How plant life-history and ecological traits relate to species rarity and commonness at varying spatial scales

Austral Ecology

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 291-310

  Murray, Brad R ^a,c   Thrall, Peter H ^a   Gill, A Malcolm ^a   Nicotra, Adrienne B ^b  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Abundance; Commonness; Distribution; Geographical range; Phenotypic plasticity; Rarity; Spatial scale; Threatened species

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; LIFE HISTORY; RARITY; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

EID: 10844245587     PISSN: 14429985     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2002.01181.x     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Aarssen L. W. (1988) 'Pecking order' of four plant species from pastures of different ages. Oikos 51, 3-12.
2. Aizen M. A. & Patterson W. A. (1990) Acorn size and geographical range in the North American oaks (Quercus L.). J. Biogeogr. 17, 327-32.
3. Anderson G. J. (1980) The status of the very rare Prunus gravesii Small. Rhodora 82, 113-29.
4. Austin M. P. (1998) An ecological perspective on biodiversity investigations: Examples from Australian eucalypt forests. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 85, 2-17.
5. Banks J. A. (1980) The reproductive biology of Erythronium propullans Gray and sympatric populations of E. albidum Nutt (Liliaceae). Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 107, 181-8.
6. Bell D L. & Sultan S. E. (1999) Dynamic phenotypic plasticity for root growth in Polygonum: A comparative study. Am. J. Bot. 86, 807-19.
7. Bevill R. L. & Louda S. M (1999) Comparisons of related rare and common species in the study of plant rarity. Conserv. Biol. 13, 493-8.
8. Bosch M., Simon J., Molero J. & Blanche C. (1998) Reproductive biology, genetic variation and conservation of the rare endemic dysploid Delphinium bolosii (Ranunculaceae). Biol. Conserv. 86, 57-66.
9. Brooker M I. H. & Kleinig D. A. (1983) Field Guide to Eucalypts, Vol. 1. Inkata Press, Sydney.
10. Brooker M. I. H. & Kleinig D. A. (1990) Field Guide to Eucalypts, Vol. 2. Inkala Press, Sydney.
11. Brooker M. I. H. & Kleinig D. A. (1994) Field Guide to Eucalypts, Vol. 3. Inkata Press, Sydney.
12. Brown J. H. (1995) Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
13. Bruun H. H. (2001) On the seed mass-regional abundance relationship: The Eriksson & Jakobsson (1998) model does not apply to Danish grasslands. J. Ecol. 89, 300-3
14. Byers D. L. & Meagher T. R. (1997) A comparison of demographic characteristics in a rare and a common species of Eupatorium. Ecol. Appl 7, 519-30.
15. Chazdon R. L. (1992) Photosynthetic plasticity of two rain forest shrubs across natural gap transects. Oecologia 92, 586-95.
16. Crawley M. J. (1993) GLIM for Ecologists. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
17. Duralia T. E. & Reader R. J. (1993) Does abundance reflect competitive ability? A field test with three prairie grasses. Oikos 68, 82-90.
18. Edwards W. (1996) Range size and rarity in plant lineages. PhD Thesis, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
19. Edwards W. & Westoby M. (1996) Reserve mass and dispersal investment in relation to geographic range of plant species: Phylogenetically independent contrasts. J. Biogeogr. 23, 329-38.
20. Edwards W. & Westoby M. (2000) Families with highest proportions of rare species are not consistent between floras. J. Biogeogr. 27, 733-40.
21. Erickson R. O. (1945) The Clematis fremontii var. riehlii population in the Ozarks. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 32, 413-60.
22. Eriksson O. & Jakobsson A. (1998) Abundance, distribution and life histories of grassland plants: A comparative study of 81 species. J. Ecol. 86, 922-33.
23. Fiedler P. L. (1987) Life history and population dynamics of rare and common mariposa lilies (Calochortus Pursh: Liliaceae). J. Ecol. 75, 1977-95.
24. Field C. B. (1988) On the role of photosynthetic responses in constraining the habitat distribution of rainforest plants. In: Ecology of Photosynthesis in Sun and Shade (eds J. R. Evans, S. von Caemmerer & W. W. I. Adams) pp. 343-58. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne.
25. Gaston K. J. (1994) Rarity. Chapman and Hall, London.
26. Gill A. M. (1975) Fire and the Australian flora: A review. Aust. For. 38, 4-25.
27. Gill A. M. & Bradstock R. A. (1995) Extinction of biota by fires. In: Conserving Biodiversity, Threats and Solutions (eds A. Bradstock, T. D. Auld, D. A. Keith, R T. Kingsford, D. Lunney & D. P. Sivertsen) pp. 309-22. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Sydney.
