Measurement and modelling of glyphosate fate compared with that of herbicides replaced as a result of the introduction of glyphosate-resistant oilseed rape

Pest Management Science

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 262-275

  Mamy, Laure ^a,b   Gabrielle, Benoit ^a   Barriuso, Enrique ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

Author keywords

AMPA; Field dissipation; Field mobility; Metazachlor; PRZM; Trifluralin

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL CONTROL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DICOTYLEDON; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL FATE; GLYPHOSATE; MEASUREMENT METHOD; MOBILITY; PERSISTENCE; PESTICIDE RESISTANCE; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL PROFILE; VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION; WEED CONTROL;

BRASSICA NAPUS;

EID: 39749094938     PISSN: 1526498X     EISSN: 15264998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ps.1519     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. 1 Les Pesticides dans les Eaux. Données 2003 et 2004. Les dossiers IFEN, No. 05, August 2006, Institut Français de l'Environnement, Orléans, 40 pp. (2006).
2. 2 Shaner DL, The impact of glyphosate‐tolerant crops on the use of other herbicides and on resistance management. Pest Manag Sci 56: 320–326 (2000).
3. 3 Gianessi LP, Economic and herbicide use impacts of glyphosate‐resistant crops. Pest Manag Sci 61: 241–245 (2005).
4. 4 Madsen KH and Sandøe P, Ethical reflections on herbicide‐resistant crops. Pest Manag Sci 61: 318–325 (2005).
5. 5 Owen MDK and Zelaya IA, Herbicide‐resistant crops and weed resistance to herbicides. Pest Manag Sci 61: 301–311 (2005).
6. 6 Wauchope RD, Estes TL, Allen R, Baker JL, Hornsby AG, Jones RL, et al, Predicted impact of transgenic, herbicide‐tolerant corn on drinking water quality in vulnerable watersheds of the mid‐western USA. Pest Manag Sci 58: 146–160 (2001).
7. 7 Laitinen P, Siimes K, Eronen L, Rämö S, Welling L, Oinonen S, et al, Fate of the herbicides glyphosate, glufosinate‐ammonium, phenmedipham, ethofumesate and metamitron in two Finnish arable soils. Pest Manag Sci 62: 473–491 (2006).
8. 8 Duke SO, Taking stock of herbicide‐resistant crops ten years after introduction. Pest Manag Sci 61: 211–218 (2005).
9. 9 Mamy L and Barriuso E, Glyphosate adsorption in soils compared to herbicides replaced with the introduction of glyphosate resistant crops. Chemosphere 61: 844–855 (2005).
10. 10 Mamy L, Barriuso E and Gabrielle B, Environmental fate of herbicides trifluralin, metazachlor, metamitron and sulcotrione compared with that of glyphosate, a substitute broad spectrum herbicide for different glyphosate‐resistant crops. Pest Manag Sci 61: 905–916 (2005).
11. 11 Mamy L and Barriuso E, Desorption and time‐dependent sorption of herbicides in soils. Europ J Soil Sci 58: 174–187 (2007).
12. 12 Grunewald K, Schmidt W, Unger C and Hanschmann G, Behaviour of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) in soils and water of reservoir Radeburg II catchment (Saxony/Germany). J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 164: 65–70 (2001).
13. 13 Agritox. [Online]. Available: http://www.dive.afssa.fr/agritox/ [10 September 2007].
14. 14 Roy ND, Konar SK, Banerjee S, Charles DA, Thompson DG and Prasad R, Persistence, movement and degradation of glyphosate in selected Canadian boreal forest soils. J Agric Food Chem 37: 437–440 (1989).
15. 15 Newton M, Horner LM, Cowell JE, White DE and Cole E, Dissipation of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in North American forests. J Agric Food Chem 42: 1795–1802 (1994).
16. 16 Giesy JP, Dobson S and Solomon KR, Ecotoxicological assessment for Roundup ® herbicide. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 167: 35–120 (2000).
17. 17 Kjaer J, Olsen P, Ullum M and Grant R, Leaching of glyphosate and amino‐methylphosphonic acid from Danish agricultural field sites. J Environ Qual 34: 608–620 (2005).
18. 18 Veiga F, Zapata JM, Fernandez Marcos ML and Alvarez E, Dynamics of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in a forest soil in Galicia, north‐west Spain. Sci Tot Environ 271: 135–144 (2001).
19. 19 Jolley AV and Johnstone PK, Degradation of trifluralin in three Victorian soils under field and laboratory conditions. Aust J Exp Agric 34: 57–65 (1994).
20. 20 Berger BM, Dühlmeier D and Siebert CF, Tillage effects on persistence and distribution of trifluralin in soil. J Environ Qual 28: 1162–1167 (1999).
21. 21 Laabs V, Amelung W, Pinto A and Zech W, Fate of pesticides in tropical soils of Brazil under field conditions. J Environ Qual 31: 256–268 (2002).
22. 22 Bedos C, Rousseau‐Djabri MF, Gabrielle B, Flura D, Durand B, Barriuso E, et al, Measurement of trifluralin volatilization in the field: relation to soil residue and effect of soil incorporation. Environ Pollut 144: 958–966 (2006).
23. 23 Ying GG and Williams BD, Mobility and persistence of four herbicides in soil of a South Australian vineyard. Pest Manag Sci 56: 277–283 (2000).
24. 24 Walker A and Brown PA, The relative persistence in soil of five acetanilide herbicides. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 34: 143–149 (1985).
