Stakeholder discourse and water management - Implementation of the participatory model CATCH in a Northern Italian alpine sub-catchment

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 317-331

  Lupo Stanghellini, P S ^a   Collentine, D ^b  

^a Trento Museum of Natural Sciences   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÄVLE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALPINE VALLEYS; CATCHMENT AREA; CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT; DOMESTIC USE; ENERGY PRODUCTIONS; EUROPEAN UNION; FLEXIBLE TOOL; IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION; MANAGEMENT PLANS; PARTICIPATORY PROCESS; SMALL CATCHMENT; STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS; STAKEHOLDER INTEREST; STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION; SUB-CATCHMENT; SUSTAINABLE USE; WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVES;

CATCHMENTS; LANDFORMS; MANAGEMENT; WATER CONSERVATION; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY;

RUNOFF;

ALPINE ENVIRONMENT; CATCHMENT; GUIDELINE; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABILITY; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER PLANNING; WATER QUALITY; WATER USE; DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY; MODELING;

ITALY; EURASIA; EUROPE; SOUTHERN EUROPE; TRENTINO-ALTO ADIGE; TRENTO; VALSUGANA;

EID: 40249105009     PISSN: 10275606     EISSN: 16077938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hess-12-317-2008     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arnstein, S.: A Ladder of Citizen Participation, J. Am. I. Planners, 35, 216-224, 1969.
2. Beierle, T.: Using Social Goals to Evaluate Public Participation in Environmental Decisions, Policy Study Review, 16, 75-103, 1999.
3. Beierle, T.: The Quality of Stakeholder-Based Decisions, Risk Anal., 22, 739-749, 2002.
4. Berry, J. M., Portney, K. E., and Thomson, K.: The rebirth of urban democracy, Brookings Institution, Washington DC, USA, 1993.
5. Bishop, P. and Davis, G.: Mapping Public Participation in Policy Choices, J. Publ. Adm., 61, 12-29, 2002.
6. Broderick, K.: Communities in Catchments: Implications for Natural Resource Management, Geogr. Res., 43, 286-296, 2005.
7. Charnley, S. and Engelbert, B.: Evaluating public participation in environmental decision-making: EPA's superfund community involvement program, J. Environ. Manage., 77, 165-182, 2005.
8. Chase, L. C., Decker, D. J., and Lauber, T. B.: Public Participation in Wildlife Management: What Do Stakeholders Want?, Society and Natural Resources, 17, 629-639, 2004.
9. Chess, C. and Purcell, K.: Public Participation and the Environment: Do We Know What Works?, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 2685-2692, 1999.
10. Collentine, D., Forsman, Å., Galaz, V., Kallner-Bastviken, S., and Ståhl-Delbanco, A.: CATCH: decision support system for stakeholders in catchment areas, Water Policy, 4, 447-463, 2002.
11. Collentine, D., Forsman, Å., Galaz, V., Kallner-Bastviken, S., and Ståhl-Delbanco, A.: CATCH: A Method for Structured Discussions and Tool for Decision Support, Ambio, 34, 579-580, 2005.
12. Darnall, N. and Jolley, G. J., Involving the Public: When Are Surveys and Stakeholder Interviews Effective?, Review of Policy Research, 21, 581-593, 2004.
13. Driscoll, C. and Starik, M.: The Primordial Stakeholder: Advancing the Conceptual Consideration of Stakeholder Status for the Natural Environment, J. Bus. Ethics, 49, 55-73, 2004.
14. Edelenbos, J. and Klijn, E. H.: Managing Stakeholder Involvement in Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Six Interactive Processes in the Netherlands, J. Publ. Adm. Res. Theor., 16, 417-446, 2005.
15. European Commission, Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) - Guidance Document no. 8, http://www.europa. eu.int/comm/environment/water/water-framework/index en.html, 2003.
16. Koontz, T.: We Finished the Plan, So Now What? Impacts of Collaborative Stakeholder Participation on Land Use Policy, The Policy Studies Journal, 33, 459-481, 2005.
17. Lawrence, R. L. and Deagen, D. A.: Choosing Public Participation Methods for Natural Resources: A Context-Specific Guide, Society and Natural Resources, 14, 857-872, 2001.
18. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., and Wood D. J.: Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: the principle of who and what really counts, Acad. Manage. Rev., 22, 853-886, 1997.
19. Mostert, E.: The European Water Framework Directive and water management research, Phys. Chem. Earth, 28, 523-527, 2003.
20. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD): Citizens and Partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-making, OECD Publishing, Paris, France, 2001a.
21. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD): Engaging Citizens in Policy-making: Information, Consultation and Public Participation, OECD Public Management Policy Brief No. 10, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/24/34/ 2384040.pdf, 2001b.
22. Pateman, C: Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1970.
23. Redpath, S. M., Arroyo, B. E., Leckie, F. M., Bacon, P., Bayfield, N., Gutierrez, R. J., and Thirgood, S. J.: Using Decision Modeling with Stakeholders to Reduce Human-Wildlife Conflict: a Raptor-Grouse Case Study, Conserv. Biol., 18, 350-359, 2002.
24. Rowe, G. and Frewer, L. J.: Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation, Sci. Technol. Hum. Val., 25, 3-29, 2000.
25. Shand, D. and Arnberg, M.: Background Paper in Responsive Government: Service Quality Initiatives, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Paris, France, http://www.oecd.org, 1996.
26. Thomas, J. C.: Public Involvement in Public Management: Adapting and Testing a Borrowed Theory, Public Admin. Rev., 50, 435-445, 1990.
27. Thomas, J. C.: Public Involvement and Governmental Effectiveness: A Decision-making Model for Public Managers, Administrative Science and Society, 24, 444-469, 1993.
28. Webler, T., Tuler, S., and Kruger, R.: What is a Good Public Participation Process? Five Perspectives from the Public, Environ. Manage., 27, 435-450, 2001.