Globalization and science education in a community-based after-school program

Cultural Studies of Science Education

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 73-95

  Eisenhart, Margaret ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

After school science; Globalization; Urban Black American girls

Indexed keywords

EID: 40249095912     PISSN: 18711502     EISSN: 18711510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11422-007-9084-7     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anderson, E. (2000). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York: W.W. Norton.
2. Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments. Journal of Learning Sciences, 37, 143-156.
3. Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7, 585-614.
4. Carrithers, M. (1992). Why humans have cultures: Explaining anthropology and social diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
6. Dino, A. L. T. (2007). Making fun: How urban Black girls craft identity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder.
7. Dyson, A. (1997). Writing superheroes: Contemporary childhood, popular culture, and classroom literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Eisenhart, M. (2001). Educational ethnography past, present, and future: Ideas to think with. Educational Researcher, 30(8), 16-27.
9. Eisenhart, M., & Edwards, L. (2004). Red-eared sliders and neighborhood dogs: Creating third spaces to support ethnic girls' interests in technological and scientific expertise. Children, Youth and Environment 14(2), 156-177.
10. Eisenhart, M., & Finkel, E. (1998). Women's science: Learning and succeeding from the margins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Erickson, F. (1996). Going for the zone: The social and cognitive ecology of teacher-student interaction in classroom conversations. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 29-62). New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. González, N., Moll, L., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Gutiérrez, K., Rymes, B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 445-471.
14. Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15. Lee, C. (2001). Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 97-141.
16. Lemke, J. (1993). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
17. Luke, A., & Carrington, V. (2002). Globalisation, literacy, curriculum practice. In R. Fisher, G. Brooks & M. Lewis (Eds.), Raising standards in literacy (pp. 231-250). London: Routledge/Falmer.
18. Lynch, M., & Macbeth, D. (1998). Demonstrating physics lessons. In J. Greeno & S. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 269-297). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Moje, E., Ciechanowski, K., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 38-70.
21. Moll, L. (2000). Inspired by Vygotsky: Ethnographic experiments in education. In C. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research (pp. 256-268). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. O'Connor, M., Godfrey, L., & Moses, R. (1998). The missing data point: Negotiating purposes in classroom mathematics, science. In J. Greeno & S. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 89-125). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Osbourne, M., & Luke, A. (in press). Critical literacy and scientific discourses. Cultural Studies of Science Education.
24. Richardson Bruna, K. (in press). Mejor a Augusto, i sabe/You'd better ask Augusto, he knows: Transnational social capital and the work of peer mediation. Cultural Studies of Science Education.
25. Suárez-Orozco, C. (2004). Formulating identity in a globalized world. In M. Suárez-Orozco & D. Qin-Hilliard (Eds.), Globalization: Culture and education in the new millennium (pp. 173-202). Berkeley: University of California Press.
26. Suárez-Orozco, M., & Qin-Hilliard, D. (2004). Globalization: Culture and education in the new millennium. In M. Suárez-Orozco & D. Qin-Hilliard (Eds.), Globalization: Culture and education in the new millennium (pp. 1-37). Berkeley: University of California Press.
27. Tan, E., & Barton, A. (in press). Transforming participation in sixth grade science. Cultural Studies in Education.
28. Vélez-Ibáñez, C., & Greenberg, J. (1992). Formation and transformation of funds of knowledge. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 23, 313-335.
29. Willis, P. (1979). Learning to labor. New York: Columbia University Press.
30. Woodrow, K. E. (2007). Culturally responsive middle school science: A case study of needs, demands and challenges. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder.