Making tracks: The forensic analysis of footprints and footwear impressions

Anatomical Record - Part B New Anatomist

Volumn 279, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 9-15

  Naples, Virginia L ^a   Miller, Jon S ^a  

^a NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Body proportions; Education; Footprint analysis; Forensic science; Gait analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY WEIGHT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DNA FOOTPRINTING; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FORENSIC SCIENCE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEARNING; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SHOE; TEAMWORK; VELOCITY;

EID: 4043051072     PISSN: 0003276X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ar.b.20025     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Bodziak WJ. 1995. Footwear impression evidence. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
2. Dillon H. 1999. Forensic scientists: a career in the crime lab. Occupat Outlook Quart 43:2-7.
3. DiMaggio JA. 1995. Forensic podiatry: an emerging new field. J Forens Ident 45:495-497.
4. Eckert WG. 1997. Introduction to forensic sciences, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
5. Hamm ED. 1989. Track identification: an historical overview. J Forens Ident 39:333-338.
6. Heppner F. 1996. Learning science by doing sciences. Am Biol Teacher 57:372-374.
7. Lawson AE. 1999. What should students learn about the nature of science and how should we teach it? J Coll Sci Teach 28:401-411.
8. Lumpe AT, Oliver JS. 1991. Dimensions of hands-on science. Am Biol Teacher 53:345-348.
9. Miller JS, Naples VL. 2002. Forensic entomology for the laboratory-based biology classroom. Am Biol Teacher 64:13-142.
10. Rowe WF. 1981. Interpretation of shoe wear patterns in a personal injury case. J Forens Sci 26:608-611.