Models in geography revisited

Geoforum

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 675-686

  Clifford, N J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ABM agency; Generative social science; Structure

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; DECISION ANALYSIS; GEOGRAPHICAL THEORY; NUMERICAL MODEL; SOCIAL THEORY; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 39849084497     PISSN: 00167185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.016     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Ackerman E.A. Where is a research frontier?. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 53 (1963) 429-440
2. Axtell R.L., and Epstein J.M. Agent-Based Modelling: Understanding Our Creation (1994), The Bulletin of the Sana Fe Institute winter
3. Balsiger P.W. Supradisciplinary research practices: history, objectives and rationale. Futures 36 (2004) 407-421
4. Barnes B. People, place, and region: retheorizing economic geography: from the quantitative revolution to the "cultural turn". Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91 (2001) 546-565
5. Barnes T.J. Placing ideas: genius loci, heterotopia and geography's quantitative revolution. Progress in Human Geography 28 (2004) 565-595
6. Beck M.B. Water quality modeling: a review of the analysis of uncertainty. Water Resources Research 23 (1987) 1393-1442
7. Beck B. Model Evaluation and Performance. In: El-Shaarawi A.H., and Piegorsch W.W. (Eds). Encyclopedia of Environmetrics (2002), Wiley, Chichester 1275-1279
8. Bennett P., Bryant J., and Howard N. Drama Theory and Confrontation Analysis. In: Rosenhead J.V., and Mingers J. (Eds). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict (2001), Wiley
9. Berry B.J.L. Approaches to regional analysis: a synthesis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 54 (1964) 2-11
10. Beven K. How far can we go in distributed hydrological modeling?. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 5 (2001) 1-12
11. Bhaskar R. Reclaiming Reality (1989), Verso, London
12. Boero, R., 2003. Some methodological issues of agent based models in social science. .
13. Brewer G.D. The challenge of interdisciplinarity. Policy Sciences 32 (1999) 327-337
14. Brown H.I. The Methodological Roles of Theory in Science. In: Rhoads B.L., and Thorne C.E. (Eds). The Scientific Nature of Geomorphology (1996), Wiley, Chichester 3-20
15. Bruce A., Lyall C., Tait J., and Williams R. Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: the case of the fifth framework programme. Futures 36 (2004) 457-470
16. Bryant J. Diagnosing Collaborative Style. In: Hibbert P. (Ed). Co-Creating Emergent Insight: Multi-organisational Partnerships, Alliances and Networks (2003), University of Strathclyde, Glasgow 20-26
17. Carlsson, S.A., 2003. Information systems evaluation research: alternative perspectives and schools. In: Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, Reading, pp. 59-66.
18. Cartwright N. How the Laws of Physics Lie (1983), Oxford University Press, New York
19. Church M. Think globally, learn locally: broadening perspectives of the Earth. Geoscience Canada 25 (1998) 171-182
20. Clarke M., and Wilson A. Mathematical Models in Human Geography: 20 Years on. In: Peet R., and Thrift N. (Eds). New Models in Geography (1989), Unwin Hyman, London 30-40
21. Clifford N.J., and Richards K.S. Earth system science: an oxymoron?. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 30 (2005) 379-383
22. Conte R. Social intelligence among autonomous agents. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 5 (1999) 203-228
23. Conte R., Edmonds B., Moss S., and Sawyer R.K. Sociology and social theory in agent based social simulation: a symposium. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 7 (2001) 183-205
24. Davidsson P. Multi-Agent Based Simulation: Beyond Social Simulation. In: Moss S., and Davidsson (Eds). MABS 2000 (2002), Springer, Heidelberg 97-107
25. Epstein J.M. Agent-based computational models and generative social science. Complexity 4 (1999) 41-60
26. Giddens A. Central Problems in Social Theory (1979), Macmillan, London
27. Gilbert N., and Banks S. Platforms and methods for agent-based modeling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99 (2002) 7197-7198
28. Gotts N.M., Polhill J.C., and Law A.N.R. Aspiration levels in a land use simulation. Cybernetics and Systems 34 (2003) 663-683
29. Gregory D.J. The Crisis of Modernity? Human Geography and Critical Social Theory. In: Peet R., and Thrift N. (Eds). New Models in Geography (1989), Unwin Hyman, London 348-385
30. Gross D., and Strand R. Can agent-based models assist decisions on large-scale practical problems? A philosophical analysis. Complexity 5 (2000) 26-33
31. Haggett P., and Chorley R.J. Models, Paradigms and the New Geography. In: Chorley R.J., and Haggett P. (Eds). Models in Geography (1967), Methuen, London 19-41
