat characteristics and reproduction of the rare Gentiana pneumonanthe L. Conservation Biology 12: 1042-1053.
40. Pavlik B.M., Ferguson N. and Nelson M. 1993. Assessing limitations on the growth of endangered plant populations, II. Seed production and seed bank dynamics of Erysimum capitatum ssp. angustatum and Oenothera deltiodes ssp. howellii. Biological Conservation 65: 267-278.
41. Peroni P.A. and Abrahamson W.G. 1985. A rapid method for determining losses of native vegetation. Natural Areas Journal 5: 20-24.
42. Ramsey M. and Vaughton G. 2000. Pollen quality limits seed set in Burchardia umbellata (Colchicaceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 845-852.
43. Robertson A.W., Kelly D., Ladley J.J. and Sparrow A.D. 1999. Effects of pollinator loss on endemic New Zealand mistletoes (Loranthaceae). Conservation Biology 13: 499-508.
44. Schemske D.W., Husband B.C., Ruckelhaus M.H., Goodwillie C., Parker I.M. and Bishop J.G. 1994. Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology 75: 584-606.
45. Spira T.P. 2001. Plant-pollinator interactions: a threatened mutualism with implications for the ecology and management of rare plants. Natural Areas Journal 21: 78-88.
46. Steiner K.E. and Whitehead V.B. 1996. The consequences of specialization for pollination in a rare South African shrub, Ixianthes retziodes (Scrophulariaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 201: 131-138.
47. Weekley C.W. and Race T. 2001. The breeding system of Zhiphus celata Judd and D.W. Hall (Rhamnaceae), a rare endemic of the Lake Wales Ridge, Florida, USA: implications for recovery. Biological Conservation 100: 207-213.
48. Wolf A.T. and Harrison S.P. 2001. Effects of habitat size and patch isolation on reproductive success of the serpentine morning glory. Conservation Biology 15: 111-121.
49. Zimmerman J.K. and Aide T.M. 1989. Patterns of fruit production in a neotropical orchid - pollinator vs. resource limitation. American Journal of Botany 76: 67-73.