25. 25 Rouchaud J, Metsue M, Van Himme M, Bulcke R, Gillet J and Vanparys L, Soil metabolism of the herbicide metazachlor in barley and vegetable crop. Med Fac Landbouww Rijksuniv Gent 54/2a: 257–261 (1989).
26. 26 Rouchaud J, Metsue M, Van Himme M, Bulcke R, Gillet J and Vanparys L, Soil degradation of metazachlor in agronomic and vegetable crop fields. Weed Sci 40: 149–154 (1992).
27. 27 Baer U and Calvet R, Fate of soil applied herbicides: experimental data and prediction of dissipation kinetics. J Environ Qual 28: 1765–1777 (1999).
28. 28 Carsel RF, Imhoff JC, Hummel PR, Cheplick JM and Donigian AS, Jr, PRZM‐3: a Model for Predicting Pesticide and Nitrogen Fate in the Crop Root and Unsaturated Soil Zones: User's Manual for Release 3.12. National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA (1998).
29. 29 Pennell KD, Hornsby AG, Jesup RE and Rao PSC, Evaluation of five simulation models for predicting aldicarb and bromide behavior under field conditions. Water Resour Res 26: 2679–2693 (1990).
30. 30 Sauer TJ, Fermanich KJ and Daniel TC, Comparison of the Pesticide Root Zone Model simulated and measured pesticide mobility under two tillage systems. J Environ Qual 19: 727–734 (1990).
31. 31 Baer U and Calvet R, Simulation and prediction of dissipation kinetics of two herbicides in different pedo‐climatic situations. Int J Environ Anal Chem 68: 213–237 (1997).
32. 32 Garratt JA, Capri E, Trevisan M, Errera G and Wilkins RM, Parameterization, evaluation and comparison of pesticide leaching models to data from Bologna field site, Italy. Pest Manag Sci 58: 3–20 (2002).
33. 33 Jackson SH, Use of PRZM‐3 to validate a laboratory to field degradation conceptual model. Pest Manag Sci 60: 8–16 (2003).
34. 34 Parrish RS, Smith CN and Fong FK, Tests of the Pesticide Root Zone Model and the Aggregate Model for transport and transformation of aldicarb, metolachlor and bromide. J Environ Qual 21: 685–697 (1992).
35. 35 Ma QL, Holland PT, James TK and McNaughton DE, Persistence and leaching of the herbicides acetochlor and terbutylazine in an allophonic soil: comparisons of field results with PRZM‐3 predictions. Pest Manag Sci 56: 159–167 (2000).
36. 36 Walker A, Welch SJ, Melacini A and Moon YH, Evaluation of three pesticides leaching models with experimental data for alachlor, atrazine and metribuzin. Weed Res 36: 37–47 (1996).
37. 37 Royer A, Beguin S, Tabet JC, Hulot S, Reding MA and Communal PY, Determination of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid residues in water by gas chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry after exchange ion resin purification and derivatization. Application on vegetable matrixes. Anal Chem 72: 3826–3832 (2000).
38. 38 Mamy L, Comparaison des impacts environnementaux des herbicides à large spectre et des herbicides sélectifs: caractérisation de leur devenir dans le sol et modélisation. PhD Thesis, 333 pp. [Online]. Institut National Agronomique Paris‐Grignon (2004). Available: http://www.inra.fr/ea/ fichier_these/MAMY‐L.pdf [10 September 2007].
39. 39 FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios in the EU Review of Active Substances. Report of the FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios Workgroup, EC document reference Sanco/321/2000 rev.2, 202 pp. (2000).
40. 40 Jamagne M, Bétrémieux R, Bégon JC and Mori A, Quelques données sur la variabilité dans le milieu naturel de la réserve en eau des sols. Bull Tech Inf 324–325: 627–641 (1977).
41. 41 Arrouays D, Jamagne M and Gaillard H, Sur la possibilité d'estimer les propriétés de rétention en eau de sols limoneux lessivés hydromorphes du sud‐ouest de la France à partir de leurs caractéristiques de constitution. CR Acad Agric Fr 79: 111–121 (1993).
42. 42 Tessier D, Bigorre F and Bruand A, La capacité d'échange: outil de prévision des propriétés physiques des sols. CR Acad Agric Fr 85: 37–46 (1999).
43. 43 White RE, Principles and Practice of Soil Science. The Soil as a Natural Resource, 3rd edition. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, 348 pp. (1997).
44. 44 Raturi S, Carroll MJ and Hill RL, Turfgrass thatch effects on pesticide leaching: a laboratory and modeling study. J Environ Qual 32: 215–223 (2003).
45. 45 Villeneuve JP, Lafrance P, Banton O, Frechette P and Robert C, A sensitivity analysis of adsorption and degradation parameters in the modeling of pesticide transport in soils. J Contam Hydrol 3: 77–96 (1988).
46. 46 Fontaine DD, Havens PL, Blau GE and Tillotson PM, The role of sensitivity analysis in groundwater risk modeling for pesticide. Weed Technol 6: 716–724 (1992).
47. 47 Dubus IG, Brown CD and Beulke S, Sensitivity analyses for four pesticide leaching models. Pest Manag Sci 59: 962–982 (2003).
48. 48 Smith J, Smith P and Addiscott T, Quantitative methods to evaluate and compare soil organic matter (SOM) models. NATO ASI Series I38: 181–199 (1996).
49. 49 Flury M, Experimental evidence of transport of pesticides through field soils—a review. J Environ Qual 25: 25–45 (1996).
50. 50 Vischetti C, Businelli M, Marini M, Capri E, Trevisan M, Del Re AAM, et al, Characterization of spatial variability structure in three separate field trials on pesticide dissipation. Pestic Sci 50: 175–182 (1997).
51. 51 Beulke S, Dubus IG, Brown CD and Gottesbüren B, Simulation of pesticide persistence in the field on the basis of laboratory data—a review. J Environ Qual 29: 1371–1379 (2000).