28. Gill A. M., Brooker M. I. H. & Moore P. H. R. (1992) Seed weights and numbers as a function of fruit size and subgenus in some Eucalyptus species from south-western Australia. Aust. J. Bot. 40, 103-11.
29. Greer G. K. & McCarthy B. C. (1999) Gametophytic plasticity among four species of ferns with contrasting ecological distributions. Int. J. Plant Sci. 160, 879-86.
30. Grubb P. J. (1986) Problems posed by sparse and patchily distributed species in species-rich plant communities. In: Community Ecology (eds J. Diamond & T. J. Case) pp. 207-25. Harper & Row, New York.
31. Guo Q., Brown J. H., Valone T. J & Kachman S. D. (2000) Constraints of seed size on plant distribution and abundance. Ecology 81, 2149-55.
32. Harper K T. (1979) Some reproductive and life history characteristics of rare plants and implications of management. Great Basin Nat. Mem. 3, 129-37.
33. Harvey P. H. & Rambaut A. (2000) Comparative analyses for adaptive radiations. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 355, 1599-605.
34. Hedderson T. A. (1992) Rarity at range limits: Dispersal capacity and habitat relationships of extraneous moss species in a boreal Canadian National Park. Biol. Conserv. 59, 113-20.
35. Hodgson J. G (1986a) Commonness and rarity in plants with special reference to the Sheffield Flora part I: The identity, distribution and habitat characteristics of the common and rare species. Biol. Conserv. 36, 199-252.
36. Hodgson J. G. (1986b) Commonness and rarity in plants with special reference to the Sheffield Flora part II: The relative importance of climate, soils and land use. Biol. Conserv. 36, 253-74.
37. Hodgson J. G. (1986c) Commonness and rarity in plants with special reference to the Sheffield Flora part III: Taxonomic and evolutionary aspects. Biol. Conserv. 36, 275-96
38. Hubbell S. P & Foster R. B. (1986) Commonness and rarity in a neotropical forest: Implications for tropical tree conservation. In: Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity (ed. M. E. Soul) pp. 205-31. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
39. Hughes L., Cawsey E. M. & Westoby M. (1996) Climatic range sizes of Eucalyptus species in relation to future climate change. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. Lett. 5, 23-9.
40. Jensen R. J. (1992) Acorn size redux. J. Biogeogr. 19, 573-9.
41. Karron J. D. (1987a) A comparison of levels of genetic polymorphism and self-compatibility in geographically restricted and widespread plant congeners. Evol. Ecol. 1, 47-58.
42. Karron J. D. (1987b) The pollination ecology of co-occurring geographically restricted and widespread species of Astragalus (Fabaceae). Biol. Conserv. 39, 179-93.
43. Keith D. A. (1998) An evaluation and modification of World Conservation Union Red List criteria for classification of extinction risk in vascular plants. Conserv. Biol. 12, 1076-90.
44. Keith D. A., Auld T. D., Ooi M. K. J. & Mackenzie B. R. D. (2000) Sensitivity analyses of decision rules in World Conservation Union (IUCN) Red List criteria using Australian plants. Biol. Conserv. 94, 311-19.
45. Kelly D. L., Tanner E. V. J., Lughadha E. M. N. & Kapos V. (1994) Floristics and biogeography of a rain forest in the Venezuelan Andes. J. Biogeogr. 21, 421-40.
46. Kelly C. K. & Woodward F. I. (1996) Ecological correlates of plant range size: Taxonomies and phylogenies in the study of plant commonness and rarity in Great Britain. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351, 1261-9.
47. Kunin W. E. & Gaston K. J. (1997) The Biology of Rarity: Causes and Consequences of Rare-Common Differences. Chapman & Hall, London.
48. Kunin W. E. & Shmida A. (1997) Plant reproductive traits as a function of local, regional, and global abundance. Conserv. Biol. 11, 183-92.
49. Lahti T., Kemppainen E., Kurtto A. & Uotila P. (1991) Distribution and biological characteristics of threatened vascular plants in Finland. Biol. Conserv. 55, 299-314.
50. Landa K. & Rabinowitz D. (1983) Relative preference of Arphia sulpkurea (Orthoptera: Acrididae) for sparse and common prairie grasses. Ecology 64, 392-5.
