Internet testing: Equivalence between proctored lab and unproctored field conditions

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 1216-1228

  Templer, Klaus J ^a   Lange, Stefan R ^b  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Employee selection; Equivalence; Internet testing; Online assessment; Psychometrics; Screening

Indexed keywords

ONLINE SYSTEMS; PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING; QUALITY OF SERVICE;

EMPLOYEE SELECTION; INTERNET TESTING; ONLINE ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRICS;

INTERNET;

EID: 39749097955     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bartram D., and Brown A. Online testing: Mode of administration and the stability of OPQ 32i scores. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 12 3 (2004) 278-284
2. Beaty, J. C., Fallon, J. D., & Shepherd, W. (2002). Proctored versus unproctored web-based administration of a cognitive ability test. Presented at the 17th annual SIOP conference, Toronto.
3. Boudreau J.W., and Rynes S.L. Role of recruitment in staffing utility analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 70 (1985) 354-366
4. Bressani R.V., and Downs A.C. Youth independent living assessment: Testing the equivalence of web and paper/pencil versions of the Ansell-Casey Life Skills Assessment. Computers in Human Behavior 18 (2002) 453-464
5. Buchanan T., and Smith J.L. Using the Internet for psychological research: Personality testing on the World-Wide Web. British Journal of Psychology 90 (1999) 125-144
6. Carlbring P., Brunt S., Bohman S., Austin D., Richards J., Öst L.-G., et al. Internet vs. paper and pencil administration of questionnaires commonly used in panic/agoraphobia research. Computers in Human Behavior 23 (2007) 1421-1434
7. Chapman S.D., and Webster J. The use of technologies in the recruiting, screening, and selection process for job candidates. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 11 2/3 (2003) 113-120
8. Chuah S.C., Drasgow F., and Roberts B.W. Personality assessment: Does the medium matter? No. Journal of Research in Personality 40 (2006) 359-376
9. Coyne I., Warszta T., Beadle S., and Sheehan N. The impact of mode of administration on the equivalence of a test battery: A quasi-experimental design. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 13 3 (2005) 220-224
10. Do, B.-R., Shepherd, W. J., & Drasgow, F. (2005). Measurement equivalence across proctored and unproctored administration modes of web-based measures. Presented at the 20th annual SIOP conference, Los Angeles.
11. Epstein J., Klinkenberg W.D., Wiley D., and McKinley L. Insuring sample equivalence across Internet and paper-and-pencil assessments. Computers in Human Behavior 17 (2001) 339-346
12. Herrero J., and Meneses J. Short web-based versions of the perceived stress (PSS) and Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CESD) scales: A comparison to pencil and paper responses among Internet users. Computers in Human Behavior 22 (2006) 830-846
13. Hiltmann M., Kirbach C., Mette C., and Montel C. PERLS-Testhandbuch (PERLS user manual) (2005), Eligo, Bochum
14. Huang H.-M. Do print and web surveys provide the same results?. Computers in Human Behavior 22 (2006) 334-350
15. Kirbach C., and Montel C. PERLS - Ein neues System für das Internetrecruiting und -Assessment. Wirtschaftspsychologie 1 (2002) 39-42
16. Kirbach C., Montel C., Oenning S., and Wottawa H. Recruiting und Assessment im Internet (2004), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen
17. Knapp H., and Kirk S.A. Using pencil and paper, Internet and touch-tone phones for self-administered surveys: Does methodology matter?. Computers in Human Behavior 19 (2003) 117-134
18. Lievens F., and Harris M.M. Research on Internet recruitment and testing: Current status and future directions. In: Cooper C.L., and Robertson I.T. (Eds). International review of industrial and organizational psychology Vol. 18 (2003), Wiley, Chichester 131-165
19. Luce K.H., Winzelberg A.J., Das S., Osborne M.I., Bryson S.W., and Taylor C.B. Reliability of self-report: Paper versus online administration. Computers in Human Behavior 23 (2007) 1384-1389
20. McFarland L.A., Ryan A.M., and Ellis A. Item placement on a personality measure: Effects on faking behavior and test measurement properties. Journal of Personality Assessment 78 (2002) 348-369
21. Mead A.D., and Drasgow F. Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 114 3 (1993) 449-458
22. Miller E.T., Neal D.J., Roberts L.J., Baer J.S., Cressler S.O., Metrik J., et al. Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: Is there a difference between Internet-based assessment and traditional method?. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 16 1 (2002) 56-63
23. Naglieri J.A., Drasgow F., Schmit M., Handler L., Prifitera A., Margolis A., et al. Psychological testing on the Internet. New problems, old issues. American Psychologist 59 3 (2004) 150-162
24. Oswald, F. L., Carr, J. Z., & Schmidt, A. M. (2001). The medium and the message. Presented at the 16th annual SIOP conference, San Diego.
25. Ployhart R.E., Weekley J.A., Holtz B.C., and Kemp C. Web-based and paper-and-pencil testing of applicants in a proctored setting: Are personality, biodata, and situational judgment tests comparable?. Personnel Psychology 56 3 (2003) 733-752
26. Richman W.L., Kiesler S., Weisband S., and Drasgow F. A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology 84 5 (1999) 754-775
27. Salgado J.F., and Moscoso S. Internet-based personality testing: Equivalence of measures and assesses' perceptions and reactions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 11 2/3 (2003) 194-205
28. Schmidt F.L., and Hunter J.E. Theory testing and measurement error. Intelligence 27 3 (1999) 183-198
29. Tippins N.T., Beaty J., Drasgow F., Gibson W.M., Pearlman K., Segal D.O., et al. Unproctored Internet testing in employment settings. Personnel Psychology 59 (2006) 189-225
30. Whitaker B.G. Internet-based attitude assessment: Does gender affect measurement equivalence?. Computers in Human Behavior 23 (2007) 1183-1194