Counterfactual thinking as a mechanism in narrative persuasion

Human Communication Research

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 301-328

  Tal Or, Nurit ^a   Boninger, David S ^a   Poran, Amir ^a   Gleicher, Faith ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043052993     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/hcr/30.3.301     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Bakker, A. B., Buunk, B. P., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1997). The moderating role of self-efficacy beliefs in the relationship between anticipated feelings of regret and condom use. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 2001-2014.
2. Bell, D. E. (1982). Regrets in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30, 961-981.
3. Branscombe, N. R., & Coleman, J. (1991, May). Judgment consequences of mentally simulating alternative victim or rapist behaviors and outcomes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
4. Brock, T. C. (1967). Communication discrepancy and intent to persuade as determinants of counterargument production. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 296-309.
5. Burnkrant, R. E., & Unnava, H. R. (1989). Self-referencing: A strategy for increasing processing of message content. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 628-638.
6. Calder, B. J., Insko, C. A., & Yandell, B. (1974). The relation of cognitive and memorial processes to persuasion in a simulated jury trial. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 62-93.
7. Cialdini, R. B., & Petty, R. E. (1981). Anticipatory opinion effects. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion (pp. 217-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Denzin, N. K. (2000). Foreword: Narrative's moment. In M. Andrews, S. D. Sclater, C. Squire, & A. Treacher (Eds.), Lines of narrative (pp. XI-XII). London: Routledge.
9. Fisher, W. R. (1987). Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
10. Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11. Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., Strathman, A., Armor, D. A., Hetts, J. J., & Ahn, M. (1995). With an eye toward the future: The impact of counterfactual thinking on affect, attitudes and behavior. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 283-304). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Gleicher, F., Kost, K. A., Baker, S. M., Strathman, A, Richman, S. A., & Sherman, S. J. (1990). The role of counterfactual thinking in judgment of affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 284-295.
13. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701-721.
14. Gregory, W. L., Burroughs, J. W., & Ainslie, F. M. (1985). Self relevant scenarios as an indirect means of attitude change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 435-444.
15. Gregory, W. L., Cialdini, R. B., & Carpenter, K. M. (1982). Self-relevant scenarios as mediators of likelihood estimates and compliance: Does imagining make it so? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 89-99.
16. Hetts, J. J., Boninger, D. S., Armor, D. A., Gleicher, F., & Nathanson, A. (2000). The influence of anticipated counterfactual regret on behavior. Journal of Psychology and Marketing, 17, 345-368.
17. Insko, C. A., Turnbull, W., & Yandell, B. (1974). Facultative and inhibiting effects of distraction on attitude change. Sociometry, 37, 508-528.
18. Kahnman, D., & Miller, D. T (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.
19. Kahnemen, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201-208). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. King, B. T., & Janis, I. L. (1956). Comparison of the effectiveness of improvised versus non-improvised role-playing in producing opinion changes. Human Relations, 9, 177-186.
21. Landman, J. (1987). Regret and elation following action and inaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 524-536.
22. Leventhal, H. (1970). Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 120-186). New York: Academic Press.
23. Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. The Economic Journal, 92, 805-824.
24. Love, R. E., & Greenwald, A. G. (1978). Cognitive responses to persuasion as mediators of opinion change. Journal of Social Psychology, 104, 231-241.
25. Lydon, J., Zanna, M. P., & Ross, M. (1988). Bolstering attitudes by autobiographical recall: Attitude persistence and selective memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 78-86.
26. Markman, K. D., Gavanski, I., Sherman, S. J., & McMullen, M. N. (1995). The impact of perceived control on the imagination of better and worse possible worlds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 588-595.
27. McGuire, W. J. (1969). The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 136-314). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
28. McMullen, M. N., Markman, K. D., & Gavanski, I. (1995). Living in neither the best nor worst of all possible worlds: Antecedents and consequences of upward and downward counterfactual thinking. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 133-167). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Miller, D. T., & McFarland, C. (1986). Counterfactual thinking and victim compensation: A test of norm theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 513-519.
