Puntambekar et al. Laparoscopic Total Radical Hysterectomy by the Pune Technique: Our Experience of 248 Cases

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 254-255

  Ramirez, Pedro T ^a   Frumovitz, Michael ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER STAGING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; LETTER; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; REPEAT PROCEDURE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLPOTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 39749148595     PISSN: 15534650     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.12.003     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Puntambekar S.P., Palep R.J., Puntambekar S.S., Wagh G.N., Patil A.M., Rayate N.V., et al. Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14 (2007) 682-689
2. Lopes A.D., Hall J.R., and Monaghan J.M. Drainage following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: dogma or need?. Obstet Gynecol 86 (1995) 960-963
3. Srisomboon J., Phongnarisorn C., Suprasert P., Cheewakriangkrai C., Siriaree S., and Charoenkwan K. A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer. J Obstet Gynecol Res 28 (2002) 149-153
4. Franchi M., Trimbos J.B., Zanaboni F.vd., Velden J., Reed N., Coens C., et al. Randomized trial of drains versus no drains following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Gynecological Cancer Group (EORTC-GCG) study in 234 patients. Eur J Cancer 43 (2007) 1265-1268