51. Leigh J. H. & Briggs J. D (1992) Threatened Australian Plants: Overview and Case Studies. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
52. Leishman M. R. & Murray B. R. (2001) The relationship between seed size and abundance in plant communities: Model predictions and observed patterns. Oikos 94, 151-61.
53. Longton R. E. (1992) Reproduction and rarity in British mosses. Biol. Conserv. 59, 89-98.
54. Meagher T. R , Antonovics J. & Primack R. (1978) Experimental ecological genetics in Plantago. III. Genetic variation and demography in relation to survival of Plantago cordata, a rare species Biol. Conserv. 14, 243-57.
55. Mehrhoff L. A. (1983) Pollination in the genus Isotria (Orchidaceae). Am. J. Bot. 70, 1444-53.
56. Miller T. E. & Werner P. A. (1987) Competitive effects and responses between plant species in a first-year old-field community. Ecology 68, 1201-10
57. Mitchley J. (1988) Control of relative abundance of perennials in chalk grassland in southern England. II Vertical canopy structure. J. Ecol. 76, 341-50.
58. Mitchley J. & Grubb P. J. (1986) Control of relative abundance of perennials in chalk grassland in southern England. I. Constancy of rank order and results of pot- and field-experiments on the role of interference. J. Ecol. 74, 1139-66
59. Morley T. (1982) Flowering frequency and vegetative reproduction in Erythronium albidum and E. propullans, and related observations Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 109, 169-76.
60. Mulkey S. S., Wright S. J. & Smith A. P. (1993) Comparative physiology and demography of three Neotropical forest shrubs: Alternative shade-adaptive character syndromes. Oecologia 96, 526-36.
61. Murray B. R. & Dickman C. R. (2000) Relationships between body size and geographical range size among Australian mammals: Has human impact distorted macroecological patterns? Ecography 23, 92-100.
62. Murray B. R. & Gill A. M. (2001) A comparative study of interspecific variation in fruit size among Australian eucalypts Ecography 24, 651-658.
63. Murray B. R., Rice B. L., Keith D. A. et al. (1999) Species in the tail of rank-abundance curves. Ecology 80, 1806-16.
64. Murray B. R, Thrall P. H & Woods M. J. (2001) Acacia species and rhizobial interactions: Implications for restoration of native vegetation. Ecol. Manage. Rest. 2, 213-219.
65. Murray B. R. & Westoby M. (2000) Properties of species in the tail of rank-abundance curves: The potential for increase in abundance. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2, 583-92.
66. Oakwood M., Jurado E., Leishman M. & Westoby M. (1993) Geographic ranges of plant species in relation to dispersal morphology, growth form and diaspore weight. J. Biogeogr. 20, 563-72.
67. Pavlik B. M., Ferguson N. & Nelson M. (1993) Assessing limitations on the growth of endangered plant populations, II. Seed production and seed bank dynamics of Erysimum capitatum ssp. angustum and Oenothera deltoides ssp. howellii. Biol. Conserv. 65, 267-78
68. Peat H. J. & Fitter A. H. (1994) Comparative analyses of ecological characteristics of British angiosperms. Biol. Rev. 69, 95-115.
69. Pirie C. D., Walmsley S., Ingle R., Jimenez A. P., Magallanes A. S. & Kelly C. K. (2000) Investigations in plant commonness and rarity: A comparison of seed removal patterns in the widespread Jatropha standleyi and the endemic J chamelensis (Euphorbiaceae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 71, 501-12.
70. Price T. (1997) Correlated evolution and independent contrasts. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond B. 352, 519-29.
71. Rabinowitz D. (1978) Abundance and diaspore weight in rare and common prairie grasses. Oecologia 37, 213-19.
72. Rabinowitz D (1981) Seven forms of rarity. In: The Biological Aspects of Rare Plant Conservation (eds H. Synge & J. Chichester) pp. 205-17. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
73. Rabinowitz D. & Rapp J. K. (1981) Dispersal abilities of seven sparse and common grasses from a Missouri prairie. Am. J. Bot. 68, 616-624.
74. Rabinowitz D. & Rapp J. K. (1985) Colonization and establishment of Missouri prairie plants on artificial soil disturbances. III. Species abundance distributions, survivorship, and rarity. Am. J. Bot. 72, 1635-40.
