Internet-based personality testing: Equivalence of measures and assesses' perceptions and reactions

International Journal of Selection and Assessment

Volumn 11, Issue 2-3, 2003, Pages 194-205

  Salgado, Jesús F ^a   Moscoso, Silvia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042672970     PISSN: 0965075X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2389.00243     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Andersen, N. (2003) Applicant and Recruiter Reactions to New Technology in Selection: A Critical Review and Agenda for Future Research. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 000-000.
2. Barrick, M., Mount, M.K. and Judge, T. (2001) Personality and performance at the beginning of the new Millennium: What we do know and where do we go next. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 8-30.
3. Bartram, D. (2000) Internet recruitment and selection: Kissing frogs to find princes. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 261-274.
4. Buchanan, T. and Smith, J.L. (1999) Using Internet for psychological research: Personality testing on the World Wide Web. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 125-144.
5. Cattell, R.B. (1966) The meaning and strategic use of factor analysis. In R.B. Cattell (ed). Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology (pp 174-243). Chicago: Rand McNally.
6. Cattell, R.B., Eber, H.W. and Tatsouoka, M. (1970) Handbook for the 16PF. Champaign, IL: IPAT.
7. Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
8. Costa, P.T. and McCrae, R.R. (1992) Manual for the NEO-PI-R. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
9. Cronbach, L.J. (1990) Essentials of Psychological Testing 5th edn. New York: HarperCollins.
10. Cronk, B.C. and West, J.L. (2002) Personality research on the Internet: A comparison of Web-based and traditional instruments in take-home and in-class settings. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 177-180.
11. Davis, R.N. (1999) Web-based administration of a personality questionnaire: Comparison with traditional methods. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 572-577.
12. Eysenck, H.J. and Eysenck, S.B.G. (1964) Manual of the Eysenck personality inventory. London: University of London Press.
13. Gangestad, S.W. and Snyder, M. (1985) 'To carve nature at its joints': On the existence classes in personality. Psychological Review, 92, 317-340.
14. George, C.E., Lankford, J.S. and Wilson, S.E. (1998) The effects of computerized versus paper-and-pencil administration of measures of negative affect. Computers in Human Behavior, 8, 203-209.
15. Guion, R.M. and Gottier, R.F. (1965) Validity of personality measures in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 18, 135-164.
16. Harman, H.H. (1976) Modern Factor Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Hedges, L.V. and Olkin, I. (1985) Statistical Methods for Metaanalysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
18. Hewith, P. and Flett, G. (1995) Perfectionistic Self-Presentation Scale (Unpublished test. York University, Toronto, Canada.
19. Hogan, R. and Hogan, J. (1995) Hogan Personality Inventory Manual. Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.
20. Kline, P. (1993) Handbook of Psychological Testing. London: Routledge.
21. Lautenschlager, G. and Flaherty, V. (1990) Computer administration of questions: More desirable or more social desirability? Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 310-314.
22. Loyd, B.H and Gressard, C. (1984) Reliability and factorial validity of computer attitude scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 501-505.
23. Marlowe, D. and Crowne, D.P. (1960) A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354.
24. McBride, J.R. (1998) Innovations in computer-based ability testing: Promise, problems, and perils. In M.D. Hakel (ed.) Beyond multiple choice: Evaluating Alternatives to Traditional Testing for Selection (pp. 23-39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Mead, A.D. (2001) How well does web-based testing work? Results of a survey of users of Net Assess (Paper presented at the 16th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SOP), San Diego, CA.
26. Mead, A.D. and Drasgow, F. (1993) Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 449-458.
27. Ones, D.S. and Viswesvaran, C. (2001) Intregrity tests and other criterion-focused occupational personality scales (COPS) used in personnel selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 31-39.
28. Oswald, F.L., Carr, J.Z. and Schmidt, A.M. (2001) The Medium and the Message: Dual Effects of Supervision and Web-Eased Testing on Measurement Equivalence for Ability and Personality Measures (Presented at the 16th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP), San Diego, CA.
29. Pasveer, K.A. and Ellard, J.H. (1998) The making of a personality inventory: Help from the WWW. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 309-313.
30. Pettit, F.A. (1998) Pettit WWW Random Responding Scale. Unpublished test. York University, North York, Ontario, Canada.
31. Pettit, F.A. (2002) A comparison of World-Wide Web and paper-and-pencil personality questionnaires. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 50-54.
32. Ployhart, R.E., Weekley, J., Holtz, B. and Kemp, C. (2002) Web-Based vs. Paper-and-Pencil Testing: Are Personality, Biodata, and Situational Judgment Tests Comparable In Applicant Settings? (Paper presented at the 17th Annual Conference of Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP), Toronto, Canada.
33. Reynolds, D.H., Sinar, E.F. and McClough, A.C. (2000) Evaluation of an Internet-based selection procedure (Paper presented at the 15th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SOP), New Orleans, LA.
34. Rolland, J.P. and Mogenet, J.L. (2001) Manuel d'application. Description en Cinq Dimensions (D5D) ([Technical manual. Description in Five Dimensions (D5D)]. Paris: Les Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
35. Salgado, J.F. (1996) Análisis Exploratorio y Confirmatorio del IP/5F. [Exploratory and Confirmatory Analyses of the IP/5F]. Psicológica, 17, 353-366.
36. Salgado, J.F. (1997) The Five-Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community (EC). Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 30-43.
37. Salgado, J.F. (1998) Manual técnico del IP/5F ([Technical manual for the IP/5F] Santiago de Compostela, Spain: Tórculo.
38. Salgado, J.F. (2002) The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 117-125.
39. Salgado, J.F. (2003) Predicting job performance using FFM and non-FFM personality measures. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76.
40. Salgado, J.F., Remeseiro, C. and Iglesias, M. (1996) Personality and test-taking motivation. Psicothema, 8, 553-562.
41. Schmidt, F.L. and Hunter, J.E. (1999) Theory testing and measurement error. Intelligence, 27, 183-198.
42. Schmitt, N., Gooding, R.Z., Noe, R.A. and Kirsch, M. (1984) Meta-analyses of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 37, 407-422.
43. Steiner, D.D. and Gilliland, S.W. (2001) Procedural justice in personnel selection: International and cross-cultural perspectives. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 124-137.
44. Vispoel, W.P., Boo, J. and Bleiler, T. (2001) Computerized and paper and pencil versions of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale: A comparison of psychometric features and respondent preferences. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 461-474.