BOLD responses reflecting dopaminergic signals in the human ventral tegmental area

Science

Volumn 319, Issue 5867, 2008, Pages 1264-1267

  D'Ardenne, Kimberlee ^a   McClure, Samuel M ^a   Nystrom, Leigh E ^a   Cohen, Jonathan D ^a,b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOPAMINE;

IMAGING METHOD; NEUROLOGY; PREDICTION; RESONANCE; SIGNAL;

ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; OXYGEN BLOOD LEVEL; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; VENTRAL TEGMENTUM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BASAL GANGLIA; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; CUES; DOPAMINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; OXYGEN; PROBABILITY; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); REWARD; VENTRAL TEGMENTAL AREA;

EID: 40049086223     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1150605     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. P. R. Montague, P. Dayan, T. J. Sejnowski, J. Neurosci. 16, 1936 (1996).
2. W. Schultz, P. Dayan, P. R. Montague, Science 275, 1593 (1997).
3. G. Paxinos, X. Huang, Atlas of the Human Brainstem (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1995).
4. 3, which is inadequate for imaging from the VTA and only gives a small number of measurements in the SN.
5. B. Seymour et al., Nature 429, 664 (2004).
6. B. H. Schott et al., Learn. Mem. 11, 383 (2004).
7. B. C. Wittmann et al., Neuron 45, 459 (2005).
8. P. Dunckley et al., J. Neurosci. 25, 7333 (2005).
9. V. Menon, D. J. Levitin, Neuroimage 28, 175 (2005).
10. J. P. O'Doherty, T. W. Buchanan, B. Seymour, R. J. Dolan, Neuron 49, 157 (2006).
11. B. H. Schott et al., J. Neurosci. 26, 1407 (2006).
12. J. C. Dreher, P. Kohn, K. F. Berman, Cereb. Cortex 16, 561 (2006).
13. N. Bunzeck, E. Duzel, Neuron 51, 369 (2006).
14. M. Fairhurst, K. Wiech, P. Dunckley, I. Tracey, Pain 128, 101 (2007).
15. P. N. Tobler, P. C. Fletcher, E. T. Bullmore, W. Schultz, Neuron 54, 167 (2007).
16. B. H. Schott et al., Brain 130, 2412 (2007).
17. B. C. Wittmann, N. Bunzeck, R. J. Dolan, E. Duzel, Neuroimage 38, 194 (2007).
18. N. Bunzeck et al., Cereb. Cortex 17, 2940 (2007).
19. K. A. Schneider, M. C. Richter, S. Kastner, J. Neurosci. 24, 8975 (2004).
20. K. A. Schneider, S. Kastner, J. Neurophysiol. 94, 2491 (2005).
21. A. R. Guimaraes et al., Hum. Brain Mapp. 6, 33 (1998).
22. H. Oikawa, M. Sasaki, Y. Tamakawa, S. Ehara, K. Tohyama, AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 23, 1747 (2002).
23. T. Eckert et al., Neuroimage 21, 229 (2004).
24. V. Napadow, R. Dhond, D. Kennedy, K. K. Hui, N. Makris, Neuroimage 32, 1113 (2006).
25. J. R. Hollerman, W. Schultz, Nat. Neurosci. 1, 304 (1998).
26. C. D. Fiorillo, P. N. Tobler, W. Schultz, Science 299, 1898 (2003).
27. The reward prediction error term depends on time through a value function, V(t), that gives the reward expected into the infinite future. It is the time derivative of V(t), dV(t)/dt, that gives the reward expected at time t and is hypothesized to be communicated to midbrain dopamine nuclei (1).
28. N. K. Logothetis, J. Pauls, M. Augath, T. Trinath, A. Oeltermann, Nature 412, 150 (2001).
29. A. Viswanathan, R. D. Freeman, Nat. Neurosci. 10, 1308 (2007).
30. The reward prediction error signal could also be generated by recurrent collaterals in the VTA.
31. H. M. Bayer, P. W. Glimcher, Neuron 47, 129 (2005).
32. H. M. Bayer, B. Lau, P. W. Glimcher, J. Neurophysiol. 98, 1428 (2007).
33. G. Pagnoni, C. F. Zink, P. R. Montague, G. S. Berns, Nat. Neurosci. 5, 97 (2002).
34. B. Knutson, A. Westdorp, E. Kaiser, D. Hommer, Neuroimage 12, 20 (2000).
35. S. M. McClure, G. S. Berns, P. R. Montague, Neuron 38, 339 (2003).
36. J. P. O'Doherty, P. Dayan, K. Friston, H. Critchley, R. J. Dolan, Neuron 38, 329 (2003).
