Building a local agenda for dissemination of research into practice

Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 185-192

  Arrington, Barbara ^a,b   Kimmey, James ^c   Brewster, Mikki ^c   Bentley, Judy ^d   Kane, Mary ^e   Van Brunschot, Catherine ^e   Burns, Melissa ^e   Quinlan, Kathleen ^e   Brownson, Ross C ^a  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

^c Missouri Foundation for Health   (United States)

^d Missouri Foundation for Health ^*  (United States)

^e Department of Research   (United States)

Author keywords

Action planning; Concept mapping; Translation and dissemination

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; EDUCATION; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; KNOWLEDGE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRAINING; UNITED STATES;

COMMUNITY-INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EDUCATION, CONTINUING; EDUCATION, PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSIONAL; HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE; SCHOOLS, MEDICAL; URBAN HEALTH;

EID: 39749113285     PISSN: 10784659     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000311898.03573.28     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Crosswaite C, Curtice L. Disseminating research results - the challenge of bridging the gap between health research and health action. Health Promot Int. 1994;9(4):289-296.
2. Johnson JL, Green LW, Frankish CJ, et al. A dissemination research agenda to strengthen health promotion and disease prevention. Can J Public Health. 1996;87(suppl 2):S5-S10.
3. Lenfant C. Clinical research to clinical practice - lost in translation? N Engl J Med. 2003;349(9):868-874.
4. Kerner J, Rimer B, Emmons K. Introduction to the special section on dissemination: dissemination research and research dissemination: how can we close the gap? Health Psychol. 2005;24(5):443-446.
5. Glasgow RE, Emmons KM. How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:413-433.
6. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2635-2645.
7. National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research. Guides to improving practice. http://www.naric.com/research/record.cfm?search=2&type= all&criteria=Guides%20to%20improving%20practice.&phrase=no&rec= 16619.
8. McDaid D, Cookson R. Evaluating health care interventions in the European Union. Health Policy. 2003;63(2):133-139.
9. Brownson RC, Kreuter MW, Arrington BA, True WR. Translating scientific discoveries into public health action: how can schools of public health move us forward? Public Health Rep. 2006;121(1):97-103.
10. Trochim W. Concept mapping: soft science or hard art? Eval Program Plann. 1989;12:87-110.
11. Trochim W. Reliability of concept mapping. Paper presented at: Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association; November 6-11, 1993; Dallas, Texas.
12. Bartholomew DJ, Steele F, Moustaki I, Galbraith JI. The Analysis and Interpretation of Multivariate Data for Social Scientists. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2002.
13. Robinson K, Elliott SJ, Driedger SM, et al. Using linking systems to build capacity and enhance dissemination in heart health promotion: a Canadian multiple-case study. Health Educ Res. 2005;20(5):499-513.
14. Trochim W, Stillman F, Clark P, Schmitt C. Development of a model of the tobacco industry's interference with tobacco control programs. Tob Control [serial online]. 2003;12:140-147. http://www.socialresearchmethods. net/research/Tobacco%20Tactics%20Paper.pdf. Accessed February 28, 2007.
15. Trochim W. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Eval Program Plann. 1989;12(special issue):1-16.
16. Trochim W, Milstein B, Wood BJ, Jackson S, Pressler V. Setting objectives for community and systems change: an application of concept mapping for planning a statewide health improvement initiative. Health Prom Prac. 2004;5:8-19.
17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1999;48(RR-11):1-40.
18. Kerner JF, Best A, Quinlan KM, et al. Integrating research with practice: the Canadian-US cancer control alliance action framework. Paper presented at: UICC World Cancer Congress; July 8-12, 2006;Washington, DC.
19. Kane M, Trochim WMK. Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2007.
20. Green LW. Public health asks of systems science: to advance our evidence-based practice, can you help us get more practice-based evidence? Am J Public Health. 2006;96(3):406-409.
21. Denis JL, Lehoux P, Hivon M, Champagne F. Creating a new articulation between research and practice through policy? The views and experiences of researchers and practitioners. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003;8(suppl 2):44-50.
22. Lancaster B. Closing the gap between research and practice. Health Educ Q. 1992;19:408-411.
23. Roussos ST, Fawcett SB. A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:369-402.
24. Schwartz R, Capwell E. Advancing the link between health promotion researchers and practitioners: a commentary. Health Educ Res. 1995;10:i-v.
25. Wheeler FC, Anderson LA, Boddie-Willis C, Patricia HP, Kane M. The role of state public health agencies in addressing less prevalent chronic conditions. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online]. 2005;2(3). http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/ issues/2005/jul/04 0129.htm. Accessed March 15, 2006.
26. Anderson LA, Gwaltney MK, Sundra DL, et al. Using concept mapping to develop a logic model for the Prevention Research Centers Program. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online]. 2006;3(1). http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2006/ jan/05 0153.htm. Accessed March 15, 2006.
27. Kruskal JB, Wish M. Multidimensional Scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1978.