Effects of cognitive factors on perceived odor intensity in adaptation/ habituation processes: From 2 different odor presentation methods

Chemical Senses

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 163-171

  Kobayashi, Takefumi ^a,b   Sakai, Nobuyuki ^b,c   Kobayakawa, Tatsu ^b   Akiyama, Sachiyo ^b,d   Toda, Hideki ^b   Saito, Sachiko ^c,e  

^a BUNKYO GAKUIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^c Kobe Shoin Women's University   (Japan)

^d Japan Sport Council   (Japan)

^e Saito Sachiko Taste and Smell Institute   (Japan)

Author keywords

Adaptation and habitation; Cognitive effects; Description; Odor; Perceived intensity; Preference level

Indexed keywords

ANETHOLE;

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JAPANESE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; ODOR; OLFACTOMETER; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTOR SENSITIVITY; SENSORY STIMULATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; ANISOLES; COGNITION; FEMALE; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HUMANS; MALE; ODORS; PERCEPTION; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SMELL;

EID: 39749118597     PISSN: 0379864X     EISSN: 14643553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjm075     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ayabe-Kanamura S, Schicker I, Laska.M, Hudson R, Distel H, Kobayakawa T, Saito, S. 1998. Differences in perception of everyday odors: A Japanese-German cross-cultural study. Chem Senses. 23:31-38.
2. Berglund U. 1974. Dynamic properties of the olfactory system. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 237:17-27.
3. Cain WS. 1974. Perception of odor intensity and the time-course of olfactory adaptation. ASHRAE Trans. 80:53-75.
4. Dalton P. 1996. Odor perception and beliefs about risk. Chem Senses. 4:447-458,
5. Dalton P. 2000. Psychophysical and behavioral characteristics of olfactory adaptation. Chem Senses. 25:487-492.
6. Dalton P. 2002. Odor, irritation and perception of health risk. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 75:283-290.
7. Dalton P, Wysocki CJ, Brody MJ, Lwley HJ. 1997. The influence of cognitive bias on the perceived odor irritation and health symptoms from chemical exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 69:407-417.
8. Distel H, Ayabe-Kanamura S, Martinez-Gomez M, Schicker I, Kobayakawa T, Saito S, Hudson R. 1999. Perception of everyday odors-correlation between intensity, familiarity and strength of hedonic judgement. Chem Senses. 24:191-199.
9. Ekman G, Berglund B, Berglund V, Lindval T. 1967. Perceived intensity of odor as a function of time of adaptation. Scand J Psychol. 8:177-186.
10. Hummel T, Kobal G. 1999. Chemosensory event-related potentials to trigeminal stimuli change in relation to the interval between repetitive stimulation of the nasal mucosa. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 256:16-21.
11. Kobal G. 1985. Pain-related electrical potentials of the human nasal mucosa elicited by chemical stimulation. Pain. 22:151-163.
12. Kobal G, Hummel T. 1988. Olfaction: Chemosensory evoked potentials in patients with olfactory disturbances. Rhinology. 26 (suppl): 1-18.
13. Saito S, Ayabe-Kanamura S, Takashima Y, Gotow N, Nito N, Nozawa T, Mise M, Deguchi Y, Kobayakawa T. 2006. Development of a smell identification test using a novel stick-type odor presentation kit. Chem Senses. 31:379-391.
14. Saito, S, Iio K, Kobayakawa T, Gotow N. 2004. Variation in intensity curves during odor exposure, J Jpn Assoc Odor Environ. 35:17-21. [in Japanese].
15. Saito S, Kobayakawa T, Gotow N, Iio K. 2004. Variety of time intensity curves during offensive odor exposure and its relation with perceptual and cognitive aspects. ECRO Congr. p. 107. [abstract].
16. Sekine M, Saito S, Iio S. 1995. Response properties of metal-oxide-semi-conductor gas sensor to odor presented continuously. J Odor Res Eng. 26:122-127. [in Japanese].
17. Smeets M, Dalton P. 2002. Perceived odor and irritation of isopropanol: a comparison between naive controls and occupationally exposed workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 75:541-548.
18. Smeets M, Dalton P. 2005. Evaluating the human response to chemicals: odor, irritation and non-sensory factors. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 19:581-588.
19. Smeets M, Maute C, Dalton P. 2002. Acute sensory irritation from exposure to isopropanol (2-propanol) at TLV in workers and controls: objective versus subjective effects. Ann Occup Hyg. 46:359-373.