37. J. O'Doherty et al., Science 304, 452 (2004).
38. The VTA and SN include a variety of neuron types, not just dopaminergic neurons, and the BOLD response measured from these nuclei presumably reflects the composite activity of these neurons. Nevertheless, as discussed further on, our findings suggest that the BOLD responses we observed reflected a dominant, if not exclusive, influence of dopamine neuron activity. In addition, the methods we used were not optimized for detecting responses in the SN or VStr. Because of the cardiac gated functional data acquisition, image acquisition time was necessarily less than the time between heartbeats, which limited the number of slices we were able to acquire (see supporting online material for details). Slices were placed so as to optimize our coverage of the VTA. The VTA is small and thus, even with the number of slices we were limited to by the participant's heart rate, we were able to record from the entire region. However, we were only able to record from portions of the striatum (Fig. 3A) and SN. Given this limited coverage of the striatum and SN, our measurements from these structures are likely to have been underpowered.
39. A recent study reports an equal BOLD-fMRI response in the VStr to delivery of juice and water (40). Consequently, we included both juice and water trials in our study to keep participants as interested as possible. Juice and water trials were randomized across all scanning runs, and results are collapsed across both trial types.
40. S. M. McClure, K. M. Ericson, D. I. Laibson, G. Loewenstein, J. D. Cohen, J. Neurosci. 27, 5796 (2007).
41. In addition to regressors for reward prediction errors, we also included regressors for the display of the visual cue and for dV/dt. No brain regions showed a significant response to the display of the cue during and after training [compare to (37)]; however, the visual cortex was not imaged in this experiment due to slice positioning (Fig. 1C). Additionally, no brain regions showed a significant response to dV/dt.
42. Mean event-related BOLD responses were calculated for the receipt of expected and unexpected rewards (see supporting online material for details on impulse response function generation and for plots of time course data). The areas under the response curves were calculated from time t = 3 s to 7 s after reward receipt and correlated across subjects in the VTA and VStr. This segment of the response curves was selected because it corresponds to the time points of the peak in the BOLD response.
43. t) and increases linearly with the probability of winning.
44. N. D. Daw, S. Kakade, P. Dayan, Neural Netw. 15, 603 (2002).
45. J. Mirenowicz, W. Schultz, Nature 379, 449 (1996).
46. M. A. Ungless, P. J. Magill, J. P. Bolam, Science 303, 2040 (2004).
47. D. L. Cameron, M. W. Wessendorf, J. T. Williams, Neuroscience 77, 155 (1997).
48. T. S. Braver, J. D. Cohen, in Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII, S. Monsell, J. Driver, Eds. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000) pp. 713-737.
49. G. Aston-Jones, J. D. Cohen, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 28, 403 (2005).
50. H. M. Duvernoy, The Human Brain Stem and Cerebellum: Surface, Structure, Vascularization, Three Dimensional Sectional Anatomy, and MRI (Springer, New York, 1995).
51. We thank V. Napadow for access to the brainstem normalization algorithm ahead of its publication and for guidance with data acquisition. We thank C. L. Buck, K. Lowenberg, and E. Barkley-Levenson for help with participant recruitment and scanning. We also thank R. Tengi for helping manage the large amount of disk space necessary to accomplish data analysis. This work was supported by NIH grants P50 MH062196 ( J.D.C.), T32 MH065214 ( J.D.C.), and F32 MH072141 (S.M.M.).