Object features used by humans and monkeys to identify rotated shapes

Journal of Vision

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2008, Pages

  Nielsen, Kristina J ^a,b   Logothetis, Nikos K ^a   Rainer, Gregor ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^b SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Macaca mulatta; Object recognition; View invariance

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MACACA; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; ROTATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ANIMALS; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; ROTATION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 39749136232     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/8.2.9     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ahumada, A. J., & Lovell, J. (1971). Stimulus features in signal detection. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 1751-1756.
2. Anderson, B., Peissig, J. J., Singer, J., & Sheinberg, D. L. (2006). XOR style tasks for testing visual object processing in monkeys. Vision Research, 46, 1804-1815.
3. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
4. Einhäuser, W., Kruse, W., Hoffmann, K. P., & König, P. (2006). Differences of monkey and human overt attention under natural conditions. Vision Research, 46, 1194-1209.
5. Fujita, K. (2001). Perceptual completion in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and pigeons (Columbia livia). Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 115-125.
6. Gauthier, I., Hayward, W. G., Tarr, M. J., Anderson, A. W., Skudlarski, P., & Gore, J. C. (2002). BOLD activity during mental rotation and viewpoint-dependent object recognition. Neuron, 34, 161-171.
7. Gibson, B. M., Lazareva, O. F., Gosselin, F., Schyns, P. G., & Wasserman, E. A. (2007). Nonaccidental properties underlie shape recognition in mammalian and nonmammalian vision. Current Biology, 17, 336-340.
8. Gossellin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2001). Bubbles: A technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks. Vision Research, 41, 2261-2271.
9. Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2004). No troubles with bubbles: A reply to Murray and Gold. Vision Research, 44, 471-477.
10. Grill-Spector, K., Kushnir, T., Edelman, S., Avidan, G., Itzchak, Y., & Malach, R. (1999). Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron, 24, 187-203.
11. Hollard, V. D., & Delius, J. D. (1982). Rotational invariance to visual pattern recognition by pigeons and humans. Science, 218, 804-806.
12. James, T. W., Humphrey, G. K., Gati, J. S., Menon, R. S. & Goodaie, M. A. (2002). Differential effects of viewpoint on object-driven activation in dorsal and ventral streams. Neuron, 35, 793-801.
13. Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303.
14. Jolicoeur, P., & Milliken, B. (1989). Identification of disoriented objects: Effects of context of prior presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 200-210.
15. Judge, S. J., Richmond, B. J., & Chu, F. C. (1980). Implantation of magnetic search coils for measurement of eye position: An improved method. Vision Research, 20, 535-538.
16. Kovács, G., Vogels, R., & Orban, G. A. (1995). Selectivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons for partially occluded shapes. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 1984-1997.
17. Lawson, R. (1999). Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation. Acta Psychologica, 102, 221-245.
18. Lawson, R., & Jolicoeur, P. (2003). Recognition thresholds for plane-rotated pictures of familiar objects. Acta Psychologica, 112, 17-41.
19. Lee, H., Simpson, G. V., Logothetis, N. K., & Rainer, G. (2005). Phase locking of single neuron activity to theta oscillations during working memory in monkey extrastriate visual cortex. Neuron, 45, 147-156.
20. Liter, J. C. (1998). The contribution of qualitative and quantitative shape features to object recognition across changes of view. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1056-1067.
21. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Bülthoff, H. H., & Poggio, T. (1994). View-dependent object recognition by monkeys. Current Biology, 4, 401-414.
22. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., & Poggio, T. (1995). Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Current Biology, 5, 552-563.
23. Logothetis, N. K., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). Visual object recognition. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 19, 5777-621.
24. Murray, R. F., & Gold, J. M. (2004a). Troubles with bubbles. Vision Research, 44, 461-470.
25. Murray, R. F., & Gold, J. M. (2004b). Reply to Gosselin and Schyns. Vision Research, 44, 479-482.
26. Newell, F. N. (1998). Stimulus context and view dependence in object recognition. Perception, 27, 47-68.
27. Nielsen, K. J., Logothetis, N. K., & Rainer, G. (2006). Discrimination strategies of humans and rhesus monkeys for complex visual displays. Current Biology, 16, 814-820.
28. Osada, Y., & Schiller, P. H. (1994). Can monkeys see objects under conditions of transparency and occlusion. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 35, 1664.
29. Robinson, D. A. (1963). A method of measuring eye movement using a scleral search coil in a magnetic field. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 10, 137-145.
30. Schyns, P. G. (1998). Diagnostic recognition: Task constraints, object information, and their interactions. 147-179.
31. Sugita, Y. (1999). Grouping of image fragments in primary visual cortex. Nature, 401, 269-272.
32. Takano, Y. (1989). Perception of rotated forms: A theory of information types. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 1-59.
33. Tanaka, K. (1996). Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 19, 109-139.
34. Tarr, M. J., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1998). Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine. Cognition, 67, 1-20.
35. Tarr, M. J., Bülthoff, H. H., Zabinski, M., & Blanz, V. (1997). To what extent do unique parts influence recognition across changes in viewpoint? Psychological Science, 8, 282-289.
36. Tarr, M. J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
37. Ullman, S. (2007). Object recognition and segmentation by a fragment-based hierarchy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 58-64.
38. Vuilleumier, P., Henson, R. N., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2002). Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 491-499.
39. Wang, G., Obama, S., Yamashita, W., Sugihara, T., & Tanaka, K. (2005). Prior experience of rotation is not required for recognizing objects seen from different angles. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1568-1575.
40. Wilson, K. D., & Farah, M. J. (2003). When does the visual-system use viewpoint-invariant representations during recognition? Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 399-415.