30. Miller, D. T., & Taylor, B. R. (1995). Counterfactual thought, regret and superstition: How to avoid kicking yourself. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 305-331). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Nasco, S.A., & Marsh, K. L (1999). Gaining control through counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 556-568.
32. Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
33. Ortony, A., & Turner, T. J. (1990). What's basic about basic emotions? Psychological Review, 97, 315-331.
34. Perloff, R. M., & Brock, T. C. (1980). And thinking makes it so: Cognitive responses to persuasion. In M. E. Roloff & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Persuasion: New directions in memory and research (pp. 67-99). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
35. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: Brown.
36. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
37. Piotrow, P. T., Rimon, J. G., Winnard, K., Kincaid, D. L., Huntington, D., & Convisser, J. (1990). Mass media family planning promotion in three Nigerian cities. Studies in Family Planning, 21, 265-274.
38. Porter, W. M. (1992). The environment of the oil company: A semiotic analysis of Chevron's "People Do" commercials. In E. L. Toth & R. L. Heath (Eds.), Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations (pp. 279-300). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Prentice, D. A., Gerrig, R. J., & Bailis, D. S. (1997). What readers bring to the processing of fictional texts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 416-420.
40. Reinard, J. C. (1988). The empirical study of the persuasive effects of evidence: The status after fifty years of research. Human Communication Research, 15, 3-59.
41. Richard, R., Van der Pligt, J., & De Vries, N. (1995). Anticipated affective reactions and prevention of AIDS. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 9-21.
42. Richard, R., Van der Pligt, J., & De Vries, N. (1996a). Anticipated affect and behavioral choice. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 111-129.
43. Richard, R., Van der Pligt, J., & De Vries, N. (1996b). Anticipated regret and time perspective: Changing sexual risk-taking behavior. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9, 185-199.
44. Roese, N. J. (1994). The functional basis of counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 805-818.
45. Roese, N. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 133-148.
46. Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (1995). Outcome controllability and counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 620-628.
47. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
48. Salovey, P., Schneider, T. R., & Apanovitch, A. M. (2002). Message framing in the prevention and early detection of illness. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau, The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 391-406). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. Sanna, L. J., & Turley, K. J. (1996). Antecedents to spontaneous counterfactual thinking: Effects of expectancy violation and outcome valence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 906-919.
50. Sawyer, A. G. (1988). Can there be effective advertising without explicit conclusions? Decide for yourself. In S. Hecker & D. W. Stewart (Eds.), Nonverbal communication in advertising (pp. 159-184). Lexington, MA: Heath.
51. Seligman, M. E. P. (1992). Helplessness: On development, depression & death. New York: Freeman.
52. Taylor, S. E., & Pham, L. B. (1996). Mental simulation, motivation and action. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 219-235). New York: Guilford Press.
53. Tykocinski, O. E., Pittman, T. S., & Tuttle, E. E. (1995). Inaction inertia: Foregoing future benefits as a result of an initial failure to act. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 793-803.
54. Weiner, B. (1980). A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgment of help-giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 186-200.
55. Wells, G. L., & Gavanski, I. (1989). Mental simulation of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 161-169.
56. Wells, G. L., Taylor, B. R., & Turtle, J. W. (1987). The undoing of scenarios. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 421-430.
57. Wheeler, S. C., Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (1999). Fictional narratives change beliefs: Replications of Prentice, Gerrig, and Bailis (1997) with mixed corroboration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 136-141.
58. Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education and Behavior, 27, 591-615.
59. Zeelenberg, M., & Beattie, J. (1997). Consequences of regret aversion 2: Additional evidence for effects of feedback on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 63-78.
60. Zeelenberg, M., Beattie, J., Van der Pligt, J., & De Vries, N. (1996). Consequence of risk aversion: Effects of expected feedback on risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 148-158.