32. Hansson B. Interdisciplinarity: for what purpose?. Policy Sciences 32 (1999) 339-343
33. Harrison S., Massey D., and Richards K. Complexity and emergence (another conversation). Area 38 (2006) 465-471
34. Harvey D. Explanation in Geography (1969), Arnold, London
35. Harvey D. Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference (1996), Blackwell, Oxford
36. Hetherington K. In Place of Geometry: the Materiality of Place. In: Hetherington K., and Munro R. (Eds). Ideas of Difference: Social Spaces and the Labour of Division (1997), Blackwell, Oxford 183-199
37. In: Heudin J.C. (Ed). Virtual Worlds: Synthetic Universes, Digital Life, and Complexity (1999), Perseus Books, New York
38. Huisman, O., Forer, P., 1998. Computational agents and urban life spaces: a preliminary realisation of the time-geography of student lifestyles. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on GeoComputation. University of Bristol, UK, September 1998.
39. Johnston R. Geography: a different sort of discipline?. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS28 (2003) 133-141
40. Karlquist A. Going beyond disciplines; the meaning of interdisciplinarity. Policy Sciences 32 (1999) 379-383
41. Layder D. New Strategies in Social Research (1993), Polity Press, Cambridge
42. Leyshon A. Annihilating Space? The Speed-up of Communications. In: Allen J., and Hamnett C. (Eds). A Shrinking World? Global Unevenness and Inequality (1995), Oxford University Press, Oxford 11-54
43. Lovelock J.E. GAIA and emergence: a response to Kirchner and Volk. Climate Change 57 (2003) 1-3
44. Lovering J. The Restructuring Debate. In: Peet R., and Thrift N. (Eds). New Models in Geography (1989), Unwin Hyman, London 198-223
45. Macy M., and Willer R. From factors to actors: computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annual Review of Sociology 28 (2002) 143-166
46. Martin R. The new 'geographical turn' in economics: some critical reflections. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23 (1999) 65-91
47. Massey D.B. For Space (2005), Sage, London
48. Minshull R. An Introduction to Models in Geography (1975), Longman, London
49. Nissani M. Ten cheers for interdisciplinarity: the case for interdisciplinary knowledge and research. Social Science Journal 32 (1997) 1-14
50. Nute D. NED-2: an agent based decision support system for forest ecosystem management. Environmental Modelling and Software 19 (2004) 581-589
51. Ormerod, P., Rosewell, B., 2002. On the methodology of assessing agent-based evolutionary models in the social sciences. Second Brisbane Club workshop on complex adaptive systems, University of Manchester, UK, July 2002. pp. 1-19.
52. O'Sullivan D. Complexity science and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS29 (2004) 282-295
53. O'Sullivan D., and Haklay M. Agent-based models and individualism: is the world agent-based?. Environment and Planning A 32 (2000) 1409-1425
54. Pahl R.E. Sociological Models in Geography. In: Chorley R.J., and Haggett P. (Eds). Models in Geography (1967), Methuen, London 217-242
55. Parker D.C., Manson S.M., Janssen M.A., Hoffmann M.J., and Deadman P. Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: a review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93 (2003) 314-337
56. Pawson R., and Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation (1997), Sage, London
57. Peet R., and Thrift N. Political Economy and Human Geography. In: Peet R., and Thrift N. (Eds). New Models in Geography (1989), Unwin Hyman, London 3-29
58. Prigogine I., and Stengers I. The End of Certainty: Time, Chaos, and the New Laws of Nature (1997), Free Press, New York
59. Ravetz, J., 1990. Knowledge in an uncertain world. New Scientist 22 September 1990.
60. Sanders L., Pumain D., Mathian H., Guérin-Pace F., and Bura S. SIMPOP: A multiagent system for the study of urbanism. Environment and Planning B 24 (1997) 287-305
61. Sayer R.A. Explanation in economic geography. Progress in Human Geography 6 (1982) 68-88
62. Stoddart D.R. Organism and Ecosystem as Geographical Models. In: Chorley R.J., and Haggett P. (Eds). Models in Geography (1967), Methuen, London 511-548
63. Szymanski R., and Agnew J.A. Order and Skepticism: Human Geography and the Dialectic of Science. Resource Publications in Geography (1981), Association of American Geographers, Washington
64. Tesfatsion L. Agent-based modelling of evolutionary economic systems. IEEE Transactions of Evolutionary Computations 5 (2001) 437-441
65. Torrens, P., 2001. Can geocomputation save urban simulation? Throw some agents into the mixture, simmer, and wait. Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis Working Paper 32. UCL.
66. In: Trappl R., and Petta P. (Eds). Creating Personalities for Synthetic Actors: Towards Autonomous Personality Agents (1997), Springer, Berlin
67. Ziman. Emerging out of nature into history: the plurality of the sciences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London A 361 (2003) 1617-1633