75. Rabinowitz D., Rapp J. K., Cairns S. & Mayer M. (1989) The persistence of rare prairie grasses in Missouri: Environmental variation buffered by reproductive output of sparse species. Am. Nat. 134, 525-44.
76. Rabinowitz D., Rapp J K. & Dixon P. M. (1984) Competitive abilities of sparse grass species: Means of persistence or cause of abundance. Ecology 65, 1144-54.
77. Rees M. (1995) Community structure in sand dune annuals. Is seed weight a key quantity? J. Ecol. 83, 857-86.
78. Schlichting C. D. (1986) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17, 667-93.
79. Schlichting C. D. & Pigliucci M. (1998) Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
80. Scott G., Entwhistle T., May T. & Stevens N. (1997) A Conservation Overview of Australian Non-Marine Lichens, Bryophytes, Algae and Fungi. Environment Australia, Canberra.
81. Snyder K. M., Baskin J. M. & Baskin C. C. (1994) Comparative ecology of the narrow endemic Echinacea tennesseensis and two geographically widespread congeners: Relative competitive ability and growth characteristics. Int. J. Plant Sci. 155, 57-65.
82. Strauss-Debenedetti S. & Berlyn G. (1994) Leaf anatomical responses to light in 5 tropical Moraceae of different successional status. Am. J. Bot. 81, 1582-91.
83. Sultan S. E. (1987) Evolutionary implications of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Evol. Biol. 21, 127-78.
84. Sultan S. E. (2001) Phenotypic plasticity for fitness components in Polygonum species of contrasting ecological breadth. Ecology 82, 328-43.
85. Sultan S. E., Wilczek A. M., Bell D. L. & Hand G. (1998a) Physiological response to complex environments in annual Polygonum species of contrasting ecological breadth. Oecologia 115, 564-78.
86. Sultan S. E., Wilczek A. M., Haddn S. D. & Brosi B. J. (1998b) Contrasting ecological breadth of co-occurring annual Polygonum species. J. Ecol. 86, 363-83.
87. Taylor D. R. & Aarssen L. W. (1990) Complex competitive relationships among genotypes of three perennial grasses: Implications for species coexistence. Am. Nat. 136, 305-27.
88. Thompson K., Gaston K. J. & Band S. R. (1999) Range size, dispersal and niche breadth in the herbaceous flora of central England J. Ecol. 87, 150-5.
89. Thompson K. & Grime J. P. (1979) Seasonal variation in the seed banks of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats. J. Ecol. 67, 893-921.
90. Thrall P. H., Burdon J. J. & Murray B. R. (2000) Metapopulation dynamics: A fragmented view of conservation biology In. Genetics, Demography and the Viability of Fragmented Populations (eds A. Young & G. Clarke) pp. 75-95. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
91. Underwood A. J. & Petraitis P. S. (1993) Structure of intertidal assemblages in different locations: How can local processes be compared? In: Species Diversity in Ecological Communities. Historical and Geographical Perspectives (eds R. E. Ricklefs & D. Schluter) pp. 39-51. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
92. Walck J. L., Baskin J. M. & Baskin C. C. (1999) Relative competitive abilities and growth characteristics of a narrowly endemic and a geographically widespread Solidago species (Asteraceae). Am. J. Bot. 86, 820-8.
93. Walters M B. & Field C. B. (1987) Photosynthetic light acclimation in two rainforest Piper species with different ecological amplitudes. Oecologia 72, 449-56.
94. Westoby M., Cunningham S. A., Fonseca C. R., Overton J. M. & Wright I. J. (1998) Phylogeny and variation in light capture area deployed per unit investment in leaves: Designs for selecting study species with a view to generalising. In: Inherent Variation in Plant Growth. Physiological Mechanisms and Ecological Consequences (eds H. Lambers, H. Poorter & M M. I. Van Vuuren) pp. 539-66. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.
95. Westoby M., Leishman M. R. & Lord J. M. (1995) On misinterpreting the 'phylogenetic correction' J. Ecol. 83, 531-4 .
96. Wiens J. A. (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct. Ecol. 3, 385-97 .
97. Witkowski E. T. F. & Lamont B. B. (1997) Does the rare Banksia goodu have inferior vegetative, reproductive or ecological attributes compared with its widespread co-occurring relative B. gardneri? J. Biogeogr. 24, 469-82.
98. Young A. G. & Brown A. H. D. (1998) Comparative analysis of the mating system of the rare woodland shrub Daviesia suaveolens and its common congener D. mimosoides. Heredity 80, 374-81.